These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Visual estimation of spatial requirements for locomotion in novice wheelchair users. Higuchi T; Takada H; Matsuura Y; Imanaka K J Exp Psychol Appl; 2004 Mar; 10(1):55-66. PubMed ID: 15053702 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Pseudoneglect for the bisection of mental number lines. Loftus AM; Nicholls ME; Mattingley JB; Chapman HL; Bradshaw JL Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 May; 62(5):925-45. PubMed ID: 18780193 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Deviating to the right: using eyetracking to study the role of attention in navigation asymmetries. Robertson JS; Forte JD; Nicholls ME Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Apr; 77(3):830-43. PubMed ID: 25515431 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Rightward collisions and their association with pseudoneglect. Nicholls ME; Loftus AM; Orr CA; Barre N Brain Cogn; 2008 Nov; 68(2):166-70. PubMed ID: 18495310 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The relationship between collisions and pseudoneglect: is it right? Hatin B; Sykes Tottenham L; Oriet C Cortex; 2012 Sep; 48(8):997-1008. PubMed ID: 21696716 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Things that go bump in the right: the effect of unimanual activity on rightward collisions. Nicholls ME; Loftus A; Mayer K; Mattingley JB Neuropsychologia; 2007 Mar; 45(5):1122-6. PubMed ID: 16999981 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Visual search patterns in neglect: comparison of peripersonal and extrapersonal space. Butler BC; Lawrence M; Eskes GA; Klein R Neuropsychologia; 2009 Feb; 47(3):869-78. PubMed ID: 19154749 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Walking and wheelchair navigation in patients with left visual neglect. Turton AJ; Dewar SJ; Lievesley A; O'Leary K; Gabb J; Gilchrist ID Neuropsychol Rehabil; 2009 Apr; 19(2):274-90. PubMed ID: 18609014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of optokinetically induced rotatory self-motion on spatial perception and representation. Sándor PS; Bächtold D; Henn V; Brugger P Neuropsychiatry Neuropsychol Behav Neurol; 2000 Jul; 13(3):188-94. PubMed ID: 10910090 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Slant perception in near space is categorically biased: evidence for a vertical tendency. Durgin FH; Li Z; Hajnal A Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Oct; 72(7):1875-89. PubMed ID: 20952785 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dissociation of neglect subtypes with transcranial magnetic stimulation. Ghacibeh GA; Shenker JI; Winter KH; Triggs WJ; Heilman KM Neurology; 2007 Sep; 69(11):1122-7. PubMed ID: 17846411 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Rightward shift in spatial awareness with declining alertness. Manly T; Dobler VB; Dodds CM; George MA Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(12):1721-8. PubMed ID: 16154447 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Line bisection in left neglect: the importance of starting right. Urbanski M; Bartolomeo P Cortex; 2008; 44(7):782-93. PubMed ID: 18489959 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Rightward bisection errors for letter lines: the role of semantic information. Mohr C; Leonards U Neuropsychologia; 2007 Jan; 45(2):295-304. PubMed ID: 16945395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Rightward biases in free-viewing visual bisection tasks: implications for leftward responses biases on similar tasks. Elias LJ; Robinson B; Saucier DM Brain Cogn; 2005 Dec; 59(3):296-8. PubMed ID: 16293359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Paradoxical cross-over due to attention to high or low spatial frequencies. Niemeier M; Stojanoski B; Singh VW; Chu E Brain Cogn; 2008 Jun; 67(1):115-25. PubMed ID: 18243459 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cognitive load exacerbates rightward biases during computer maze navigation. Bartlett ML; Scott Gwinn O; Thomas NA; Nicholls MER Brain Cogn; 2020 Apr; 140():105547. PubMed ID: 32065991 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Putts that get missed on the right: investigating lateralized attentional biases and the nature of putting errors in golf. Roberts R; Turnbull OH J Sports Sci; 2010 Feb; 28(4):369-74. PubMed ID: 20155570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]