BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20670419)

  • 1. Confirmation of a low HER2 positivity rate of breast carcinomas - limitations of immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization.
    Vogel UF
    Diagn Pathol; 2010 Jul; 5():50. PubMed ID: 20670419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessment of ERBB2/HER2 Status in HER2-Equivocal Breast Cancers by FISH and 2013/2014 ASCO-CAP Guidelines.
    Press MF; Seoane JA; Curtis C; Quinaux E; Guzman R; Sauter G; Eiermann W; Mackey JR; Robert N; Pienkowski T; Crown J; Martin M; Valero V; Bee V; Ma Y; Villalobos I; Slamon DJ
    JAMA Oncol; 2019 Mar; 5(3):366-375. PubMed ID: 30520947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The updated 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline on human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 interpretation in breast cancer: comparison with previous guidelines and clinical significance of the proposed in situ hybridization groups.
    Woo JW; Lee K; Chung YR; Jang MH; Ahn S; Park SY
    Hum Pathol; 2020 Apr; 98():10-21. PubMed ID: 32027910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Well-differentiated invasive breast cancers with equivocal HER2 immunohistochemistry: what is the yield of routine reflex in-situ hybridization testing?
    Bethune GC; Pettit AS; Veldhuijzen van Zanten D; Barnes PJ
    Histopathology; 2017 May; 70(6):966-974. PubMed ID: 28032917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Concordance of HER2 Immunohistochemistry and Fluorescence
    Furrer D; Jacob S; Caron C; Sanschagrin F; Provencher L; Diorio C
    Anticancer Res; 2017 Jun; 37(6):3323-3329. PubMed ID: 28551685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. HER2 testing in breast carcinoma: very low concordance rate between reference and local laboratories in Brazil.
    Wludarski SC; Lopes LF; Berto E Silva TR; Carvalho FM; Weiss LM; Bacchi CE
    Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol; 2011 Mar; 19(2):112-8. PubMed ID: 20930616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. HER2 Testing for Breast Cancer in the Genomics Laboratory: A Sea Change for Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization.
    Geiersbach KB; Sill DR; Meyer RG; Yuhas JA; Sukov WR; Mounajjed T; Carter JM; Jenkins RB; Chen B
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2021 Jul; 145(7):883-886. PubMed ID: 33112955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Changing frequency of equivocal HER-2/neu scores and factors predictive of negative HER 2/neu fluorescent in situ hybridisation in invasive carcinomas of the breast.
    Boulos F; Farra CG; Saad Aldin EM; Masaad C; Hassoun Y; Fedda F; Doumiati H; Tawil AN; Nasser Z; Nahleh Z; Tfayli A
    J Clin Pathol; 2014 Mar; 67(3):204-9. PubMed ID: 24108431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of HER2 using the 2018 ASCO/CAP guideline update for invasive breast cancer: a critical look at cases classified as HER2 2+ by immunohistochemistry.
    Taylor VJ; Barnes PJ; Godwin SC; Bethune GC
    Virchows Arch; 2021 Jul; 479(1):23-31. PubMed ID: 33527151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impact of the updated 2018 ASCO/CAP guidelines on HER2 FISH testing in invasive breast cancer: a retrospective study of HER2 fish results of 2233 cases.
    Liu ZH; Wang K; Lin DY; Xu J; Chen J; Long XY; Ge Y; Luo XL; Zhang KP; Liu YH; Xu FP
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2019 May; 175(1):51-57. PubMed ID: 30712197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Predictability of adjuvant trastuzumab benefit in N9831 patients using the ASCO/CAP HER2-positivity criteria.
    Perez EA; Dueck AC; McCullough AE; Reinholz MM; Tenner KS; Davidson NE; Gralow J; Harris LN; Kutteh LA; Hillman DW; Jenkins RB; Chen B
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2012 Jan; 104(2):159-62. PubMed ID: 22138096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An immunohistochemical and fluorescence in situ hybridization-based comparison between the Oracle HER2 Bond Immunohistochemical System, Dako HercepTest, and Vysis PathVysion HER2 FISH using both commercially validated and modified ASCO/CAP and United Kingdom HER2 IHC scoring guidelines.
    O'Grady A; Allen D; Happerfield L; Johnson N; Provenzano E; Pinder SE; Tee L; Gu M; Kay EW
    Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol; 2010 Dec; 18(6):489-93. PubMed ID: 20661132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Laboratory testing for HER2/neu in breast carcinoma: an evolving strategy to predict response to targeted therapy.
    Diaz NM
    Cancer Control; 2001; 8(5):415-8. PubMed ID: 11579337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. HER2 Equivocal (Score = 2+) Breast Carcinoma Cases Identified by Immunohistochemistry at a South African Hospital. What is the Impact of Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization Testing?
    Mohanlal RD; Bouwer N; Willem P
    Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol; 2023 Sep; 31(8):555-560. PubMed ID: 37471623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. HER2 Immunohistochemistry in Invasive Micropapillary Breast Carcinoma: Complete Assessment of an Incomplete Pattern.
    Perron M; Wen HY; Hanna MG; Brogi E; Ross DS
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2021 Aug; 145(8):979-987. PubMed ID: 33212478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Correlation between HER2 determined by fluorescence in situ hybridization and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction of the oncotype DX test.
    Dvorak L; Dolan M; Fink J; Varghese L; Henriksen J; Gulbahce HE
    Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol; 2013 May; 21(3):196-9. PubMed ID: 22914611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. HER2 immunohistochemical and fluorescence in situ hybridization discordances in invasive breast carcinoma with micropapillary features.
    Stewart RL; Caron JE; Gulbahce EH; Factor RE; Geiersbach KB; Downs-Kelly E
    Mod Pathol; 2017 Nov; 30(11):1561-1566. PubMed ID: 28752841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Breast carcinomas with low amplified/equivocal HER2 by Ish: potential supporting role of multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification.
    Ercolani C; MarchiĆ² C; Di Benedetto A; Fabi A; Perracchio L; Vici P; Sperati F; Buglioni S; Arena V; Pescarmona E; Sapino A; Terrenato I; Mottolese M
    J Exp Clin Cancer Res; 2017 Oct; 36(1):143. PubMed ID: 29029640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Implications of the Updated 2013 American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists Guideline Recommendations on Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Gene Testing Using Immunohistochemistry and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization for Breast Cancer.
    Lim TH; Lim AS; Thike AA; Tien SL; Tan PH
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2016 Feb; 140(2):140-7. PubMed ID: 26910218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact of the 2018 ASCO/CAP guidelines on HER2 fluorescence in situ hybridization interpretation in invasive breast cancers with immunohistochemically equivocal results.
    Wang B; Ding W; Sun K; Wang X; Xu L; Teng X
    Sci Rep; 2019 Nov; 9(1):16726. PubMed ID: 31723206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.