476 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20664028)
1. Cost-effectiveness of computed tomographic colonography screening for colorectal cancer in the medicare population.
Knudsen AB; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Rutter CM; Savarino JE; van Ballegooijen M; Kuntz KM; Zauber AG
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2010 Aug; 102(16):1238-52. PubMed ID: 20664028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative economic evaluation of data from the ACRIN National CT Colonography Trial with three cancer intervention and surveillance modeling network microsimulations.
Vanness DJ; Knudsen AB; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Rutter CM; Gareen IF; Herman BA; Kuntz KM; Zauber AG; van Ballegooijen M; Feuer EJ; Chen MH; Johnson CD
Radiology; 2011 Nov; 261(2):487-98. PubMed ID: 21813740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cost-effectiveness modeling of colorectal cancer: computed tomography colonography vs colonoscopy or fecal occult blood tests.
Lucidarme O; Cadi M; Berger G; Taieb J; Poynard T; Grenier P; Beresniak A
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Jul; 81(7):1413-9. PubMed ID: 21444171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Speaking for the evidence: colonoscopy vs computed tomographic colonography.
Harris R
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2010 Aug; 102(16):1212-4. PubMed ID: 20651321
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Rescreening of persons with a negative colonoscopy result: results from a microsimulation model.
Knudsen AB; Hur C; Gazelle GS; Schrag D; McFarland EG; Kuntz KM
Ann Intern Med; 2012 Nov; 157(9):611-20. PubMed ID: 23128861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cost-effectiveness of colonoscopy in screening for colorectal cancer.
Sonnenberg A; Delcò F; Inadomi JM
Ann Intern Med; 2000 Oct; 133(8):573-84. PubMed ID: 11033584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. CT colonography to screen for colorectal cancer and aortic aneurysm in the Medicare population: cost-effectiveness analysis.
Pickhardt PJ; Hassan C; Laghi A; Kim DH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 May; 192(5):1332-40. PubMed ID: 19380558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Medicare cost of colorectal cancer screening: CT colonography vs. optical colonoscopy.
Pyenson B; Pickhardt PJ; Sawhney TG; Berrios M
Abdom Imaging; 2015 Oct; 40(8):2966-76. PubMed ID: 26350285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cost effectiveness of CT colonography for UK NHS colorectal cancer screening of asymptomatic adults aged 60-69 years.
Lee D; Muston D; Sweet A; Cunningham C; Slater A; Lock K
Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2010; 8(3):141-54. PubMed ID: 20369905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Estimation of Benefits, Burden, and Harms of Colorectal Cancer Screening Strategies: Modeling Study for the US Preventive Services Task Force.
Knudsen AB; Zauber AG; Rutter CM; Naber SK; Doria-Rose VP; Pabiniak C; Johanson C; Fischer SE; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Kuntz KM
JAMA; 2016 Jun; 315(23):2595-609. PubMed ID: 27305518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening with computed tomography colonography: the impact of not reporting diminutive lesions.
Pickhardt PJ; Hassan C; Laghi A; Zullo A; Kim DH; Morini S
Cancer; 2007 Jun; 109(11):2213-21. PubMed ID: 17455218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cost-effectiveness of screening for colorectal cancer in the general population.
Frazier AL; Colditz GA; Fuchs CS; Kuntz KM
JAMA; 2000 Oct; 284(15):1954-61. PubMed ID: 11035892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Population screening for colorectal cancer by flexible sigmoidoscopy or CT colonography: study protocol for a multicenter randomized trial.
Regge D; Iussich G; Senore C; Correale L; Hassan C; Bert A; Montemezzi S; Segnan N
Trials; 2014 Mar; 15():97. PubMed ID: 24678896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of the benefits, harms and cost-effectiveness of potential alternatives to iFOBT testing for colorectal cancer screening in Australia.
Lew JB; St John DJB; Macrae FA; Emery JD; Ee HC; Jenkins MA; He E; Grogan P; Caruana M; Sarfati D; Greuter MJE; Coupé VMH; Canfell K
Int J Cancer; 2018 Jul; 143(2):269-282. PubMed ID: 29441568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Screening for colorectal cancer with FOBT, virtual colonoscopy and optical colonoscopy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial in the Florence district (SAVE study).
Sali L; Grazzini G; Carozzi F; Castiglione G; Falchini M; Mallardi B; Mantellini P; Ventura L; Regge D; Zappa M; Mascalchi M; Milani S
Trials; 2013 Mar; 14():74. PubMed ID: 23497601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An international review of the main cost-effectiveness drivers of virtual colonography versus conventional colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening: is the tide changing due to adherence?
Kriza C; Emmert M; Wahlster P; Niederländer C; Kolominsky-Rabas P
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Nov; 82(11):e629-36. PubMed ID: 23938237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Colorectal Cancer: Cost-effectiveness of Colonoscopy versus CT Colonography Screening with Participation Rates and Costs.
van der Meulen MP; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Goede SL; Kuipers EJ; Dekker E; Stoker J; van Ballegooijen M
Radiology; 2018 Jun; 287(3):901-911. PubMed ID: 29485322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Stool DNA testing to screen for colorectal cancer in the Medicare population: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Kuntz KM; Knudsen AB; Wilschut JA; Zauber AG; van Ballegooijen M
Ann Intern Med; 2010 Sep; 153(6):368-77. PubMed ID: 20855801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. What is the value of computered tomography colonography in patients screening positive for fecal occult blood? A systematic review and economic evaluation.
Walleser S; Griffiths A; Lord SJ; Howard K; Solomon MJ; Gebski V
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2007 Dec; 5(12):1439-46; quiz 1368. PubMed ID: 18054752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
