These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

304 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20671302)

  • 1. A comparative analysis of three online appraisal instruments' ability to assess validity in qualitative research.
    Hannes K; Lockwood C; Pearson A
    Qual Health Res; 2010 Dec; 20(12):1736-43. PubMed ID: 20671302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A scoring system for appraising mixed methods research, and concomitantly appraising qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods primary studies in Mixed Studies Reviews.
    Pluye P; Gagnon MP; Griffiths F; Johnson-Lafleur J
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2009 Apr; 46(4):529-46. PubMed ID: 19233357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An appraisal of the quality of published qualitative dental research.
    Masood M; Thaliath ET; Bower EJ; Newton JT
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2011 Jun; 39(3):193-203. PubMed ID: 21070318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A practical educational tool for teaching child-care hospital professionals attending evidence-based practice courses for continuing medical education to appraise internal validity in systematic reviews.
    Rosati P; Porzsolt F
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2013 Aug; 19(4):648-52. PubMed ID: 22845043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pragmatism as the philosophical foundation for the Joanna Briggs meta-aggregative approach to qualitative evidence synthesis.
    Hannes K; Lockwood C
    J Adv Nurs; 2011 Jul; 67(7):1632-42. PubMed ID: 21466579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Validation of a new assessment tool for qualitative research articles.
    Schou L; Høstrup H; Lyngsø EE; Larsen S; Poulsen I
    J Adv Nurs; 2012 Sep; 68(9):2086-94. PubMed ID: 22168459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Concept analysis in nursing research: a critical appraisal.
    Morse JM; Hupcey JE; Mitcham C; Lenz ER
    Sch Inq Nurs Pract; 1996; 10(3):253-77. PubMed ID: 9009821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The development of a quality appraisal tool for studies of diagnostic reliability (QAREL).
    Lucas NP; Macaskill P; Irwig L; Bogduk N
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Aug; 63(8):854-61. PubMed ID: 20056381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The use of meta-synthesis in cardiovascular nursing research.
    Woodend AK
    Can J Cardiovasc Nurs; 2007; 17(3):32-6. PubMed ID: 17941567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Meta-synthesis method for qualitative research: a literature review.
    Walsh D; Downe S
    J Adv Nurs; 2005 Apr; 50(2):204-11. PubMed ID: 15788085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Quality appraisal of systematic reviews and meta-analysis of pneumonia in China].
    Hou ZK; Li JS; Yu XQ; Li B; Zhou HY; Zhang YX
    Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue; 2009 Apr; 21(4):207-10. PubMed ID: 19374786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Beyond PICO: the SPIDER tool for qualitative evidence synthesis.
    Cooke A; Smith D; Booth A
    Qual Health Res; 2012 Oct; 22(10):1435-43. PubMed ID: 22829486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Should we exclude inadequately reported studies from qualitative systematic reviews? An evaluation of sensitivity analyses in two case study reviews.
    Carroll C; Booth A; Lloyd-Jones M
    Qual Health Res; 2012 Oct; 22(10):1425-34. PubMed ID: 22865107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The quality of reports of critical care meta-analyses in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: an independent appraisal.
    Delaney A; Bagshaw SM; Ferland A; Laupland K; Manns B; Doig C
    Crit Care Med; 2007 Feb; 35(2):589-94. PubMed ID: 17205029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Generalizability and transferability of meta-synthesis research findings.
    Finfgeld-Connett D
    J Adv Nurs; 2010 Feb; 66(2):246-54. PubMed ID: 20423407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Interrater reliability in assessing quality of diagnostic accuracy studies using the QUADAS tool. A preliminary assessment.
    Hollingworth W; Medina LS; Lenkinski RE; Shibata DK; Bernal B; Zurakowski D; Comstock B; Jarvik JG
    Acad Radiol; 2006 Jul; 13(7):803-10. PubMed ID: 16777553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A hierarchy of evidence for assessing qualitative health research.
    Daly J; Willis K; Small R; Green J; Welch N; Kealy M; Hughes E
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2007 Jan; 60(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 17161753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reading and interpreting economic evaluations in rheumatoid arthritis: an assessment of selected instruments for critical appraisal.
    Weisman MH; Gano AD; Gabriel SE; Hochberg MC; Kavanaugh A; Ofman JJ; Prashker M; Suarez-Almazor ME; Yelin E; Nakelsky SD; Croft JD;
    J Rheumatol; 2003 Aug; 30(8):1739-47. PubMed ID: 12913929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reviewing studies with diverse designs: the development and evaluation of a new tool.
    Sirriyeh R; Lawton R; Gardner P; Armitage G
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2012 Aug; 18(4):746-52. PubMed ID: 21410846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.