123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20664827)
21. Daily pain coping among patients with chronic temporomandibular disorder pain: an electronic diary study.
Aaron LA; Turner JA; Mancl LA; Sawchuk CN; Huggins KH; Truelove EL
J Orofac Pain; 2006; 20(2):125-37. PubMed ID: 16708830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A method for clinically defining "improvers" in chronic pain studies.
Wassell RW; Moufti MA; Meechan JG; Steen IN; Steele JG
J Orofac Pain; 2008; 22(1):30-40. PubMed ID: 18351032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The clinical importance of changes in outcome scores after treatment for chronic low back pain.
Hägg O; Fritzell P; Nordwall A;
Eur Spine J; 2003 Feb; 12(1):12-20. PubMed ID: 12592542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Pressure-pain threshold variation in temporomandibular disorder myalgia over the course of the menstrual cycle.
Isselée H; De Laat A; De Mot B; Lysens R
J Orofac Pain; 2002; 16(2):105-17. PubMed ID: 12043517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The minimally important difference for the health assessment questionnaire in rheumatoid arthritis clinical practice is smaller than in randomized controlled trials.
Pope JE; Khanna D; Norrie D; Ouimet JM
J Rheumatol; 2009 Feb; 36(2):254-9. PubMed ID: 19132791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Is a condition-specific instrument for patients with low back pain/leg symptoms really necessary? The responsiveness of the Oswestry Disability Index, MODEMS, and the SF-36.
Walsh TL; Hanscom B; Lurie JD; Weinstein JN
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Mar; 28(6):607-15. PubMed ID: 12642770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Long-term follow-up of the CAD/CAM patient fitted total temporomandibular joint reconstruction system.
Mercuri LG; Wolford LM; Sanders B; White RD; Giobbie-Hurder A
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2002 Dec; 60(12):1440-8. PubMed ID: 12465008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale was responsive and showed reasonable interpretability after a multidisciplinary treatment.
Demoulin C; Ostelo R; Knottnerus JA; Smeets RJ
J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Nov; 63(11):1249-55. PubMed ID: 20400266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Depression, pain, exposure to stressful life events, and long-term outcomes in temporomandibular disorder patients.
Auerbach SM; Laskin DM; Frantsve LM; Orr T
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2001 Jun; 59(6):628-33; discussion 634. PubMed ID: 11381383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Assessing the clinical significance of change scores recorded on subjective outcome measures.
Hurst H; Bolton J
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2004 Jan; 27(1):26-35. PubMed ID: 14739871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Reproducibility of pressure pain threshold and visual analog scale findings in chronic whiplash patients.
Prushansky T; Handelzalts S; Pevzner E
Clin J Pain; 2007 May; 23(4):339-45. PubMed ID: 17449995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Experimental chewing in myofascial pain patients.
Gavish A; Winocur E; Menashe S; Halachmi M; Eli I; Gazit E
J Orofac Pain; 2002; 16(1):22-8. PubMed ID: 11889656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A randomized clinical trial of a tailored comprehensive care treatment program for temporomandibular disorders.
Dworkin SF; Turner JA; Mancl L; Wilson L; Massoth D; Huggins KH; LeResche L; Truelove E
J Orofac Pain; 2002; 16(4):259-76. PubMed ID: 12455427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Reduced neuropsychologic measures as predictors of treatment outcome in patients with temporomandibular disorders.
Grossi ML; Goldberg MB; Locker D; Tenenbaum HC
J Orofac Pain; 2001; 15(4):329-39. PubMed ID: 12400401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A visual analog scale can assess the effect of surgical treatment in children with chronic otitis media with effusion.
Datema FR; Vemer-van den Hoek JG; Wieringa MH; Mulder PM; Baatenburg de Jong RJ; Blom HM
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2008 Apr; 72(4):461-7. PubMed ID: 18249447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Minimal clinically important change for pain intensity, functional status, and general health status in patients with nonspecific low back pain.
van der Roer N; Ostelo RW; Bekkering GE; van Tulder MW; de Vet HC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Mar; 31(5):578-82. PubMed ID: 16508555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Prospective validation of clinically important changes in pain severity measured on a visual analog scale.
Gallagher EJ; Liebman M; Bijur PE
Ann Emerg Med; 2001 Dec; 38(6):633-8. PubMed ID: 11719741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Brush-evoked allodynia predicts outcome of spinal cord stimulation in complex regional pain syndrome type 1.
van Eijs F; Smits H; Geurts JW; Kessels AG; Kemler MA; van Kleef M; Joosten EA; Faber CG
Eur J Pain; 2010 Feb; 14(2):164-9. PubMed ID: 19942463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The clinical importance of changes in the 0 to 10 numeric rating scale for worst, least, and average pain intensity: analyses of data from clinical trials of duloxetine in pain disorders.
Farrar JT; Pritchett YL; Robinson M; Prakash A; Chappell A
J Pain; 2010 Feb; 11(2):109-18. PubMed ID: 19665938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Short-term treatment of a resilient appliance in TMD pain patients: a randomized controlled trial.
Nilsson H; Limchaichana N; Nilner M; Ekberg EC
J Oral Rehabil; 2009 Aug; 36(8):547-55. PubMed ID: 19604318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
