These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20667218)

  • 1. The principle of digital subtraction angiography and radiological protection.
    Okamoto K; Ito J; Sakai K; Yoshimura S
    Interv Neuroradiol; 2000 Nov; 6 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):25-31. PubMed ID: 20667218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pediatric patient surface doses in neuroangiography.
    Swoboda NA; Armstrong DG; Smith J; Charkot E; Connolly BL
    Pediatr Radiol; 2005 Sep; 35(9):859-66. PubMed ID: 15918052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Evaluation and estimation of entrance skin dose in patients during diagnostic and interventional radiology procedures].
    Iida H; Horii J; Chabatake M; Taka E; Shimizu M; Mizushima T
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2004 Jan; 60(1):126-35. PubMed ID: 15041915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Organ doses from cardiac and carotid digital subtraction angiography.
    Mustafa AA; Janeczek J
    Br J Radiol; 1989 Sep; 62(741):838-42. PubMed ID: 2790424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dual-energy CT angiography in the evaluation of intracranial aneurysms: image quality, radiation dose, and comparison with 3D rotational digital subtraction angiography.
    Zhang LJ; Wu SY; Niu JB; Zhang ZL; Wang HZ; Zhao YE; Chai X; Zhou CS; Lu GM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Jan; 194(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 20028901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of radiographic techniques (kVp and mAs) on image quality and patient doses in digital subtraction angiography.
    Gkanatsios NA; Huda W; Peters KR
    Med Phys; 2002 Aug; 29(8):1643-50. PubMed ID: 12201409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Multicenter Evaluation of Cine Angiography and Digital Subtraction Angiography Dose Rate for Various Angiography Programs: Comparison with Fluoroscopic Dose Rate].
    Takeda K; Hayashi T; Sakiyama K; Hasegawa R; Watanabe Y; Tajima O; Tsukamoto A; Sato H
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2021; 77(7):718-725. PubMed ID: 34305058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Somatic and genetic radiation exposure of the patient in digital subtraction angiography (DSA).
    Neufang KF; Ewen K
    Eur J Radiol; 1986 Aug; 6(3):222-5. PubMed ID: 3533543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimation of patient dose and associated radiogenic risks from fluoroscopically guided pedicle screw insertion.
    Perisinakis K; Theocharopoulos N; Damilakis J; Katonis P; Papadokostakis G; Hadjipavlou A; Gourtsoyiannis N
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Jul; 29(14):1555-60. PubMed ID: 15247578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reduced Patient Radiation Exposure during Neurodiagnostic and Interventional X-Ray Angiography with a New Imaging Platform.
    van der Marel K; Vedantham S; van der Bom IM; Howk M; Narain T; Ty K; Karellas A; Gounis MJ; Puri AS; Wakhloo AK
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2017 Mar; 38(3):442-449. PubMed ID: 28104643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Analysis of Radiation Doses and Dose Reduction Strategies During Cerebral Digital Subtraction Angiography.
    Yi HJ; Sung JH; Lee DH; Kim SW; Lee SW
    World Neurosurg; 2017 Apr; 100():216-223. PubMed ID: 28089806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Estimated radiation dose according to the craniocaudal angle in cerebral digital subtraction angiography: Patient and phantom study.
    Song Y; Kim Y; Han S; Kim TI; Choi JH; Maeng JY; Choi Y; Lee DH
    J Neuroradiol; 2019 Nov; 46(6):345-350. PubMed ID: 31323303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Thyroid dose during neurointerventional procedures: does lead shielding reduce the dose?
    Shortt CP; Fanning NF; Malone L; Thornton J; Brennan P; Lee MJ
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2007; 30(5):922-7. PubMed ID: 17533529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Digital Subtraction Angiography a Door Opener for Neurosurgical Residents who want to Perform Neurointerventional Procedures.
    Rajbhandari P; Gurung P; Rajbhandari S; Shrestha D; Acharya S; Shrestha R; Shrestha P; Shrestha J; Sharma U; Mali S; Rajbhandari R; Neupane A; Pant B
    Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ); 2021 Jan.-Mar; 19(73):118-122. PubMed ID: 34812170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Radiation exposure to operating room personnel and patients during endovascular procedures.
    Mohapatra A; Greenberg RK; Mastracci TM; Eagleton MJ; Thornsberry B
    J Vasc Surg; 2013 Sep; 58(3):702-9. PubMed ID: 23810300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Radiation exposure during digital subtraction angiography (DSA) of the kidney and aortic arch].
    Neufang KF; Ewen K
    Rofo; 1983 Sep; 139(3):300-3. PubMed ID: 6411551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effective doses in children: association with common complex imaging techniques used during interventional radiology procedures.
    Lai P; McNeil SM; Gordon CL; Connolly BL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Dec; 203(6):1336-44. PubMed ID: 25415713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Radiation dose in balloon dacryocystoplasty: a study using Rando phantoms and thermoluminescent dosimetry.
    Meriç N; Yüce UR; Ilgit ET
    Diagn Interv Radiol; 2005 Sep; 11(3):166-9. PubMed ID: 16206060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A tracking system to calculate patient skin dose in real-time during neurointerventional procedures using a biplane x-ray imaging system.
    Rana VK; Rudin S; Bednarek DR
    Med Phys; 2016 Sep; 43(9):5131. PubMed ID: 27587043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Direct Effective Dose Calculations in Pediatric Fluoroscopy-Guided Abdominal Interventions with Rando-Alderson Phantoms - Optimization of Preset Parameter Settings.
    Wildgruber M; Müller-Wille R; Goessmann H; Uller W; Wohlgemuth WA
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(8):e0161806. PubMed ID: 27556584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.