These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

402 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20674555)

  • 1. Crossmodal congruency effects based on stimulus identity.
    Frings C; Spence C
    Brain Res; 2010 Oct; 1354():113-22. PubMed ID: 20674555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of attention on the illusory capture of motion in bimodal stimuli.
    Oruc I; Sinnett S; Bischof WF; Soto-Faraco S; Lock K; Kingstone A
    Brain Res; 2008 Nov; 1242():200-8. PubMed ID: 18514172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Temporal aspects of the visuotactile congruency effect.
    Shore DI; Barnes ME; Spence C
    Neurosci Lett; 2006 Jan; 392(1-2):96-100. PubMed ID: 16213655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The role of preparation and cue-modality in crossmodal task switching.
    Lukas S; Philipp AM; Koch I
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Jul; 134(3):318-22. PubMed ID: 20398881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Vision and touch in ageing: crossmodal selective attention and visuotactile spatial interactions.
    Poliakoff E; Ashworth S; Lowe C; Spence C
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(4):507-17. PubMed ID: 16098997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Auditory-somatosensory multisensory interactions in humans: dissociating detection and spatial discrimination.
    Sperdin HF; Cappe C; Murray MM
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Nov; 48(13):3696-705. PubMed ID: 20833194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influences of intra- and crossmodal grouping on visual and tactile Ternus apparent motion.
    Chen L; Shi Z; Müller HJ
    Brain Res; 2010 Oct; 1354():152-62. PubMed ID: 20659437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing the influence of schematic drawings of body parts on tactile discrimination performance using the crossmodal congruency task.
    Igarashi Y; Kitagawa N; Spence C; Ichihara S
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2007 Feb; 124(2):190-208. PubMed ID: 16759624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. On the inability to ignore touch when responding to vision in the crossmodal congruency task.
    Spence C; Walton M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2005; 118(1-2):47-70. PubMed ID: 15627409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. When a high-intensity "distractor" is better then a low-intensity one: modeling the effect of an auditory or tactile nontarget stimulus on visual saccadic reaction time.
    Diederich A; Colonius H
    Brain Res; 2008 Nov; 1242():219-30. PubMed ID: 18573240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Expected but omitted stimuli affect crossmodal interaction.
    Costantini M; Migliorati D; Donno B; Sirota M; Ferri F
    Cognition; 2018 Feb; 171():52-64. PubMed ID: 29107888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The contribution of response conflict, multisensory integration, and body-mediated attention to the crossmodal congruency effect.
    Marini F; Romano D; Maravita A
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 Mar; 235(3):873-887. PubMed ID: 27913817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The modality shift effect and the effectiveness of warning signals in different modalities.
    Rodway P
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2005 Oct; 120(2):199-226. PubMed ID: 15993828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The anterior N1 component as an index of modality shifting.
    Töllner T; Gramann K; Müller HJ; Eimer M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Sep; 21(9):1653-69. PubMed ID: 18767917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Tri-modal integration of visual, tactile and auditory signals for the perception of sequences of events.
    Bresciani JP; Dammeier F; Ernst MO
    Brain Res Bull; 2008 Apr; 75(6):753-60. PubMed ID: 18394521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The time-course of auditory and visual distraction effects in a new crossmodal paradigm.
    Bendixen A; Grimm S; Deouell LY; Wetzel N; Mädebach A; Schröger E
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jun; 48(7):2130-9. PubMed ID: 20385149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
    Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Congruency reversals in an accessory signal Simon task with auditory and visual stimuli.
    Soetens E; Maetens K; Zeischka P; Henderickx D
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Jul; 134(3):391-7. PubMed ID: 20451168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Visuotactile temporal order judgments in ageing.
    Poliakoff E; Shore DI; Lowe C; Spence C
    Neurosci Lett; 2006 Apr; 396(3):207-11. PubMed ID: 16356634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Audiovisual interactions depend on context of congruency.
    Sarmiento BR; Shore DI; Milliken B; Sanabria D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Apr; 74(3):563-74. PubMed ID: 22160743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.