These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

488 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20664028)

  • 1. Cost-effectiveness of computed tomographic colonography screening for colorectal cancer in the medicare population.
    Knudsen AB; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Rutter CM; Savarino JE; van Ballegooijen M; Kuntz KM; Zauber AG
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2010 Aug; 102(16):1238-52. PubMed ID: 20664028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative economic evaluation of data from the ACRIN National CT Colonography Trial with three cancer intervention and surveillance modeling network microsimulations.
    Vanness DJ; Knudsen AB; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Rutter CM; Gareen IF; Herman BA; Kuntz KM; Zauber AG; van Ballegooijen M; Feuer EJ; Chen MH; Johnson CD
    Radiology; 2011 Nov; 261(2):487-98. PubMed ID: 21813740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cost-effectiveness modeling of colorectal cancer: computed tomography colonography vs colonoscopy or fecal occult blood tests.
    Lucidarme O; Cadi M; Berger G; Taieb J; Poynard T; Grenier P; Beresniak A
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Jul; 81(7):1413-9. PubMed ID: 21444171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Speaking for the evidence: colonoscopy vs computed tomographic colonography.
    Harris R
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2010 Aug; 102(16):1212-4. PubMed ID: 20651321
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Rescreening of persons with a negative colonoscopy result: results from a microsimulation model.
    Knudsen AB; Hur C; Gazelle GS; Schrag D; McFarland EG; Kuntz KM
    Ann Intern Med; 2012 Nov; 157(9):611-20. PubMed ID: 23128861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cost-effectiveness of colonoscopy in screening for colorectal cancer.
    Sonnenberg A; Delcò F; Inadomi JM
    Ann Intern Med; 2000 Oct; 133(8):573-84. PubMed ID: 11033584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. CT colonography to screen for colorectal cancer and aortic aneurysm in the Medicare population: cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Pickhardt PJ; Hassan C; Laghi A; Kim DH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 May; 192(5):1332-40. PubMed ID: 19380558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Medicare cost of colorectal cancer screening: CT colonography vs. optical colonoscopy.
    Pyenson B; Pickhardt PJ; Sawhney TG; Berrios M
    Abdom Imaging; 2015 Oct; 40(8):2966-76. PubMed ID: 26350285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cost effectiveness of CT colonography for UK NHS colorectal cancer screening of asymptomatic adults aged 60-69 years.
    Lee D; Muston D; Sweet A; Cunningham C; Slater A; Lock K
    Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2010; 8(3):141-54. PubMed ID: 20369905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimation of Benefits, Burden, and Harms of Colorectal Cancer Screening Strategies: Modeling Study for the US Preventive Services Task Force.
    Knudsen AB; Zauber AG; Rutter CM; Naber SK; Doria-Rose VP; Pabiniak C; Johanson C; Fischer SE; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Kuntz KM
    JAMA; 2016 Jun; 315(23):2595-609. PubMed ID: 27305518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening with computed tomography colonography: the impact of not reporting diminutive lesions.
    Pickhardt PJ; Hassan C; Laghi A; Zullo A; Kim DH; Morini S
    Cancer; 2007 Jun; 109(11):2213-21. PubMed ID: 17455218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cost-effectiveness of screening for colorectal cancer in the general population.
    Frazier AL; Colditz GA; Fuchs CS; Kuntz KM
    JAMA; 2000 Oct; 284(15):1954-61. PubMed ID: 11035892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Population screening for colorectal cancer by flexible sigmoidoscopy or CT colonography: study protocol for a multicenter randomized trial.
    Regge D; Iussich G; Senore C; Correale L; Hassan C; Bert A; Montemezzi S; Segnan N
    Trials; 2014 Mar; 15():97. PubMed ID: 24678896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of the benefits, harms and cost-effectiveness of potential alternatives to iFOBT testing for colorectal cancer screening in Australia.
    Lew JB; St John DJB; Macrae FA; Emery JD; Ee HC; Jenkins MA; He E; Grogan P; Caruana M; Sarfati D; Greuter MJE; Coupé VMH; Canfell K
    Int J Cancer; 2018 Jul; 143(2):269-282. PubMed ID: 29441568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Screening for colorectal cancer with FOBT, virtual colonoscopy and optical colonoscopy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial in the Florence district (SAVE study).
    Sali L; Grazzini G; Carozzi F; Castiglione G; Falchini M; Mallardi B; Mantellini P; Ventura L; Regge D; Zappa M; Mascalchi M; Milani S
    Trials; 2013 Mar; 14():74. PubMed ID: 23497601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An international review of the main cost-effectiveness drivers of virtual colonography versus conventional colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening: is the tide changing due to adherence?
    Kriza C; Emmert M; Wahlster P; Niederländer C; Kolominsky-Rabas P
    Eur J Radiol; 2013 Nov; 82(11):e629-36. PubMed ID: 23938237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Colorectal Cancer: Cost-effectiveness of Colonoscopy versus CT Colonography Screening with Participation Rates and Costs.
    van der Meulen MP; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Goede SL; Kuipers EJ; Dekker E; Stoker J; van Ballegooijen M
    Radiology; 2018 Jun; 287(3):901-911. PubMed ID: 29485322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Stool DNA testing to screen for colorectal cancer in the Medicare population: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Kuntz KM; Knudsen AB; Wilschut JA; Zauber AG; van Ballegooijen M
    Ann Intern Med; 2010 Sep; 153(6):368-77. PubMed ID: 20855801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. What is the value of computered tomography colonography in patients screening positive for fecal occult blood? A systematic review and economic evaluation.
    Walleser S; Griffiths A; Lord SJ; Howard K; Solomon MJ; Gebski V
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2007 Dec; 5(12):1439-46; quiz 1368. PubMed ID: 18054752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.