These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

435 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20672723)

  • 41. Clinical evaluation of the posterior composite Quixfil in class I and II cavities: 4-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial.
    Manhart J; Chen HY; Hickel R
    J Adhes Dent; 2010 Jun; 12(3):237-43. PubMed ID: 20157663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Evaluation of the mechanical and physical properties of a posterior resin composite in posterior adult teeth.
    Agbaje LO; Shaba OP; Adegbulugbe IC
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2010 Dec; 13(4):431-5. PubMed ID: 21220860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. A prospective randomised clinical trial of one bis-GMA-based and two ormocer-based composite restorative systems in class II cavities: three-year results.
    Bottenberg P; Alaerts M; Keulemans F
    J Dent; 2007 Feb; 35(2):163-71. PubMed ID: 16963171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. A clinical evaluation of a giomer restorative system containing surface prereacted glass ionomer filler: results from a 13-year recall examination.
    Gordan VV; Blaser PK; Watson RE; Mjör IA; McEdward DL; Sensi LG; Riley JL
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2014 Oct; 145(10):1036-43. PubMed ID: 25270702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. A 7-year randomized prospective study of a one-step self-etching adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions. The effect of curing modes and restorative material.
    van Dijken JW; Pallesen U
    J Dent; 2012 Dec; 40(12):1060-7. PubMed ID: 22955004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Nanohybrid vs. fine hybrid composite in Class II cavities: clinical results and margin analysis after four years.
    Krämer N; Reinelt C; Richter G; Petschelt A; Frankenberger R
    Dent Mater; 2009 Jun; 25(6):750-9. PubMed ID: 19237189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. 5-year clinical performance of resin composite versus resin modified glass ionomer restorative system in non-carious cervical lesions.
    Franco EB; Benetti AR; Ishikiriama SK; Santiago SL; Lauris JR; Jorge MF; Navarro MF
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(4):403-8. PubMed ID: 16924979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Comparative clinical evaluation of different treatment approaches using a microfilled resin composite and a compomer in Class III cavities: two-year results.
    Demirci M; Yildiz E; Uysal O
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 18335727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Class II composite restorations with metallic and translucent matrices: 2-year follow-up findings.
    J Dent; ; . PubMed ID: 17034926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.