These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20675554)

  • 21. Differential effects of sound level and temporal structure of calls on phonotaxis by female gray treefrogs, Hyla versicolor.
    Christie KW; Schul J; Feng AS
    J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2019 Apr; 205(2):223-238. PubMed ID: 30927060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Spatial release from masking in a free-field source identification task by gray treefrogs.
    Nityananda V; Bee MA
    Hear Res; 2012 Mar; 285(1-2):86-97. PubMed ID: 22240459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. AM representation in green treefrog auditory nerve fibers: neuroethological implications for pattern recognition and sound localization.
    Klump GM; Benedix JH; Gerhardt HC; Narins PM
    J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2004 Dec; 190(12):1011-21. PubMed ID: 15480704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Frequency channel-dependent selectivity for temporal call characteristics in gray treefrogs,
    Reichert MS; Höbel G
    J Exp Biol; 2017 Apr; 220(Pt 7):1256-1266. PubMed ID: 28104800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Treefrogs exploit temporal coherence to form perceptual objects of communication signals.
    Gupta S; Bee MA
    Biol Lett; 2020 Sep; 16(9):20200573. PubMed ID: 32961090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Hormonal modulation of phonotaxis and advertisement-call preferences in the gray treefrog (Hyla versicolor).
    Gordon NM; Gerhardt HC
    Horm Behav; 2009 Jan; 55(1):121-7. PubMed ID: 18926827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Call transmission efficiency in native and invasive anurans: competing hypotheses of divergence in acoustic signals.
    Llusia D; Gómez M; Penna M; Márquez R
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(10):e77312. PubMed ID: 24155940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Species specificity of temporal processing in the auditory midbrain of gray treefrogs: long-interval neurons.
    Hanson JL; Rose GJ; Leary CJ; Graham JA; Alluri RK; Vasquez-Opazo GA
    J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2016 Jan; 202(1):67-79. PubMed ID: 26614093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. An experimental test of noise-dependent voice amplitude regulation in Cope's grey treefrog (Hyla chrysoscelis).
    Love EK; Bee MA
    Anim Behav; 2010 Sep; 80(3):509-515. PubMed ID: 20823939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Long recording sequences: how to track the intra-individual variability of acoustic signals.
    Lengagne T; Gomez D; Josserand R; Voituron Y
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(5):e0123828. PubMed ID: 25970183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Phonotactic selectivity in two cryptic species of gray treefrogs: effects of differences in pulse rate, carrier frequency and playback level.
    Gerhardt HC
    J Exp Biol; 2008 Aug; 211(Pt 16):2609-16. PubMed ID: 18689414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Signal recognition by frogs in the presence of temporally fluctuating chorus-shaped noise.
    Vélez A; Bee MA
    Behav Ecol Sociobiol; 2010 Oct; 64(10):1695-1709. PubMed ID: 21170157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Female túngara frogs do not experience the continuity illusion.
    Baugh AT; Ryan MJ; Bernal XE; Rand AS; Bee MA
    Behav Neurosci; 2016 Feb; 130(1):62-74. PubMed ID: 26692450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Allometric escape and acoustic signal features facilitate high-frequency communication in an endemic Chinese primate.
    Riondato I; Gamba M; Tan CL; Niu K; Narins PM; Yang Y; Giacoma C
    J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2021 May; 207(3):327-336. PubMed ID: 33555413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Male antiphonal calls and phonotaxis evoked by female courtship calls in the large odorous frog (Odorrana graminea).
    Shen JX; Xu ZM; Narins PM
    J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2023 Jan; 209(1):69-77. PubMed ID: 35939131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Do frog-eating bats perceptually bind the complex components of frog calls?
    Jones PL; Farris HE; Ryan MJ; Page RA
    J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2013 Apr; 199(4):279-83. PubMed ID: 23322446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Temporal order and the evolution of complex acoustic signals.
    Gerhardt HC; Humfeld SC; Marshall VT
    Proc Biol Sci; 2007 Jul; 274(1619):1789-94. PubMed ID: 17507330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The acoustic adaptation hypothesis in a widely distributed South American frog: Southernmost signals propagate better.
    Velásquez NA; Moreno-Gómez FN; Brunetti E; Penna M
    Sci Rep; 2018 May; 8(1):6990. PubMed ID: 29725055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Masking release in temporally fluctuating noise depends on comodulation and overall level in Cope's gray treefrog.
    Bee MA; Vélez A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Oct; 144(4):2354. PubMed ID: 30404526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Dip listening or modulation masking? Call recognition by green treefrogs (Hyla cinerea) in temporally fluctuating noise.
    Vélez A; Höbel G; Gordon NM; Bee MA
    J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2012 Dec; 198(12):891-904. PubMed ID: 23069882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.