These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

608 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20673947)

  • 21. Persistence of fecal indicator bacteria in Santa Monica Bay beach sediments.
    Lee CM; Lin TY; Lin CC; Kohbodi GA; Bhatt A; Lee R; Jay JA
    Water Res; 2006 Aug; 40(14):2593-602. PubMed ID: 16793111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Use of salinity mixing models to estimate the contribution of creek water fecal indicator bacteria to an estuarine environment: Newport Bay, California.
    McLaughlin K; Ahn JH; Litton RM; Grant SB
    Water Res; 2007 Aug; 41(16):3595-604. PubMed ID: 17597176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparisons of statistical models to predict fecal indicator bacteria concentrations enumerated by qPCR- and culture-based methods.
    Gonzalez RA; Noble RT
    Water Res; 2014 Jan; 48():296-305. PubMed ID: 24139103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparing wastewater chemicals, indicator bacteria concentrations, and bacterial pathogen genes as fecal pollution indicators.
    Haack SK; Duris JW; Fogarty LR; Kolpin DW; Focazio MJ; Furlong ET; Meyer MT
    J Environ Qual; 2009; 38(1):248-58. PubMed ID: 19141815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Source-pathway separation of multiple contaminants during a rainfall-runoff event in an artificially drained agricultural watershed.
    Tomer MD; Wilson CG; Moorman TB; Cole KJ; Heer D; Isenhart TM
    J Environ Qual; 2010; 39(3):882-95. PubMed ID: 20400584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Scaling and management of fecal indicator bacteria in runoff from a coastal urban watershed in southern California.
    Reeves RL; Grant SB; Mrse RD; Copil Oancea CM; Sanders BF; Boehm AB
    Environ Sci Technol; 2004 May; 38(9):2637-48. PubMed ID: 15180060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Turbidity dynamics during spring storm events in an urban headwater river system: the Upper Tame, West Midlands, UK.
    Lawler DM; Petts GE; Foster ID; Harper S
    Sci Total Environ; 2006 May; 360(1-3):109-26. PubMed ID: 16460785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Variability of fecal indicator bacteria in flowing and ponded waters in southern California: implications for bacterial TMDL development and implementation.
    He LM; Lu J; Shi W
    Water Res; 2007 Jul; 41(14):3132-40. PubMed ID: 17543369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Monitoring coastal marine waters for spore-forming bacteria of faecal and soil origin to determine point from non-point source pollution.
    Fujioka RS
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 44(7):181-8. PubMed ID: 11724486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Tidal and longitudinal variation of faecal indicator bacteria in an estuarine creek in south-east Queensland, Australia.
    Mill A; Schlacher T; Katouli M
    Mar Pollut Bull; 2006 Aug; 52(8):881-91. PubMed ID: 16406429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Spatial variation of waterborne Escherichia coli - implications for routine water quality monitoring.
    Quilliam RS; Clements K; Duce C; Cottrill SB; Malham SK; Jones DL
    J Water Health; 2011 Dec; 9(4):734-7. PubMed ID: 22048432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Roadside ditches as conduits of fecal indicator organisms and sediment: implications for water quality management.
    Falbo K; Schneider RL; Buckley DH; Walter MT; Bergholz PW; Buchanan BP
    J Environ Manage; 2013 Oct; 128():1050-9. PubMed ID: 23933218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Semi-quantitative evaluation of fecal contamination potential by human and ruminant sources using multiple lines of evidence.
    Stoeckel DM; Stelzer EA; Stogner RW; Mau DP
    Water Res; 2011 May; 45(10):3225-44. PubMed ID: 21513966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Long-term characterization of residential runoff and assessing potential surrogates of fecal indicator organisms.
    Reano DC; Haver DL; Oki LR; Yates MV
    Water Res; 2015 May; 74():67-76. PubMed ID: 25710901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Elephant trail runoff and sediment dynamics in northern Thailand.
    Sidle RC; Ziegler AD
    J Environ Qual; 2010; 39(3):871-81. PubMed ID: 20400583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Integrating culture and molecular quantification of microbial contaminants into a predictive modeling framework in a low-lying, tidally-influenced coastal watershed.
    Price MT; Blackwood AD; Noble RT
    Sci Total Environ; 2021 Oct; 792():148232. PubMed ID: 34147794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Stratification and loading of fecal indicator bacteria (FIB) in a tidally muted urban salt marsh.
    Johnston KK; Dorsey JH; Saez JA
    Environ Monit Assess; 2015 Mar; 187(3):58. PubMed ID: 25647802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Patterns of sediment-associated fecal indicator bacteria in an urban estuary: Benthic-pelagic coupling and implications for shoreline water quality.
    O'Mullan GD; Juhl AR; Reichert R; Schneider E; Martinez N
    Sci Total Environ; 2019 Mar; 656():1168-1177. PubMed ID: 30625648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Bayesian model for flow-class dependent distributions of fecal-indicator bacterial concentration in surface waters.
    Schoen ME; Small MJ; Vanbriesen JM
    Water Res; 2010 Feb; 44(3):1006-16. PubMed ID: 19931885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Linking land-use type and stream water quality using spatial data of fecal indicator bacteria and heavy metals in the Yeongsan river basin.
    Kang JH; Lee SW; Cho KH; Ki SJ; Cha SM; Kim JH
    Water Res; 2010 Jul; 44(14):4143-57. PubMed ID: 20599099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 31.