BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

288 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20673756)

  • 1. Effects of previous experience and associated knowledge on retrieval processes of faces: an ERP investigation of newly learned faces.
    Herzmann G; Sommer W
    Brain Res; 2010 Oct; 1356():54-72. PubMed ID: 20673756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. N250 ERP correlates of the acquisition of face representations across different images.
    Kaufmann JM; Schweinberger SR; Burton AM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Apr; 21(4):625-41. PubMed ID: 18702593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Learning task affects ERP-correlates of the own-race bias, but not recognition memory performance.
    Stahl J; Wiese H; Schweinberger SR
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jun; 48(7):2027-40. PubMed ID: 20362599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The age of the beholder: ERP evidence of an own-age bias in face memory.
    Wiese H; Schweinberger SR; Hansen K
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Oct; 46(12):2973-85. PubMed ID: 18602408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An event-related brain potential study of explicit face recognition.
    Gosling A; Eimer M
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jul; 49(9):2736-45. PubMed ID: 21679721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Perceptual fluency, semantic familiarity and recognition-related familiarity: an electrophysiological exploration.
    Nessler D; Mecklinger A; Penney TB
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Feb; 22(2):265-88. PubMed ID: 15653299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Deep and shallow encoding effects on face recognition: an ERP study.
    Marzi T; Viggiano MP
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2010 Dec; 78(3):239-50. PubMed ID: 20797414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Exploring the functional architecture of person recognition system with event-related potentials in a within- and cross-domain self-priming of faces.
    Jemel B; Pisani M; Rousselle L; Crommelinck M; Bruyer R
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(14):2024-40. PubMed ID: 16243050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Memory-related ERP components for experimentally learned faces and names: characteristics and parallel-test reliabilities.
    Herzmann G; Sommer W
    Psychophysiology; 2007 Mar; 44(2):262-76. PubMed ID: 17343710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dissociating recollection from familiarity: electrophysiological evidence that familiarity for faces is associated with a posterior old/new effect.
    MacKenzie G; Donaldson DI
    Neuroimage; 2007 Jun; 36(2):454-63. PubMed ID: 17451972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Early electrophysiological correlates of adaptation to personally familiar and unfamiliar faces across viewpoint changes.
    Caharel S; Jacques C; d'Arripe O; Ramon M; Rossion B
    Brain Res; 2011 Apr; 1387():85-98. PubMed ID: 21362409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Characterizing the spatio-temporal dynamics of the neural events occurring prior to and up to overt recognition of famous faces.
    Jemel B; Schuller AM; Goffaux V
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Oct; 22(10):2289-305. PubMed ID: 19642891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. "Did you see him in the newspaper?" Electrophysiological correlates of context and valence in face processing.
    Galli G; Feurra M; Viggiano MP
    Brain Res; 2006 Nov; 1119(1):190-202. PubMed ID: 17005161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. ERP profiles for face and word recognition are based on their status in semantic memory not their stimulus category.
    Nie A; Griffin M; Keinath A; Walsh M; Dittmann A; Reder L
    Brain Res; 2014 Apr; 1557():66-73. PubMed ID: 24530268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Semantic learning modifies perceptual face processing.
    Heisz JJ; Shedden JM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Jun; 21(6):1127-34. PubMed ID: 18752406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Face perception in the mind's eye.
    Righart R; Burra N; Vuilleumier P
    Brain Topogr; 2011 Mar; 24(1):9-18. PubMed ID: 21052814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The time course of repetition effects for familiar faces and objects: an ERP study.
    Guillaume C; Guillery-Girard B; Chaby L; Lebreton K; Hugueville L; Eustache F; Fiori N
    Brain Res; 2009 Jan; 1248():149-61. PubMed ID: 19028466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Electrophysiological markers of covert face recognition in developmental prosopagnosia.
    Eimer M; Gosling A; Duchaine B
    Brain; 2012 Feb; 135(Pt 2):542-54. PubMed ID: 22271660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Distortions in the brain? ERP effects of caricaturing familiar and unfamiliar faces.
    Kaufmann JM; Schweinberger SR
    Brain Res; 2008 Sep; 1228():177-88. PubMed ID: 18634766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of anticaricaturing vs. caricaturing and their neural correlates elucidate a role of shape for face learning.
    Schulz C; Kaufmann JM; Walther L; Schweinberger SR
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 Aug; 50(10):2426-34. PubMed ID: 22750120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.