316 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20672733)
1. Performance of different polishing techniques for direct CAD/CAM ceramic restorations.
Flury S; Lussi A; Zimmerli B
Oper Dent; 2010; 35(4):470-81. PubMed ID: 20672733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of Two Polishing Systems on Surface Roughness, Topography, and Flexural Strength of a Monolithic Lithium Disilicate Ceramic.
Mohammadibassir M; Rezvani MB; Golzari H; Moravej Salehi E; Fahimi MA; Kharazi Fard MJ
J Prosthodont; 2019 Jan; 28(1):e172-e180. PubMed ID: 28273681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Postadjustment polishing of CAD-CAM ceramic with luminescence diamond gel.
Finger WJ; Noack MD
Am J Dent; 2000 Feb; 13(1):8-12. PubMed ID: 11763906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effects of porcelain polishing systems on the color and surface texture of feldspathic porcelain.
Sarac D; Sarac YS; Yuzbasioglu E; Bal S
J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Aug; 96(2):122-8. PubMed ID: 16911889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Finishing and polishing of a hybrid composite and a heat-pressed glass ceramic.
Jung M
Oper Dent; 2002; 27(2):175-83. PubMed ID: 11931137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of artificial toothbrushing and water storage on the surface roughness and micromechanical properties of tooth-colored CAD-CAM materials.
Flury S; Diebold E; Peutzfeldt A; Lussi A
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jun; 117(6):767-774. PubMed ID: 27836147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Surface roughness of five different dental ceramic core materials after grinding and polishing.
Kou W; Molin M; Sjögren G
J Oral Rehabil; 2006 Feb; 33(2):117-24. PubMed ID: 16457671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of surface roughness on mechanical properties of two computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) ceramic materials.
Flury S; Peutzfeldt A; Lussi A
Oper Dent; 2012; 37(6):617-24. PubMed ID: 22616923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Three-body wear potential of dental yttrium-stabilized zirconia ceramic after grinding, polishing, and glazing treatments.
Amer R; Kürklü D; Kateeb E; Seghi RR
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1151-5. PubMed ID: 24836531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Correlation of surface texture with the stainability of ceramics.
Kursoglu P; Karagoz Motro PF; Kazazoglu E
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):306-13. PubMed ID: 24484857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Translucency of esthetic dental restorative CAD/CAM materials and composite resins with respect to thickness and surface roughness.
Awad D; Stawarczyk B; Liebermann A; Ilie N
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jun; 113(6):534-40. PubMed ID: 25749093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of different surface treatments on stainability of ceramics.
Motro PF; Kursoglu P; Kazazoglu E
J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Oct; 108(4):231-7. PubMed ID: 23031729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of core material, veneering porcelain, and fabrication technique on the biaxial flexural strength and weibull analysis of selected dental ceramics.
Lin WS; Ercoli C; Feng C; Morton D
J Prosthodont; 2012 Jul; 21(5):353-62. PubMed ID: 22462639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of Finishing and Polishing on the Surface Roughness and Gloss of Feldspathic Ceramic for Chairside CAD/CAM Systems.
Carrabba M; Vichi A; Vultaggio G; Pallari S; Paravina R; Ferrari M
Oper Dent; 2017; 42(2):175-184. PubMed ID: 27723423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of six surface treatment methods on the surface roughness of a low-fusing and an ultra low-fusing feldspathic ceramic material.
Dalkiz M; Sipahi C; Beydemir B
J Prosthodont; 2009 Apr; 18(3):217-22. PubMed ID: 19141045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Microtensile bond strength of different components of core veneered all-ceramic restorations.
Aboushelib MN; de Jager N; Kleverlaan CJ; Feilzer AJ
Dent Mater; 2005 Oct; 21(10):984-91. PubMed ID: 16085302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Surface roughness in ceramics with different finishing techniques using atomic force microscope and profilometer.
Tholt de Vasconcellos B; Miranda-Júnior WG; Prioli R; Thompson J; Oda M
Oper Dent; 2006; 31(4):442-9. PubMed ID: 16924984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Surface characterization of feldspathic ceramic using ATR FT-IR and ellipsometry after various silanization protocols.
Queiroz JR; Benetti P; Ozcan M; de Oliveira LF; Della Bona A; Takahashi FE; Bottino MA
Dent Mater; 2012 Feb; 28(2):189-96. PubMed ID: 22035984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of glazed and polished surface finishes on the friction coefficient of two low-fusing ceramics.
Schuh C; Kinast EJ; Mezzomo E; Kapczinski MP
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Mar; 93(3):245-52. PubMed ID: 15775925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of Finishing and Polishing on the Surface Roughness of Four Ceramic Materials after Occlusal Adjustment.
Amaya-Pajares SP; Ritter AV; Vera Resendiz C; Henson BR; Culp L; Donovan TE
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2016 Nov; 28(6):382-396. PubMed ID: 27264939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
