These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20672728)

  • 41. Resin composites: Modulus of elasticity and marginal quality.
    Benetti AR; Peutzfeldt A; Lussi A; Flury S
    J Dent; 2014 Sep; 42(9):1185-92. PubMed ID: 25019363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Effect of radiotherapy on the radiopacity and flexural strength of a composite resin.
    Catelan A; Padilha AC; Salzedas LM; Coclete GA; dos Santos PH
    Acta Odontol Latinoam; 2008; 21(2):159-62. PubMed ID: 19177853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Longitudinal Evaluation of Radiopacity of Resin Composites: Influence of Photoactivation and Accelerated Photoaging.
    Cruz AD; Costa I; Calazans FS; Aguiar MF; Barceleiro MO
    Oper Dent; 2018; 43(2):E64-E71. PubMed ID: 29394139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The effect of flowable resin composite on microleakage in class V cavities.
    Yazici AR; Baseren M; Dayangaç B
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 12540117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Effect of flowable composite liner and glass ionomer liner on class II gingival marginal adaptation of direct composite restorations with different bonding strategies.
    Aggarwal V; Singla M; Yadav S; Yadav H
    J Dent; 2014 May; 42(5):619-25. PubMed ID: 24631232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Flowable materials as an intermediate layer could improve the marginal and internal adaptation of composite restorations in Class-V-cavities.
    Li Q; Jepsen S; Albers HK; Eberhard J
    Dent Mater; 2006 Mar; 22(3):250-7. PubMed ID: 16084584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Radiopacity of portland cement associated with different radiopacifying agents.
    Húngaro Duarte MA; de Oliveira El Kadre GD; Vivan RR; Guerreiro Tanomaru JM; Tanomaru Filho M; de Moraes IG
    J Endod; 2009 May; 35(5):737-40. PubMed ID: 19410095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Are the flowable composites suitable for orthodontic bracket bonding?
    Uysal T; Sari Z; Demir A
    Angle Orthod; 2004 Oct; 74(5):697-702. PubMed ID: 15529507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The influence of elastic modulus of base material on the marginal adaptation of direct composite restoration.
    Kwon OH; Kim DH; Park SH
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(4):441-7. PubMed ID: 20672729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Radiopacity of Posterior Restorative Materials: A Comparative In Vitro Study.
    Balci M; Turkun LS; Boyacıoglu H; Guneri P; Ergucu Z
    Oper Dent; 2023 May; 48(3):337-346. PubMed ID: 37079911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The influence of fiber reinforcement of composites on shear bond strengths to enamel.
    Meiers JC; Kazemi RB; Donadio M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Apr; 89(4):388-93. PubMed ID: 12690352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The effect of flowable resin composites as gingival increments on the microleakage of posterior resin composites.
    Attar N; Turgut MD; Güngör HC
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(2):162-7. PubMed ID: 15088727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Evaluation of flowable resin composite surfaces eroded by acidic and alcoholic drinks.
    Han L; Okamoto A; Fukushima M; Okiji T
    Dent Mater J; 2008 May; 27(3):455-65. PubMed ID: 18717176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Bond strength performance of different resin composites used as core materials around fiber posts.
    Sadek FT; Monticelli F; Goracci C; Tay FR; Cardoso PE; Ferrari M
    Dent Mater; 2007 Jan; 23(1):95-9. PubMed ID: 16434092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Influence of flowable liner and margin location on microleakage of conventional and packable class II resin composites.
    Tredwin CJ; Stokes A; Moles DR
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 15765955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Surface roughness of nanofill and nanohybrid resin composites after polishing and brushing.
    Senawongse P; Pongprueksa P
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2007; 19(5):265-73; discussion 274-5. PubMed ID: 17877626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. [Thermal and structural properties of nano- and micro-filled composites].
    Nica I; Rusu V; Cimpoeşu N; Vizureanu P; Aluculesei A
    Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi; 2009; 113(3):892-8. PubMed ID: 20191851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Effect of thickness of flowable resins on marginal leakage in class II composite restorations.
    Malmström HS; Schlueter M; Roach T; Moss ME
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(4):373-80. PubMed ID: 12120775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Flowability of composites is no guarantee for contraction stress reduction.
    Cadenaro M; Marchesi G; Antoniolli F; Davidson C; De Stefano Dorigo E; Breschi L
    Dent Mater; 2009 May; 25(5):649-54. PubMed ID: 19136149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Radiopacity of dual-cured and chemical-cured resin-based cements.
    Rubo MH; el-Mowafy O
    Int J Prosthodont; 1998; 11(1):70-4. PubMed ID: 9588993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.