These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2066909)

  • 1. Slip of the tongue or slip of the ear? On the perception and transcription of naturalistic slips of the tongue.
    Ferber R
    J Psycholinguist Res; 1991 Mar; 20(2):105-22. PubMed ID: 2066909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Irrelevant sound disrupts speech production: exploring the relationship between short-term memory and experimentally induced slips of the tongue.
    Saito S; Baddeley A
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2004 Oct; 57(7):1309-40. PubMed ID: 15513248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Slips of the tongue in very young children.
    Warren H
    J Psycholinguist Res; 1986 Jul; 15(4):309-44. PubMed ID: 3746727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The relationship between the perception and production of coarticulation during a sound change in progress.
    Kleber F; Harrington J; Reubold U
    Lang Speech; 2012 Sep; 55(Pt 3):383-405. PubMed ID: 23094320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Sigmund Freud, Rudolf Meringer and Carl Mayer: slips of the tongue and mis-readings. The history of a controversy].
    Hinterhuber H
    Neuropsychiatr; 2007; 21(4):291-301. PubMed ID: 18082111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Relational timing in the production and perception of Japanese singleton and geminate stops.
    Idemaru K; Guion-Anderson S
    Phonetica; 2010; 67(1-2):25-46. PubMed ID: 20798568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of the number of presentations on listener transcriptions and reliability in the assessment of speech intelligibility in children.
    Lagerberg TB; Johnels JÅ; Hartelius L; Persson C
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2015 Jul; 50(4):476-87. PubMed ID: 25588966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Productive and perceptual constraints on speech-error correction.
    Berg T
    Psychol Res; 1992; 54(2):114-26. PubMed ID: 1620795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Phonological and lexical motor facilitation during speech listening: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study.
    Roy AC; Craighero L; Fabbri-Destro M; Fadiga L
    J Physiol Paris; 2008; 102(1-3):101-5. PubMed ID: 18440210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Slip technique, process dissociation model and multinomial modeling: new tools for experimental detection of "Freudian slips"].
    Bröder A; Bredenkamp J
    Z Exp Psychol; 1996; 43(2):175-202. PubMed ID: 9005024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Phonetic coding and reading in college students with and without learning disabilities.
    Apthorp HS
    J Learn Disabil; 1995; 28(6):342-52. PubMed ID: 7622966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Language function in senile dementia.
    Bayles KA
    Brain Lang; 1982 Jul; 16(2):265-80. PubMed ID: 7116128
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of speaking rate on the identification of word boundaries.
    Schwab S; Miller JL; Grosjean F; Mondini M
    Phonetica; 2008; 65(3):173-86. PubMed ID: 18679044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Preliminary experiments on the correlation of speech errors and working memory].
    Bredenkamp J; Dilger S
    Z Exp Psychol; 1998; 45(1):72-9. PubMed ID: 9659007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Morphological errors in casual conversation.
    Bond ZS
    Brain Lang; 1999 Jun 1-15; 68(1-2):144-50. PubMed ID: 10433751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A neural network model for the simulation of word production errors of Finnish nouns.
    Järvelin A; Juhola M; Laine M
    Int J Neural Syst; 2006 Aug; 16(4):241-54. PubMed ID: 16972313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Inner speech slips exhibit lexical bias, but not the phonemic similarity effect.
    Oppenheim GM; Dell GS
    Cognition; 2008 Jan; 106(1):528-37. PubMed ID: 17407776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. If you say thee uh you are describing something hard: the on-line attribution of disfluency during reference comprehension.
    Arnold JE; Kam CL; Tanenhaus MK
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Sep; 33(5):914-30. PubMed ID: 17723069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Linguistic recycling in typical and atypical interaction.
    Perkins MR
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2014; 28(7-8):590-601. PubMed ID: 25000380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Slips of the tongue.
    Fromkin VA
    Sci Am; 1973 Dec; 229(6):110-7. PubMed ID: 4756435
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.