216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20662444)
1. [Cervical disc arthroplasty (Prodisc-C): analysis of 3 to 4- year follow up results].
Hrabálek L; Vaverka M; Houdek M
Rozhl Chir; 2009 Nov; 88(11):634-41. PubMed ID: 20662444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [ProDisc-C Total Disc Replacement. A four-year prospective monocentric study].
Barna M; Stulík J; Kryl J; Vyskočil T; Nesnídal P
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2012; 79(6):512-9. PubMed ID: 23286683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [ProDisc-C mobile replacement of an intervertebral disc. A prospective mono-centric two-year study].
Stulík J; Kryl J; Sebesta P; Vyskocil T; Krbec M; Trc T
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2008 Aug; 75(4):253-61. PubMed ID: 18760080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Effectiveness evaluation of Prodisc-C prosthesis for more than 10 years follow-up after total cervical disc replacement].
Xu S; Liang Y; Zhu Z; Wang K; Liu H
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Apr; 33(4):393-402. PubMed ID: 30983184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Stabilization with the Dynamic Cervical Implant: a novel treatment approach following cervical discectomy and decompression.
Matgé G; Berthold C; Gunness VR; Hana A; Hertel F
J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Mar; 22(3):237-45. PubMed ID: 25555050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Comparison of short-term effectiveness of Prodisc-C Vivo artificial disc replacement and Zero-P fusion for treatment of single-segment cervical spondylosis].
Ma Y; Wang W; Guan Z; Huang Y; Yu L
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2022 Sep; 36(9):1132-1143. PubMed ID: 36111477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical and radiological outcome at 10 years of follow-up after total cervical disc replacement.
Mehren C; Heider F; Siepe CJ; Zillner B; Kothe R; Korge A; Mayer HM
Eur Spine J; 2017 Sep; 26(9):2441-2449. PubMed ID: 28676980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Four-year results of a prospective single-arm study on 200 semi-constrained total cervical disc prostheses: clinical and radiographic outcome.
Meisel HJ; Jurák L; Antinheimo J; Arregui R; Bruchmann B; Čabraja M; Caroli F; Kroppenstedt S; Kryl J; Pohjola J; Shackleford I; Sola S; Stosberg P; Stulik J; Woiciechowsky C; Suchomel P
J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Nov; 25(5):556-565. PubMed ID: 27258476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Clinical outcome of mid-term follow-up of anterior cervical non-fusion surgery versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for cervical spondylosis].
Guan L; Wang WL; Hai Y; Liu YZ; Chen XL; Chen L
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2016 Jul; 96(25):1991-6. PubMed ID: 27470956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Heterotopic ossification in total cervical artificial disc replacement.
Mehren C; Suchomel P; Grochulla F; Barsa P; Sourkova P; Hradil J; Korge A; Mayer HM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Nov; 31(24):2802-6. PubMed ID: 17108833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical and radiographic outcomes of cervical disc replacement with a new prosthesis.
Miao J; Yu F; Shen Y; He N; Kuang Y; Wang X; Chen D
Spine J; 2014 Jun; 14(6):878-83. PubMed ID: 24095101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Postoperative nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs and the prevention of heterotopic ossification after cervical arthroplasty: analysis using CT and a minimum 2-year follow-up.
Tu TH; Wu JC; Huang WC; Chang HK; Ko CC; Fay LY; Wu CL; Cheng H
J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 May; 22(5):447-53. PubMed ID: 25723121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Analysis of effectiveness and incidence of heterotopic ossification after single-level Bryan cervical artificial disc replacement].
Liu W; Zhu B; Liu X; Sun Y
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Jun; 26(6):699-702. PubMed ID: 22792767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical and radiological analysis of Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty: eight-year follow-up results compared with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.
Lei T; Liu Y; Wang H; Xu J; Ma Q; Wang L; Shen Y
Int Orthop; 2016 Jun; 40(6):1197-203. PubMed ID: 26744166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical and radiographic analysis of an artificial cervical disc: 7-year follow-up from the Prestige prospective randomized controlled clinical trial: Clinical article.
Burkus JK; Traynelis VC; Haid RW; Mummaneni PV
J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Oct; 21(4):516-28. PubMed ID: 25036218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Radiological changes of the operated and adjacent segments following cervical arthroplasty after a minimum 24-month follow-up: comparison between the Bryan and Prodisc-C devices.
Ryu KS; Park CK; Jun SC; Huh HY
J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Sep; 13(3):299-307. PubMed ID: 20809721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Differences between soft-disc herniation and spondylosis in cervical arthroplasty: CT-documented heterotopic ossification with minimum 2 years of follow-up.
Wu JC; Huang WC; Tu TH; Tsai HW; Ko CC; Wu CL; Cheng H
J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Feb; 16(2):163-71. PubMed ID: 22136390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Results of the prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-C total disc replacement versus anterior discectomy and fusion for the treatment of 1-level symptomatic cervical disc disease.
Murrey D; Janssen M; Delamarter R; Goldstein J; Zigler J; Tay B; Darden B
Spine J; 2009 Apr; 9(4):275-86. PubMed ID: 18774751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical outcomes of Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty a prospective, randomized, controlled, single site trial with 48-month follow-up.
Garrido BJ; Taha TA; Sasso RC
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2010 Aug; 23(6):367-71. PubMed ID: 20087223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Outcomes of the Bryan cervical disc replacement: fifteen year follow-up.
Pointillart V; Castelain JE; Coudert P; Cawley DT; Gille O; Vital JM
Int Orthop; 2018 Apr; 42(4):851-857. PubMed ID: 29288377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
