These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20671680)

  • 1. Retraction recommended for enzyme-chip paper.
    Abbott A
    Nature; 2010 Jul; 466(7306):540-1. PubMed ID: 20671680
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Scientific credit and credibility.
    Grant PM
    Nat Mater; 2002 Nov; 1(3):139-41. PubMed ID: 12618792
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Facing up to fraud.
    Nat Mater; 2002 Nov; 1(3):137. PubMed ID: 12618791
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Retractions' realities.
    Nature; 2003 Mar; 422(6927):1. PubMed ID: 12621394
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Enzyme microarrays: On-chip determination of inhibition constants based on affinity-label detection of enzymatic activity.
    Eppinger J; Funeriu DP; Miyake M; Denizot L; Miyake J
    Angew Chem Int Ed Engl; 2004 Jul; 43(29):3806-10. PubMed ID: 15258942
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Modellers seek reason for low retraction rates.
    Butler D; Hogan J
    Nature; 2007 May; 447(7142):236-7. PubMed ID: 17507938
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Korean scandal will have global fallout.
    Check E; Cyranoski D
    Nature; 2005 Dec; 438(7071):1056-7. PubMed ID: 16371963
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Conflicts around a study of Mexican crops.
    Suarez AV; Bernard M; Tsutsui ND; Blackledge TA; Copren K; Sarnat EM; Wild AL; Getz WM; Starks PT; Will K; Palsbøll PJ; Hauber ME; Moritz C; Richman AD
    Nature; 2002 Jun; 417(6892):897; author reply 897-8. PubMed ID: 12087376
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Conflicts around a study of Mexican crops.
    Worthy K; Strohman RC; Billings PR
    Nature; 2002 Jun; 417(6892):897; author reply 897-8. PubMed ID: 12087377
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals: writing and editing for biomedical publication.
    International Committee of Medical Journal Editors
    Croat Med J; 2003 Dec; 44(6):770-83. PubMed ID: 14725274
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Additional statements from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.
    CMAJ; 1995 May; 152(10):1647-55. PubMed ID: 7743450
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Entire-paper plagiarism caught by software.
    Butler D
    Nature; 2008 Oct; 455(7214):715. PubMed ID: 18843325
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. China cracks down on fake peer reviews.
    Cyranoski D
    Nature; 2017 Jun; 546(7659):464. PubMed ID: 28640278
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry publication standards of ethical conduct.
    Lefebvre CA; Lang BR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Apr; 93(4):311-4. PubMed ID: 15798678
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Scientific misconduct. Bell Labs fires star physicist found guilty of forging data.
    Service RF
    Science; 2002 Oct; 298(5591):30-1. PubMed ID: 12364753
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Negative results.
    Nature; 2008 May; 453(7193):258. PubMed ID: 18480760
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A simple system of checks and balances to cut fraud.
    Yang X; Eggan K; Seidel G; Jaenisch R; Melton D
    Nature; 2006 Feb; 439(7078):782. PubMed ID: 16482128
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Debate on peer review. Report from an international congress on peer review].
    Grimby G
    Lakartidningen; 2002 Jul; 99(30-31):3109-10. PubMed ID: 12198929
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Empirical developments in retraction.
    Redman BK; Yarandi HN; Merz JF
    J Med Ethics; 2008 Nov; 34(11):807-9. PubMed ID: 18974415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Lancet withdraws research paper and warns authors about rules of "gift authorship".
    Dyer C
    BMJ; 2008 Sep; 337():a1711. PubMed ID: 18799532
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.