These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20663670)

  • 1. Normal pressure values and repeatability of the Emed® ST2 system.
    Maetzler M; Bochdansky T; Abboud RJ
    Gait Posture; 2010 Jul; 32(3):391-4. PubMed ID: 20663670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Normal pressure values and repeatability of the Emed ST4 system.
    Putti AB; Arnold GP; Cochrane LA; Abboud RJ
    Gait Posture; 2008 Apr; 27(3):501-5. PubMed ID: 17702582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of the dynamic pedobarograph and EMED systems for measuring dynamic foot pressures.
    Quaney B; Meyer K; Cornwall MW; McPoil TG
    Foot Ankle Int; 1995 Sep; 16(9):562-6. PubMed ID: 8563925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of partial weight bearing in a walking boot on plantar pressure distribution and center of pressure.
    North K; Potter MQ; Kubiak EN; Bamberg SJ; Hitchcock RW
    Gait Posture; 2012 Jul; 36(3):646-9. PubMed ID: 22633830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Between-day reliability of repeated plantar pressure distribution measurements in a normal population.
    Gurney JK; Kersting UG; Rosenbaum D
    Gait Posture; 2008 May; 27(4):706-9. PubMed ID: 17693087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The EMED System of foot pressure analysis.
    Graf PM
    Clin Podiatr Med Surg; 1993 Jul; 10(3):445-54. PubMed ID: 8364847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Repeatability of the Pedar-X in-shoe pressure measuring system.
    Ramanathan AK; Kiran P; Arnold GP; Wang W; Abboud RJ
    Foot Ankle Surg; 2010 Jun; 16(2):70-3. PubMed ID: 20483137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Static and dynamic plantar pressure measurements in adolescents].
    Tuna H; Yildiz M; Celtik C; Kokino S
    Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2004; 38(3):200-5. PubMed ID: 15347920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of early walking patterns from plantar pressure distribution measurements. First year results of 42 children.
    Bertsch C; Unger H; Winkelmann W; Rosenbaum D
    Gait Posture; 2004 Jun; 19(3):235-42. PubMed ID: 15125912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Normal foot loading parameters and repeatability of the Footscan® platform system.
    Xu C; Wen XX; Huang LY; Shang L; Cheng XX; Yan YB; Lei W
    J Foot Ankle Res; 2017; 10():30. PubMed ID: 28725271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Normal values of plantar pressure measurements determined using the EMED-SF system.
    Bryant AR; Tinley P; Singer KP
    J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 2000 Jun; 90(6):295-9. PubMed ID: 10881460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dynamic plantar pressure parameters associated with static arch height index during gait.
    Teyhen DS; Stoltenberg BE; Collinsworth KM; Giesel CL; Williams DG; Kardouni CH; Molloy JM; Goffar SL; Christie DS; McPoil T
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2009 May; 24(4):391-6. PubMed ID: 19246138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of shoe lacing on plantar pressure distribution and in-shoe displacement of the foot in healthy participants.
    Fiedler KE; Stuijfzand WJ; Harlaar J; Dekker J; Beckerman H
    Gait Posture; 2011 Mar; 33(3):396-400. PubMed ID: 21215637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of the transverse metatarsal arch of the foot with gait analysis.
    Kanatli U; Yetkin H; Bolukbasi S
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2003 May; 123(4):148-50. PubMed ID: 12734711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Test-retest reliability and descriptive statistics of geometric measurements based on plantar pressure measurements in a healthy population during gait.
    Akins JS; Keenan KA; Sell TC; Abt JP; Lephart SM
    Gait Posture; 2012 Jan; 35(1):167-9. PubMed ID: 21917456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Pedar in-shoe system: repeatability and normal pressure values.
    Putti AB; Arnold GP; Cochrane L; Abboud RJ
    Gait Posture; 2007 Mar; 25(3):401-5. PubMed ID: 16828288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of custom-made braces for the ankle and hindfoot on ankle and foot kinematics and ground reaction forces.
    Kitaoka HB; Crevoisier XM; Harbst K; Hansen D; Kotajarvi B; Kaufman K
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2006 Jan; 87(1):130-5. PubMed ID: 16401451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The relationship between obstacle height and center of pressure velocity during obstacle crossing.
    Wang Y; Watanabe K
    Gait Posture; 2008 Jan; 27(1):172-5. PubMed ID: 17416525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [The tripod support of the foot. An analysis of pressure distribution under static and dynamic loading].
    Hennig EM; Milani TL
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1993; 131(3):279-84. PubMed ID: 8342316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ground contact characteristics of Tai Chi gait.
    Wu G; Hitt J
    Gait Posture; 2005 Aug; 22(1):32-9. PubMed ID: 15996589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.