1006 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20668337)
1. Verification measurements and clinical evaluation of the iPlan RT Monte Carlo dose algorithm for 6 MV photon energy.
Petoukhova AL; van Wingerden K; Wiggenraad RG; van de Vaart PJ; van Egmond J; Franken EM; van Santvoort JP
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Aug; 55(16):4601-14. PubMed ID: 20668337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dosimetric verification and clinical evaluation of a new commercially available Monte Carlo-based dose algorithm for application in stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) treatment planning.
Fragoso M; Wen N; Kumar S; Liu D; Ryu S; Movsas B; Munther A; Chetty IJ
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Aug; 55(16):4445-64. PubMed ID: 20668343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The influence of beam model differences in the comparison of dose calculation algorithms for lung cancer treatment planning.
Chetty IJ; Rosu M; McShan DL; Fraass BA; Ten Haken RK
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):801-15. PubMed ID: 15798256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Advanced kernel methods vs. Monte Carlo-based dose calculation for high energy photon beams.
Fotina I; Winkler P; Künzler T; Reiterer J; Simmat I; Georg D
Radiother Oncol; 2009 Dec; 93(3):645-53. PubMed ID: 19926153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Experimental verification of a commercial Monte Carlo-based dose calculation module for high-energy photon beams.
Künzler T; Fotina I; Stock M; Georg D
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Dec; 54(24):7363-77. PubMed ID: 19934489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Head-and-neck IMRT treatments assessed with a Monte Carlo dose calculation engine.
Seco J; Adams E; Bidmead M; Partridge M; Verhaegen F
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):817-30. PubMed ID: 15798257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validation of the Swiss Monte Carlo Plan for a static and dynamic 6 MV photon beam.
Magaddino V; Manser P; Frei D; Volken W; Schmidhalter D; Hirschi L; Fix MK
Z Med Phys; 2011 May; 21(2):124-34. PubMed ID: 21239148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A virtual photon source model of an Elekta linear accelerator with integrated mini MLC for Monte Carlo based IMRT dose calculation.
Sikora M; Dohm O; Alber M
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Aug; 52(15):4449-63. PubMed ID: 17634643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quantitative assessment of the accuracy of dose calculation using pencil beam and Monte Carlo algorithms and requirements for clinical quality assurance.
Ali I; Ahmad S
Med Dosim; 2013; 38(3):255-61. PubMed ID: 23558145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The ArcCHECK diode array for dosimetric verification of HybridArc.
Petoukhova AL; van Egmond J; Eenink MG; Wiggenraad RG; van Santvoort JP
Phys Med Biol; 2011 Aug; 56(16):5411-28. PubMed ID: 21804180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. On the dosimetric behaviour of photon dose calculation algorithms in the presence of simple geometric heterogeneities: comparison with Monte Carlo calculations.
Fogliata A; Vanetti E; Albers D; Brink C; Clivio A; Knöös T; Nicolini G; Cozzi L
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Mar; 52(5):1363-85. PubMed ID: 17301460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Development of a Monte Carlo model for the Brainlab microMLC.
Belec J; Patrocinio H; Verhaegen F
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):787-99. PubMed ID: 15798255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A preliminary study of in-house Monte Carlo simulations: an integrated Monte Carlo verification system.
Mukumoto N; Tsujii K; Saito S; Yasunaga M; Takegawa H; Yamamoto T; Numasaki H; Teshima T
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2009 Oct; 75(2):571-9. PubMed ID: 19735883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Monte Carlo evaluation of RapidArc oropharynx treatment planning strategies for sparing of midline structures.
Bush K; Zavgorodni S; Gagne I; Townson R; Ansbacher W; Beckham W
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Aug; 55(16):4465-79. PubMed ID: 20668338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Monte Carlo- versus pencil-beam-/collapsed-cone-dose calculation in a heterogeneous multi-layer phantom.
Krieger T; Sauer OA
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):859-68. PubMed ID: 15798260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. AAA and PBC calculation accuracy in the surface build-up region in tangential beam treatments. Phantom and breast case study with the Monte Carlo code PENELOPE.
Panettieri V; Barsoum P; Westermark M; Brualla L; Lax I
Radiother Oncol; 2009 Oct; 93(1):94-101. PubMed ID: 19541380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Monte Carlo modeling of the ModuLeaf miniature MLC for small field dosimetry and quality assurance of the clinical treatment planning system.
Crop F; Reynaert N; Pittomvils G; Paelinck L; De Gersem W; De Wagter C; Vakaet L; De Neve W; Thierens H
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jun; 52(11):3275-90. PubMed ID: 17505102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of PENELOPE Monte Carlo dose calculations with Fricke dosimeter and ionization chamber measurements in heterogeneous phantoms (18 MeV electron and 12 MV photon beams).
Blazy L; Baltes D; Bordy JM; Cutarella D; Delaunay F; Gouriou J; Leroy E; Ostrowsky A; Beaumont S
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Nov; 51(22):5951-65. PubMed ID: 17068376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Monte carlo dose calculations in conventional thorax fields for 60Co photons.
Mesbahi A; Allahverdi M; Gheraati H
Radiat Med; 2005 Aug; 23(5):341-50. PubMed ID: 16342907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An efficient framework for photon Monte Carlo treatment planning.
Fix MK; Manser P; Frei D; Volken W; Mini R; Born EJ
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Oct; 52(19):N425-37. PubMed ID: 17881793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
