123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20664827)
1. Estimation of clinically important change for visual analog scales measuring chronic temporomandibular disorder pain.
Emshoff R; Emshoff I; Bertram S
J Orofac Pain; 2010; 24(3):262-9. PubMed ID: 20664827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Patient-perceived satisfactory improvement (PPSI): interpreting meaningful change in pain from the patient's perspective.
ten Klooster PM; Drossaers-Bakker KW; Taal E; van de Laar MA
Pain; 2006 Mar; 121(1-2):151-7. PubMed ID: 16472915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Neck Disability Index, short form-36 physical component summary, and pain scales for neck and arm pain: the minimum clinically important difference and substantial clinical benefit after cervical spine fusion.
Carreon LY; Glassman SD; Campbell MJ; Anderson PA
Spine J; 2010 Jun; 10(6):469-74. PubMed ID: 20359958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Statistically and clinically important change of pain scores in patients with myogenous temporomandibular disorders.
van Grootel RJ; van der Glas HW
Eur J Pain; 2009 May; 13(5):506-10. PubMed ID: 18657456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Time courses of myofascial temporomandibular disorder complaints during a 12-month follow-up period.
van Selms MK; Lobbezoo F; Naeije M
J Orofac Pain; 2009; 23(4):345-52. PubMed ID: 19888486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Long-term reliable change of pain scores in individual myogenous TMD patients.
van Grootel RJ; van der Bilt A; van der Glas HW
Eur J Pain; 2007 Aug; 11(6):635-43. PubMed ID: 17118682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Minimal clinically important change for pain intensity and disability in patients with nonspecific low back pain.
Kovacs FM; Abraira V; Royuela A; Corcoll J; Alegre L; Cano A; Muriel A; Zamora J; del Real MT; Gestoso M; Mufraggi N
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Dec; 32(25):2915-20. PubMed ID: 18246018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The reproducibility and responsiveness of a patient-specific approach: a new instrument in evaluation of treatment of temporomandibular disorders.
Rollman A; Naeije M; Visscher CM
J Orofac Pain; 2010; 24(1):101-5. PubMed ID: 20213035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Minimal clinically important changes in chronic musculoskeletal pain intensity measured on a numerical rating scale.
Salaffi F; Stancati A; Silvestri CA; Ciapetti A; Grassi W
Eur J Pain; 2004 Aug; 8(4):283-91. PubMed ID: 15207508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinically important difference thresholds of the visual analog scale: a conceptual model for identifying meaningful intraindividual changes for pain intensity.
Emshoff R; Bertram S; Emshoff I
Pain; 2011 Oct; 152(10):2277-2282. PubMed ID: 21726939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Responsiveness and minimal clinically important change of the Pain Disability Index in patients with chronic back pain.
Soer R; Reneman MF; Vroomen PC; Stegeman P; Coppes MH
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Apr; 37(8):711-5. PubMed ID: 21796022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Longitudinal outcome of temporomandibular disorders: a 5-year epidemiologic study of muscle disorders defined by research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders.
Rammelsberg P; LeResche L; Dworkin S; Mancl L
J Orofac Pain; 2003; 17(1):9-20. PubMed ID: 12756926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prospective analysis of clinical evaluation and self-assessment by patients after decompression surgery for degenerative lumbar canal stenosis.
Haro H; Maekawa S; Hamada Y
Spine J; 2008; 8(2):380-4. PubMed ID: 17433781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Short-term effectiveness of a prefabricated occlusal appliance in patients with myofascial pain.
Nilner M; Ekberg E; Doepel M; Andersson J; Selovuo K; Le Bell Y
J Orofac Pain; 2008; 22(3):209-18. PubMed ID: 18780534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Responsiveness of visual analogue and McGill pain scale measures.
Scrimshaw SV; Maher C
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2001 Oct; 24(8):501-4. PubMed ID: 11677548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinically significant changes in pain along the visual analog scale.
Bird SB; Dickson EW
Ann Emerg Med; 2001 Dec; 38(6):639-43. PubMed ID: 11719742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Generic pain intensity scores are affected by painful comorbidity.
Türp JC; Kowalski CJ; Stohler CS
J Orofac Pain; 2000; 14(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 11203737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prediction of treatment-seeking behavior in acute TMD patients: practical application in clinical settings.
Epker J; Gatchel RJ
J Orofac Pain; 2000; 14(4):303-9. PubMed ID: 11203764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire as an outcome measure: test-retest reliability and responsiveness to change.
Strand LI; Ljunggren AE; Bogen B; Ask T; Johnsen TB
Eur J Pain; 2008 Oct; 12(7):917-25. PubMed ID: 18289893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pain intensity, illness duration, and protein catabolism in temporomandibular disorder patients with chronic muscle pain.
McGregor NR; Zerbes M; Niblett SH; Dunstan RH; Roberts TK; Butt HL; Klineberg IJ
J Orofac Pain; 2003; 17(2):112-24. PubMed ID: 12836499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
