These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20675768)

  • 1. Mapping the strain distribution on the proximal femur with titanium and flexible-stemmed implants using digital image correlation.
    Tayton E; Evans S; O'Doherty D
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2010 Aug; 92(8):1176-81. PubMed ID: 20675768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Strain distribution in the proximal femur with flexible composite and metallic femoral components under axial and torsional loads.
    Otani T; Whiteside LA; White SE
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1993 May; 27(5):575-85. PubMed ID: 8314810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quantification of implant micromotion, strain shielding, and bone resorption with porous-coated anatomic medullary locking femoral prostheses.
    Engh CA; O'Connor D; Jasty M; McGovern TF; Bobyn JD; Harris WH
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1992 Dec; (285):13-29. PubMed ID: 1446429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Failure of cementless fixation of the femoral component in total hip arthroplasty.
    Otani T; Whiteside LA
    Orthop Clin North Am; 1992 Apr; 23(2):335-46. PubMed ID: 1570145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Changes in strain distribution of loaded proximal femora caused by different types of cementless femoral stems.
    Decking R; Puhl W; Simon U; Claes LE
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Jun; 21(5):495-501. PubMed ID: 16457913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Novel surface modifications of carbon fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone hip stem in an ovine model.
    Nakahara I; Takao M; Bandoh S; Bertollo N; Walsh WR; Sugano N
    Artif Organs; 2012 Jan; 36(1):62-70. PubMed ID: 21819435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Role of loads and prosthesis material properties on the mechanics of the proximal femur after total hip arthroplasty.
    Cheal EJ; Spector M; Hayes WC
    J Orthop Res; 1992 May; 10(3):405-22. PubMed ID: 1569504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biomechanical comparison of newly designed stemless prosthesis and conventional hip prosthesis--an experimental study.
    Tai CL; Lee MS; Chen WP; Hsieh PH; Lee PC; Shih CH
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2005; 15(3):239-49. PubMed ID: 15912004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cortical and interfacial bone changes around a non-cemented hip implant: simulations using a combined strain/damage remodelling algorithm.
    Scannell PT; Prendergast PJ
    Med Eng Phys; 2009 May; 31(4):477-88. PubMed ID: 19188086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Noncemented total hip arthroplasty: influence of extramedullary parameters on initial implant stability and on bone-implant interface stresses].
    Ramaniraka NA; Rakotomanana LR; Rubin PJ; Leyvraz P
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2000 Oct; 86(6):590-7. PubMed ID: 11060433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cementless implant composition and femoral stress. A finite element analysis.
    Namba RS; Keyak JH; Kim AS; Vu LP; Skinner HB
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1998 Feb; (347):261-7. PubMed ID: 9520899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of material properties of femoral hip components on bone remodeling.
    Weinans H; Huiskes R; Grootenboer HJ
    J Orthop Res; 1992 Nov; 10(6):845-53. PubMed ID: 1403299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The influence of design parameters on cortical strain distribution of a cementless titanium femoral stem.
    Gillies RM; Morberg PH; Bruce WJ; Turnbull A; Walsh WR
    Med Eng Phys; 2002 Mar; 24(2):109-14. PubMed ID: 11886829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Comparative periprosthetic bone density measurements of the proximal femur shaft using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) with experimental "Press Fit-gliding Stem Prosthesis"].
    Krüger A; Berli B; Lampert C; Kränzlin C; Morscher E
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1998; 136(2):115-25. PubMed ID: 9615973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biomechanical evaluation of two types of short-stemmed hip prostheses compared to the trust plate prosthesis by three-dimensional measurement of micromotions.
    Fottner A; Schmid M; Birkenmaier C; Mazoochian F; Plitz W; Volkmar J
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2009 Jun; 24(5):429-34. PubMed ID: 19307048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Conus hip prosthesis.
    Wagner H; Wagner M
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2001; 68(4):213-21. PubMed ID: 11706545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The biomechanical effect of anteversion and modular neck offset on stress shielding for short-stem versus conventional long-stem hip implants.
    Goshulak P; Samiezadeh S; Aziz MS; Bougherara H; Zdero R; Schemitsch EH
    Med Eng Phys; 2016 Mar; 38(3):232-40. PubMed ID: 26774671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Numerical investigations of stress shielding in total hip prostheses.
    Behrens BA; Wirth CJ; Windhagen H; Nolte I; Meyer-Lindenberg A; Bouguecha A
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2008 Jul; 222(5):593-600. PubMed ID: 18756678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The influence of design parameters on calcar stresses following femoral head arthroplasty.
    Cook SD; Klawitter JJ; Weinstein AM
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1980 Mar; 14(2):133-44. PubMed ID: 7358741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Novel approach for designing a low weight hip implant used in total hip arthroplasty adopting skeletal design techniques.
    Sivarasu S; Beulah P; Mathew L
    Artif Organs; 2011 Jun; 35(6):663-6. PubMed ID: 21668830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.