These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20670576)

  • 21. Is Combined Anteversion Equally Affected by Acetabular Cup and Femoral Stem Anteversion?
    Pour AE; Schwarzkopf R; Patel KP; Anjaria M; Lazennec JY; Dorr LD
    J Arthroplasty; 2021 Jul; 36(7):2393-2401. PubMed ID: 33653630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The impact of the CCD-angle on range of motion and cup positioning in total hip arthroplasty.
    Widmer KH; Majewski M
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2005 Aug; 20(7):723-8. PubMed ID: 15964112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Femur first in hip arthroplasty--the concept of combined anteversion].
    Sendtner E; Müller M; Winkler R; Wörner M; Grifka J; Renkawitz T
    Z Orthop Unfall; 2010 Mar; 148(2):185-90. PubMed ID: 20376760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [USE OF SMARTPHONE IN ACETABULAR COMPONENT ANGLE MEASUREMENT DURING TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY].
    Wang J; Xu R; Kang X; Zhang H
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Sep; 30(9):1061-1064. PubMed ID: 29786355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Low femoral antetorsion and total hip arthroplasty: a risk factor.
    Shoji T; Yasunaga Y; Yamasaki T; Izumi S; Hachisuka S; Ochi M
    Int Orthop; 2015 Jan; 39(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 25086820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A forty millimetre head significantly improves range of motion compared with a twenty eight millimetre head in total hip arthroplasty using a computed tomography-based navigation system.
    Tsuda K; Haraguchi K; Koyanagi J; Takahashi S; Sugama R; Fujiwara K
    Int Orthop; 2016 Oct; 40(10):2031-2039. PubMed ID: 26780716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The Effect of Pelvic Tilt and Femoral Head Size on Hip Range-of-Motion to Impingement.
    McCarthy TF; Nevelos J; Elmallah RK; Chughtai M; Khlopas A; Alipit V; Wagner TC; Mont MA
    J Arthroplasty; 2017 Nov; 32(11):3544-3549. PubMed ID: 28712801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Increase in safe zone area of the acetabular cup using dual mobility cups in THA.
    Ohmori T; Kabata T; Maeda T; Kajino Y; Taga T; Hasegawa K; Inoue D; Yamamoto T; Takagi T; Tsuchiya H
    Hip Int; 2017 Jul; 27(4):361-367. PubMed ID: 28165597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Gender differences in 3D morphology and bony impingement of human hips.
    Nakahara I; Takao M; Sakai T; Nishii T; Yoshikawa H; Sugano N
    J Orthop Res; 2011 Mar; 29(3):333-9. PubMed ID: 20939047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Ceramic cups for hip endoprostheses. 6: Cup design, inclination and antetorsion angle modify range of motion and impingement].
    Bader R; Willmann G
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 1999; 44(7-8):212-9. PubMed ID: 10472729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Influence of femoral bowing on range of motion after total hip arthroplasty.
    Akiyama K; Shibuya T
    Int Orthop; 2018 Aug; 42(8):1795-1802. PubMed ID: 29275431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Low femoral antetorsion as a risk factor for bony impingement after bipolar hemiarthroplasty.
    Shoji T; Yasunaga Y; Yamasaki T; Izumi S; Hachisuka S; Ochi M
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2015 Jul; 10():105. PubMed ID: 26149008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Limited range of motion of hip resurfacing arthroplasty due to unfavorable ratio of prosthetic head size and femoral neck diameter.
    Kluess D; Zietz C; Lindner T; Mittelmeier W; Schmitz KP; Bader R
    Acta Orthop; 2008 Dec; 79(6):748-54. PubMed ID: 19085490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Impingement between the acetabular cup and the femoral neck after hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
    Yoo MC; Cho YJ; Chun YS; Rhyu KH
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 May; 93 Suppl 2():99-106. PubMed ID: 21543698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Danish survey of acetabular component positioning practice during primary total hip arthroplasty.
    Cotong D; Troelsen A; Husted H; Gromov K
    Dan Med J; 2017 Apr; 64(4):. PubMed ID: 28385170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Computer-based motion simulation of total hip prostheses with ceramic-on-ceramic wear couple. Analysis of implant design andorientation as influence parameters].
    Bader R; Steinhauser E; Gradinger R; Willmann G; Mittelmeier W
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2002; 140(3):310-6. PubMed ID: 12085297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Becker V-shaped lateral rotation osteotomy in total hip arthroplasty for Crowe type IV development dislocation of hip].
    Li Y; Ma W; Sun J; Song X; An M; Zhang Q
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Sep; 27(9):1032-6. PubMed ID: 24279008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effect of acetabular component anteversion on dislocation mechanisms in total hip arthroplasty.
    Higa M; Tanino H; Abo M; Kakunai S; Banks SA
    J Biomech; 2011 Jun; 44(9):1810-3. PubMed ID: 21529811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Early primary total hip arthroplasty for acetabular fractures in elderly patients].
    Simko P; Braunsteiner T; Vajcziková S
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2006 Aug; 73(4):275-82. PubMed ID: 17026887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Hip resurfacing requires larger acetabular cups than conventional hip replacement: a comparative analysis of 100 hips, based on radiographic templating.
    Schmidutz F; Fottner A; Wanke-Jellinek L; Steinbrück A; Jansson V; Mazzochian F
    Acta Orthop Belg; 2012 Aug; 78(4):484-91. PubMed ID: 23019781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.