These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2066881)

  • 1. Effect of cavity design on gap formation in Class II composite resin restorations.
    Douvitsas G
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Apr; 65(4):475-9. PubMed ID: 2066881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reduction of cervical gaps in class II composite resin restorations.
    Ericson D; Dérand T
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Jan; 65(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 2033541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In vitro microleakage study of a condensable and flowable composite resin.
    Tung FF; Hsieh WW; Estafan D
    Gen Dent; 2000; 48(6):711-5. PubMed ID: 12004668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Marginal adaptation of composite resin-restored dentinal cavities.
    Grossman ES; Sparrius O
    J Prosthet Dent; 1990 Nov; 64(5):519-22. PubMed ID: 2090808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Marginal microleakage of resin-modified glass-ionomer and composite resin restorations: effect of using etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives.
    Khoroushi M; Karvandi TM; Kamali B; Mazaheri H
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(3):378-83. PubMed ID: 23059577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A clinical evaluation of Class II composites placed using a decoupling technique.
    Wilson NH; Cowan AJ; Unterbrink G; Wilson MA; Crisp RJ
    J Adhes Dent; 2000; 2(4):319-29. PubMed ID: 11317379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of flowable composite liner and glass ionomer liner on class II gingival marginal adaptation of direct composite restorations with different bonding strategies.
    Aggarwal V; Singla M; Yadav S; Yadav H
    J Dent; 2014 May; 42(5):619-25. PubMed ID: 24631232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Saucer-shaped cavity preparation for composite resin restorations in class II carious lesions: three-year results.
    Nordbo H; Leirskar J; von der Fehr FR
    J Prosthet Dent; 1993 Feb; 69(2):155-9. PubMed ID: 8429508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cavity wall adaptation of resin-based composites lined with flowable composites.
    Estafan D; Estafan A; Leinfelder KF
    Am J Dent; 2000 Aug; 13(4):192-4. PubMed ID: 11763929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Marginal and internal adaptation of bulk-filled Class I and Cuspal coverage direct resin composite restorations.
    Stavridakis MM; Kakaboura AI; Ardu S; Krejci I
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):515-23. PubMed ID: 17910230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Can pulpal floor debonding be detected from occlusal surface displacement in composite restorations?
    Novaes JB; Talma E; Las Casas EB; Aregawi W; Kolstad LW; Mantell S; Wang Y; Fok A
    Dent Mater; 2018 Jan; 34(1):161-169. PubMed ID: 29199007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of additional enamel etching and a flowable composite to the interfacial integrity of Class II adhesive composite restorations.
    Belli S; Inokoshi S; Ozer F; Pereira PN; Ogata M; Tagami J
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(1):70-5. PubMed ID: 11203780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Microleakage of composite and two types of glass ionomer restorations with saliva contamination at different steps.
    Farmer SN; Ludlow SW; Donaldson ME; Tantbirojn D; Versluis A
    Pediatr Dent; 2014; 36(1):14-7. PubMed ID: 24717701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Direct posterior composite restorations: simplified success through a systematic approach.
    Koczarski MJ; Corredor AC
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2002; 14(1):87-94; quiz 96. PubMed ID: 11905163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems.
    Kasraei S; Azarsina M; Majidi S
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 21702678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Proximal wear rates by tooth position of resin composite restorations.
    Wendt SL; Ziemiecki TL; Leinfelder KF
    J Dent; 1996; 24(1-2):33-9. PubMed ID: 8636490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cavity preparation devices: effect on microleakage of Class V resin-based composite restorations.
    Setien VJ; Cobb DS; Denehy GE; Vargas MA
    Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):157-62. PubMed ID: 11572294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Microleakage of composite resin restorations in cervical cavities prepared by Er,Cr:YSGG laser radiation.
    Shahabi S; Ebrahimpour L; Walsh LJ
    Aust Dent J; 2008 Jun; 53(2):172-5. PubMed ID: 18494974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of resin composite adhesion on marginal degradation.
    Kawai K; Leinfelder KF
    Dent Mater J; 1995 Dec; 14(2):211-20. PubMed ID: 8940559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of gingival fluid on marginal adaptation of Class II resin-based composite restorations.
    Spahr A; Schön F; Haller B
    Am J Dent; 2000 Oct; 13(5):261-6. PubMed ID: 11764113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.