These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20674773)

  • 1. A relevant question for site balanced studies relates to the comparative predictability of minimization to the alternative of permuted blocks.
    McEntegart D
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2010 Nov; 31(6):507. PubMed ID: 20674773
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quantification methods were developed for selection bias by predictability of allocations with unequal block randomization.
    Dupin-Spriet T; Fermanian J; Spriet A
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Dec; 58(12):1269-76. PubMed ID: 16291471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Misguided precedent is not a reason to use permuted blocks.
    Berger VW
    Headache; 2006; 46(7):1210-2. PubMed ID: 16866731
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. New algorithm for treatment allocation reduced selection bias and loss of power in small trials.
    Hofmeijer J; Anema PC; van der Tweel I
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Feb; 61(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 18177784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Use of simulation to compare the performance of minimization with stratified blocked randomization.
    Toorawa R; Adena M; Donovan M; Jones S; Conlon J
    Pharm Stat; 2009; 8(4):264-78. PubMed ID: 18756580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. On the second role of the random element in minimization.
    Kuznetsova OM
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2010 Nov; 31(6):587-8. PubMed ID: 20673852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pseudo cluster randomization dealt with selection bias and contamination in clinical trials.
    Teerenstra S; Melis RJ; Peer PG; Borm GF
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2006 Apr; 59(4):381-6. PubMed ID: 16549260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Implementation and experience of a web-based allocation system with Pocock and Simon's minimization methods.
    Cai HW; Xia JL; Gao DH; Cao XM
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2010 Nov; 31(6):510-3. PubMed ID: 20674777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cluster randomized controlled trials.
    Puffer S; Torgerson DJ; Watson J
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2005 Oct; 11(5):479-83. PubMed ID: 16164589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Local IRBs, multicenter trials, and the ethics of internal amendments.
    Jansen LA
    IRB; 2005; 27(4):7-11. PubMed ID: 16220628
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Blinding protocols, treatment credibility, and expectancy: methodologic issues in clinical trials of osteopathic manipulative treatment.
    Licciardone JC; Russo DP
    J Am Osteopath Assoc; 2006 Aug; 106(8):457-63. PubMed ID: 16943515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Randomization with a posteriori constraints: description and properties.
    Gicquel S; Marion-Gallois R
    Stat Med; 2007 Nov; 26(27):5033-45. PubMed ID: 17721873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Choosing a control group.
    Gauvreau K; Pagano M
    Nutrition; 1994; 10(3):276-7. PubMed ID: 7919687
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Randomization procedures in orthopaedic trials.
    Randelli P; Arrigoni P; Lubowitz JH; Cabitza P; Denti M
    Arthroscopy; 2008 Jul; 24(7):834-8. PubMed ID: 18589273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Statistical considerations in evaluating pharmacogenomics-based clinical effect for confirmatory trials.
    Wang SJ; O'Neill RT; Hung HJ
    Clin Trials; 2010 Oct; 7(5):525-36. PubMed ID: 20595242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Minimizing predictability while retaining balance through the use of less restrictive randomization procedures.
    Berger VW; Ivanova A; Knoll MD
    Stat Med; 2003 Oct; 22(19):3017-28. PubMed ID: 12973784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dynamic balancing randomization in controlled clinical trials.
    Heritier S; Gebski V; Pillai A
    Stat Med; 2005 Dec; 24(24):3729-41. PubMed ID: 16320277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Eliminating bias in randomized controlled trials: importance of allocation concealment and masking.
    Viera AJ; Bangdiwala SI
    Fam Med; 2007 Feb; 39(2):132-7. PubMed ID: 17273956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Randomization and allocation concealment: a practical guide for researchers.
    Doig GS; Simpson F
    J Crit Care; 2005 Jun; 20(2):187-91; discussion 191-3. PubMed ID: 16139163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of treatment preferences on validity: a review.
    Sidani S; Miranda J; Epstein D; Fox M
    Can J Nurs Res; 2009 Dec; 41(4):52-67. PubMed ID: 20191713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.