BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

407 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20662884)

  • 1. Reattachment of anterior fractured teeth: effect of materials and techniques on impact strength.
    Bruschi-Alonso RC; Alonso RC; Correr GM; Alves MC; Lewgoy HR; Sinhoreti MA; Puppin-Rontani RM; Correr-Sobrinho L
    Dent Traumatol; 2010 Aug; 26(4):315-22. PubMed ID: 20662884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fracture resistance of re-attached coronal fragments--influence of different adhesive materials and bevel preparation.
    Demarco FF; Fay RM; Pinzon LM; Powers JM
    Dent Traumatol; 2004 Jun; 20(3):157-63. PubMed ID: 15144447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reattachment of rehydrated dental fragment using two techniques.
    Capp CI; Roda MI; Tamaki R; Castanho GM; Camargo MA; de Cara AA
    Dent Traumatol; 2009 Feb; 25(1):95-9. PubMed ID: 19208019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Performance of techniques used for re-attachment of endodontically treated crown fractured teeth.
    Loguercio AD; Leski G; Sossmeier D; Kraul A; Oda M; Patzlaff RT; Reis A
    J Dent; 2008 Apr; 36(4):249-55. PubMed ID: 18308450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Compressive strength recovery by composite onlays in primary teeth. Substrate treatment and luting agent effects.
    Borges AF; Correr GM; Sinhoreti MA; Consani S; Sobrinho LC; Rontani RM
    J Dent; 2006 Aug; 34(7):478-84. PubMed ID: 16427182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fracture strength of fragment-bonded teeth. Effect of calcium hydroxide lining before bonding.
    Farik B; Munksgaard EC; Andreasen JO
    Am J Dent; 2000 Apr; 13(2):98-100. PubMed ID: 11764835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of fracture resistance of teeth restored with ceramic inlay and resin composite: an in vitro study.
    Desai PD; Das UK
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(6):877. PubMed ID: 22484893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Adhesive bonding of fractured anterior teeth: effect of wet technique and rewetting agent.
    Farik B; Munksgaard EC; Suh BI; Andreasen JO; Kreiborg S
    Am J Dent; 1998 Dec; 11(6):251-3. PubMed ID: 10477974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fracture resistance of tooth fragment reattachment: effects of different preparation techniques and adhesive materials.
    Pusman E; Cehreli ZC; Altay N; Unver B; Saracbasi O; Ozgun G
    Dent Traumatol; 2010 Feb; 26(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 20089057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of immediate dentin sealing on the marginal adaptation and bond strengths of total-etch and self-etch adhesives.
    Duarte S; de Freitas CR; Saad JR; Sadan A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jul; 102(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 19573687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bond strength of self-etching primers to enamel and dentin of primary teeth.
    Agostini FG; Kaaden C; Powers JM
    Pediatr Dent; 2001; 23(6):481-6. PubMed ID: 11800447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fracture strength of intact and fragment-bonded teeth at various velocities of the applied force.
    Farik B; Munksgaard EC
    Eur J Oral Sci; 1999 Feb; 107(1):70-3. PubMed ID: 10102753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fracture strength of endodontically treated teeth restored with different strategies after mechanical cycling.
    Rosa R; Hwas A; Melo D; Valandro LF; Kaizer O
    Gen Dent; 2012; 60(2):e62-8. PubMed ID: 22414519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of fractured or sectioned fragments on the fracture strength of different reattachment techniques.
    Loguercio AD; Mengarda J; Amaral R; Kraul A; Reis A
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(3):295-300. PubMed ID: 15195730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of the fracture resistance of reattached incisal fragments using different materials and techniques.
    Chazine M; Sedda M; Ounsi HF; Paragliola R; Ferrari M; Grandini S
    Dent Traumatol; 2011 Feb; 27(1):15-8. PubMed ID: 21244624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In vitro study comparing fracture strength recovery of teeth restored with three esthetic bonding materials using different techniques.
    Rajput A; Ataide I; Lambor R; Monteiro J; Tar M; Wadhawan N
    Eur J Esthet Dent; 2010; 5(4):398-411. PubMed ID: 21069110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dentin bonding of an etch-and-rinse adhesive using self- and light-cured composites.
    Walter R; Swift EJ; Ritter AV; Bartholomew WW; Gibson CG
    Am J Dent; 2009 Aug; 22(4):215-8. PubMed ID: 19824557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of airborne-particle abrasion on mechanical properties and bond strength of carbon/epoxy and glass/bis-GMA fiber-reinforced resin posts.
    Soares CJ; Santana FR; Pereira JC; Araujo TS; Menezes MS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Jun; 99(6):444-54. PubMed ID: 18514666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fracture strength of tooth fragment reattachments with postpone bevel and overcontour reconstruction.
    Stellini E; Stomaci D; Stomaci M; Petrone N; Favero L
    Dent Traumatol; 2008 Jun; 24(3):283-8. PubMed ID: 18489478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fracture resistance of anterior teeth restored with a novel nonmetallic post.
    Abo El-Ela OA; Atta OA; El-Mowafy O
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2008 Jun; 74(5):441. PubMed ID: 18538068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.