These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

627 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20674733)

  • 21. Music training improves pitch perception in prelingually deafened children with cochlear implants.
    Chen JK; Chuang AY; McMahon C; Hsieh JC; Tung TH; Li LP
    Pediatrics; 2010 Apr; 125(4):e793-800. PubMed ID: 20211951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Production and perception of speech intonation in pediatric cochlear implant recipients and individuals with normal hearing.
    Peng SC; Tomblin JB; Turner CW
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):336-51. PubMed ID: 18344873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effects of age on melody and timbre perception in simulations of electro-acoustic and cochlear-implant hearing.
    Arehart KH; Croghan NB; Muralimanohar RK
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(2):195-202. PubMed ID: 24441739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Music to electric ears: pitch and timbre perception by cochlear implant patients.
    Pressnitzer D; Bestel J; Fraysse B
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2005 Dec; 1060():343-5. PubMed ID: 16597784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Fundamental-frequency discrimination based on temporal-envelope cues: Effects of bandwidth and interference.
    Mehta AH; Oxenham AJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Nov; 144(5):EL423. PubMed ID: 30522318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Song recognition by children and adolescents with cochlear implants.
    Vongpaisal T; Trehub SE; Schellenberg EG
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Oct; 49(5):1091-103. PubMed ID: 17077217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Cochlear implant-mediated perception of music.
    Limb CJ
    Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2006 Oct; 14(5):337-40. PubMed ID: 16974148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Assessing the pitch structure associated with multiple rates and places for cochlear implant users.
    Stohl JS; Throckmorton CS; Collins LM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Feb; 123(2):1043-53. PubMed ID: 18247906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Development of the adaptive music perception test.
    Kirchberger MJ; Russo FA
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(2):217-28. PubMed ID: 25350404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. From fragments to the whole: a comparison between cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners in music perception and enjoyment.
    Alexander AJ; Bartel L; Friesen L; Shipp D; Chen J
    J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2011 Feb; 40(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 21303594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Lateralization of interimplant timing and level differences in children who use bilateral cochlear implants.
    Salloum CA; Valero J; Wong DD; Papsin BC; van Hoesel R; Gordon KA
    Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):441-56. PubMed ID: 20489647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Improved fundamental frequency coding in cochlear implant signal processing.
    Milczynski M; Wouters J; van Wieringen A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Apr; 125(4):2260-71. PubMed ID: 19354401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Application of a pitch perception model to investigate the effect of stimulation field spread on the pitch ranking abilities of cochlear implant recipients.
    Erfanian Saeedi N; Blamey PJ; Burkitt AN; Grayden DB
    Hear Res; 2014 Oct; 316():129-37. PubMed ID: 25193552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The intensity-pitch relation revisited: monopolar versus bipolar cochlear stimulation.
    Arnoldner C; Riss D; Kaider A; Mair A; Wagenblast J; Baumgartner WD; Gstöttner W; Hamzavi JS
    Laryngoscope; 2008 Sep; 118(9):1630-6. PubMed ID: 18545213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluation of a Test Battery to Assess Perception of Music in Children With Cochlear Implants.
    Roy AT; Scattergood-Keepper L; Carver C; Jiradejvong P; Butler C; Limb CJ
    JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2014 Jun; 140(6):540-7. PubMed ID: 24722833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The MuSIC perception test: a novel battery for testing music perception of cochlear implant users.
    Brockmeier SJ; Fitzgerald D; Searle O; Fitzgerald H; Grasmeder M; Hilbig S; Vermiere K; Peterreins M; Heydner S; Arnold W
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2011 Feb; 12(1):10-20. PubMed ID: 21756454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Pulse-rate discrimination deficit in cochlear implant users: is the upper limit of pitch peripheral or central?
    Zhou N; Mathews J; Dong L
    Hear Res; 2019 Jan; 371():1-10. PubMed ID: 30423498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The perception of prosody and speaker gender in normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implant recipients.
    Meister H; Landwehr M; Pyschny V; Walger M; von Wedel H
    Int J Audiol; 2009 Jan; 48(1):38-48. PubMed ID: 19173112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The role of peripheral resolvability in pitch-sequence processing.
    Cousineau M; Demany L; Pressnitzer D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Nov; 128(5):EL236-41. PubMed ID: 21110532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Auditory stream segregation in cochlear implant listeners: measures based on temporal discrimination and interleaved melody recognition.
    Cooper HR; Roberts B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Oct; 126(4):1975-87. PubMed ID: 19813809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 32.