These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20669776)

  • 1. Case study. Conflicting beliefs.
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2010; 40(4):14. PubMed ID: 20669776
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Case study. Conflicting beliefs. Commentary.
    Mukherjee D
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2010; 40(4):15. PubMed ID: 20672461
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Case study. Conflicting beliefs. Commentary.
    Gupta VB
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2010; 40(4):14-5. PubMed ID: 20672460
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Surrogate decision making.
    Lipman HI
    Am J Geriatr Cardiol; 2008; 17(2):120-2. PubMed ID: 18326947
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Religious belief and surrogate medical decision making.
    Eskew S; Meyers C
    J Clin Ethics; 2009; 20(2):192-200. PubMed ID: 19554828
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The power proxy.
    Srivastava R
    N Engl J Med; 2010 Nov; 363(19):1786-9. PubMed ID: 21047221
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Stopping treatment on grounds of futility: a role for institutional policy.
    Stell LK
    St Louis Univ Public Law Rev; 1992; 11(2):481-97. PubMed ID: 11652704
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Berger on burdens.
    Nelson JL
    J Clin Ethics; 2009; 20(2):162-4. PubMed ID: 19554822
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Patients' concerns for family burden: a nonconforming preference in standards for surrogate decision making.
    Berger JT
    J Clin Ethics; 2009; 20(2):158-61. PubMed ID: 19554821
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Commentary on "Patients' concerns for family burden".
    Levine C
    J Clin Ethics; 2009; 20(2):165-7. PubMed ID: 19554823
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. End-of-life decision making in the ICU.
    Siegel MD
    Clin Chest Med; 2009 Mar; 30(1):181-94, x. PubMed ID: 19186289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Jewish law and end-of-life decision making: a case report.
    Blinderman CD
    J Clin Ethics; 2007; 18(4):384-90. PubMed ID: 18321000
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Commentary on Berger's "Patients' concerns for family burden".
    DeRenzo EG
    J Clin Ethics; 2009; 20(2):168-71. PubMed ID: 19554824
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. "Do everything!" Encountering "futility" in medical practice.
    Nelson SN
    Ethics Med; 2003; 19(2):103-13. PubMed ID: 15025117
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Futility, conscientious refusal, and who gets to decide.
    Davis JK
    J Med Philos; 2008 Aug; 33(4):356-73. PubMed ID: 18662950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pediatricians' most difficult decision.
    Howe EG
    J Clin Ethics; 2000; 11(2):99-111. PubMed ID: 11056864
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assigning an appropriate surrogate.
    Baumrucker SJ
    Am J Hosp Palliat Care; 2007; 24(5):422-8. PubMed ID: 17998409
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. When I lay my burden down: commentary on Berger.
    Derse AR
    J Clin Ethics; 2009; 20(2):172-4. PubMed ID: 19554825
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Standards for family decisions: replacing best interests with harm prevention.
    Dresser R
    Am J Bioeth; 2003; 3(2):54-5. PubMed ID: 12859819
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The due process "right to life" in Cruzan and its impact on "right-to-die" law.
    Bopp J; Avila D
    Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1991; 53(1):193-233. PubMed ID: 11652639
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.