178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20661952)
1. Meta-analysis methodology for combining treatment effects from Cox proportional hazard models with different covariate adjustments.
Yuan X; Anderson SJ
Biom J; 2010 Aug; 52(4):519-37. PubMed ID: 20661952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Investigating trial and treatment heterogeneity in an individual patient data meta-analysis of survival data by means of the penalized maximum likelihood approach.
Rondeau V; Michiels S; Liquet B; Pignon JP
Stat Med; 2008 May; 27(11):1894-910. PubMed ID: 18069745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Flexible parametric proportional-hazards and proportional-odds models for censored survival data, with application to prognostic modelling and estimation of treatment effects.
Royston P; Parmar MK
Stat Med; 2002 Aug; 21(15):2175-97. PubMed ID: 12210632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A non-parametric procedure for evaluating treatment effect in the meta-analysis of survival data.
Moodie PF; Nelson NA; Koch GG
Stat Med; 2004 Apr; 23(7):1075-93. PubMed ID: 15057879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Investigating heterogeneity in an individual patient data meta-analysis of time to event outcomes.
Smith CT; Williamson PR; Marson AG
Stat Med; 2005 May; 24(9):1307-19. PubMed ID: 15685717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Meta-analysis of the Italian studies on short-term effects of air pollution].
Biggeri A; Bellini P; Terracini B;
Epidemiol Prev; 2001; 25(2 Suppl):1-71. PubMed ID: 11515188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Treatment-effect estimates adjusted for small-study effects via a limit meta-analysis.
Rücker G; Schwarzer G; Carpenter JR; Binder H; Schumacher M
Biostatistics; 2011 Jan; 12(1):122-42. PubMed ID: 20656692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Improved tests for a random effects meta-regression with a single covariate.
Knapp G; Hartung J
Stat Med; 2003 Sep; 22(17):2693-710. PubMed ID: 12939780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of underlying risk as a source of heterogeneity in meta-analyses: a simulation study of Bayesian and frequentist implementations of three models.
Dohoo I; Stryhn H; Sanchez J
Prev Vet Med; 2007 Sep; 81(1-3):38-55. PubMed ID: 17477995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Random effects survival models gave a better understanding of heterogeneity in individual patient data meta-analyses.
Michiels S; Baujat B; Mahé C; Sargent DJ; Pignon JP
J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Mar; 58(3):238-45. PubMed ID: 15718112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The type I error and power of non-parametric logrank and Wilcoxon tests with adjustment for covariates--a simulation study.
Jiang H; Symanowski J; Paul S; Qu Y; Zagar A; Hong S
Stat Med; 2008 Dec; 27(28):5850-60. PubMed ID: 18759373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Practical methodology of meta-analysis of individual patient data using a survival outcome.
Katsahian S; Latouche A; Mary JY; Chevret S; Porcher R
Contemp Clin Trials; 2008 Mar; 29(2):220-30. PubMed ID: 17884735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Bias analysis and the simulation-extrapolation method for survival data with covariate measurement error under parametric proportional odds models.
Yi GY; He W
Biom J; 2012 May; 54(3):343-60. PubMed ID: 22685001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bias due to aggregation of individual covariates in the Cox regression model.
Abrahamowicz M; Du Berger R; Krewski D; Burnett R; Bartlett G; Tamblyn RM; Leffondré K
Am J Epidemiol; 2004 Oct; 160(7):696-706. PubMed ID: 15383414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Nonparametric correction for covariate measurement error in a stratified Cox model.
Gorfine M; Hsu L; Prentice RL
Biostatistics; 2004 Jan; 5(1):75-87. PubMed ID: 14744829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A new strategy for meta-analysis of continuous covariates in observational studies.
Sauerbrei W; Royston P
Stat Med; 2011 Dec; 30(28):3341-60. PubMed ID: 21953493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. What to add to nothing? Use and avoidance of continuity corrections in meta-analysis of sparse data.
Sweeting MJ; Sutton AJ; Lambert PC
Stat Med; 2004 May; 23(9):1351-75. PubMed ID: 15116347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reduced-rank hazard regression for modelling non-proportional hazards.
Perperoglou A; le Cessie S; van Houwelingen HC
Stat Med; 2006 Aug; 25(16):2831-45. PubMed ID: 16158396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Some diagnostic methods for Cox regression models through hazard smoothing.
Gray RJ
Biometrics; 1990 Mar; 46(1):93-102. PubMed ID: 2190638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Attenuation caused by infrequently updated covariates in survival analysis.
Andersen PK; Liestøl K
Biostatistics; 2003 Oct; 4(4):633-49. PubMed ID: 14557116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
