These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2066473)

  • 1. Listening preferences for voice types as a function of age.
    Hollien H; Gelfer MP; Carlson T
    J Commun Disord; 1991 Apr; 24(2):157-71. PubMed ID: 2066473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of age on speech and voice quality ratings.
    Goy H; Kathleen Pichora-Fuller M; van Lieshout P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Apr; 139(4):1648. PubMed ID: 27106312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perception of pitch location within a speaker's range: fundamental frequency, voice quality and speaker sex.
    Bishop J; Keating P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):1100-12. PubMed ID: 22894229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Jena Speaker Set (JESS)-A database of voice stimuli from unfamiliar young and old adult speakers.
    Zäske R; Skuk VG; Golle J; Schweinberger SR
    Behav Res Methods; 2020 Jun; 52(3):990-1007. PubMed ID: 31637667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ratings of vocal pleasantness and the aging process.
    Deal LV; Oyer HJ
    Folia Phoniatr (Basel); 1991; 43(1):44-8. PubMed ID: 2071075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Angry, old, male - and trustworthy? How expressive and person voice characteristics shape listener trust.
    Schirmer A; Chiu MH; Lo C; Feng YJ; Penney TB
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(5):e0232431. PubMed ID: 32365066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Speaking rate and fundamental frequency as speech cues to perceived age.
    Harnsberger JD; Shrivastav R; Brown WS; Rothman H; Hollien H
    J Voice; 2008 Jan; 22(1):58-69. PubMed ID: 16968663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Low Vocal Pitch Preference Drives First Impressions Irrespective of Context in Male Voices but Not in Female Voices.
    Tsantani MS; Belin P; Paterson HM; McAleer P
    Perception; 2016 Aug; 45(8):946-963. PubMed ID: 27081101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Synthetic and natural speech preferences of male and female listeners in four age groups.
    Mirenda P; Eicher D; Beukelman DR
    J Speech Hear Res; 1989 Mar; 32(1):175-83. PubMed ID: 2523007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A preliminary study on the use of vocal function exercises to improve voice in male-to-female transgender clients.
    Gelfer MP; Van Dong BR
    J Voice; 2013 May; 27(3):321-34. PubMed ID: 23159032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of vocal disguise on estimations of speakers' ages.
    Lass NJ; Justice LA; George BD; Baldwin LM; Scherbick KA; Wright DL
    Percept Mot Skills; 1982 Jun; 54(3 Pt 2):1311-5. PubMed ID: 7110873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sources of listener disagreement in voice quality assessment.
    Kreiman J; Gerratt BR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Oct; 108(4):1867-76. PubMed ID: 11051513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of speaker gender on listener judgments of tracheoesophageal speech.
    Eadie TL; Doyle PC; Hansen K; Beaudin PG
    J Voice; 2008 Jan; 22(1):43-57. PubMed ID: 17055223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Judgments of Intelligence and Likability of Young Adult Female Speakers of American English: The Influence of Vocal Fry and the Surrounding Acoustic-Prosodic Context.
    Parker MA; Borrie SA
    J Voice; 2018 Sep; 32(5):538-545. PubMed ID: 28958872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Noise and tremor in the perception of vocal aging in males.
    Harnsberger JD; Brown WS; Shrivastav R; Rothman H
    J Voice; 2010 Sep; 24(5):523-30. PubMed ID: 19815378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Development and evaluation of the listening in spatialized noise test.
    Cameron S; Dillon H; Newall P
    Ear Hear; 2006 Feb; 27(1):30-42. PubMed ID: 16446563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sex Differences in Pitch Range and Speech Fundamental Frequency After Arytenoid Adduction and Thyroplasty.
    Konomi U; Watanabe Y; Komazawa D
    J Voice; 2016 May; 30(3):362-70. PubMed ID: 25998408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of fundamental frequency on judgments of electrolaryngeal speech.
    Nagle KF; Eadie TL; Wright DR; Sumida YA
    Am J Speech Lang Pathol; 2012 May; 21(2):154-66. PubMed ID: 22355005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Inferring speaker attributes in adductor spasmodic dysphonia: ratings from unfamiliar listeners.
    Isetti D; Xuereb L; Eadie TL
    Am J Speech Lang Pathol; 2014 May; 23(2):134-45. PubMed ID: 24686338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Intelligibility of emotional speech in younger and older adults.
    Dupuis K; Pichora-Fuller MK
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(6):695-707. PubMed ID: 25127327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.