BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

66 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20674733)

  • 1. What breaks a melody: perceiving F0 and intensity sequences with a cochlear implant.
    Cousineau M; Demany L; Meyer B; Pressnitzer D
    Hear Res; 2010 Oct; 269(1-2):34-41. PubMed ID: 20674733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Encoding a Melody Using Only Temporal Information for Cochlear-Implant and Normal-Hearing Listeners.
    Todd AE; Mertens G; Van de Heyning P; Landsberger DM
    Trends Hear; 2017; 21():2331216517739745. PubMed ID: 29161987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Review article: review of the literature on temporal resolution in listeners with cochlear hearing impairment: a critical assessment of the role of suprathreshold deficits.
    Reed CM; Braida LD; Zurek PM
    Trends Amplif; 2009 Mar; 13(1):4-43. PubMed ID: 19074452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Simulating the effects of spread of electric excitation on musical tuning and melody identification with a cochlear implant.
    Spahr AJ; Litvak LM; Dorman MF; Bohanan AR; Mishra LN
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Dec; 51(6):1599-606. PubMed ID: 18664681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Temporal Regularity Detection and Rate Discrimination in Cochlear-Implant Listeners.
    Gaudrain E; Deeks JM; Carlyon RP
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2017 Apr; 18(2):387-397. PubMed ID: 27687041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pitch perception and auditory stream segregation: implications for hearing loss and cochlear implants.
    Oxenham AJ
    Trends Amplif; 2008 Dec; 12(4):316-31. PubMed ID: 18974203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Rate discrimination, gap detection and ranking of temporal pitch in cochlear implant users.
    Cosentino S; Carlyon RP; Deeks JM; Parkinson W; Bierer JA
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2016 Aug; 17(4):371-82. PubMed ID: 27101997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of implantable hearing aids and neuroprosthesison music perception.
    Rahne T; Böhme L; Götze G
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2012; 2012():404590. PubMed ID: 22645422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Discrimination of Schroeder-phase harmonic complexes by normal-hearing and cochlear-implant listeners.
    Drennan WR; Longnion JK; Ruffin C; Rubinstein JT
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2008 Mar; 9(1):138-49. PubMed ID: 18066624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Relative pitch representations and invariance to timbre.
    McPherson MJ; McDermott JH
    Cognition; 2023 Mar; 232():105327. PubMed ID: 36495710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Role of Temporal Cues in Voluntary Stream Segregation for Cochlear Implant Users.
    Paredes-Gallardo A; Madsen SMK; Dau T; Marozeau J
    Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518773226. PubMed ID: 29766759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Deep neural network models reveal interplay of peripheral coding and stimulus statistics in pitch perception.
    Saddler MR; Gonzalez R; McDermott JH
    Nat Commun; 2021 Dec; 12(1):7278. PubMed ID: 34907158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Re-examining the upper limit of temporal pitch.
    Macherey O; Carlyon RP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Dec; 136(6):3186. PubMed ID: 25480066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Combination of spectral and binaurally created harmonics in a common central pitch processor.
    Gockel HE; Carlyon RP; Plack CJ
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2011 Apr; 12(2):253-60. PubMed ID: 21086147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Correct tonotopic representation is necessary for complex pitch perception.
    Oxenham AJ; Bernstein JG; Penagos H
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2004 Feb; 101(5):1421-5. PubMed ID: 14718671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Time-dependent discrimination advantages for harmonic sounds suggest efficient coding for memory.
    McPherson MJ; McDermott JH
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2020 Dec; 117(50):32169-32180. PubMed ID: 33262275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Relationships between vocal pitch perception and production: a developmental perspective.
    Heller Murray ES; Stepp CE
    Sci Rep; 2020 Mar; 10(1):3912. PubMed ID: 32127585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Role of Place Cues in Voluntary Stream Segregation for Cochlear Implant Users.
    Paredes-Gallardo A; Madsen SMK; Dau T; Marozeau J
    Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216517750262. PubMed ID: 29347886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pitch discrimination by ferrets for simple and complex sounds.
    Walker KM; Schnupp JW; Hart-Schnupp SM; King AJ; Bizley JK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Sep; 126(3):1321-35. PubMed ID: 19739746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Stimulus-dependent flexibility in non-human auditory pitch processing.
    Bregman MR; Patel AD; Gentner TQ
    Cognition; 2012 Jan; 122(1):51-60. PubMed ID: 21911217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.