These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20675805)

  • 41. Recalibration of phonetic categories by lipread speech: measuring aftereffects after a 24-hour delay.
    Vroomen J; Baart M
    Lang Speech; 2009; 52(Pt 2-3):341-50. PubMed ID: 19624035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. On the intonation of German intonation questions: the role of the prenuclear region.
    Petrone C; Niebuhr O
    Lang Speech; 2014 Mar; 57(Pt 1):108-46. PubMed ID: 24754223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Don't Listen With Your Mouth Full: The Role of Facial Motor Action in Visual Speech Perception.
    Turner AC; McIntosh DN; Moody EJ
    Lang Speech; 2015 Jun; 58(Pt 2):267-78. PubMed ID: 26677646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Temporal constraints on the McGurk effect.
    Munhall KG; Gribble P; Sacco L; Ward M
    Percept Psychophys; 1996 Apr; 58(3):351-62. PubMed ID: 8935896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Integration of facial and newly learned visual cues in speech perception.
    Massaro D; Cohen MM; Meyer H; Stribling T; Sterling C; Vanderhyden S
    Am J Psychol; 2011; 124(3):341-54. PubMed ID: 21977695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Prosodic temporal alignment of co-speech gestures to speech facilitates referent resolution.
    Jesse A; Johnson EK
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Dec; 38(6):1567-81. PubMed ID: 22545598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Initiation of utterance planning in response to pre-recorded and "live" utterances.
    Sjerps MJ; Decuyper C; Meyer AS
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 Mar; 73(3):357-374. PubMed ID: 31544625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Phonetic matching of auditory and visual speech develops during childhood: evidence from sine-wave speech.
    Baart M; Bortfeld H; Vroomen J
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2015 Jan; 129():157-64. PubMed ID: 25258018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Respiratory constraints on speech production: starting an utterance.
    Slifka J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Dec; 114(6 Pt 1):3343-53. PubMed ID: 14714814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Limited visual control of the intelligibility of speech in face-to-face dialogue.
    Anderson AH; Bard EG; Sotillo C; Newlands A; Doherty-Sneddon G
    Percept Psychophys; 1997 May; 59(4):580-92. PubMed ID: 9158332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Cross-modal selective attention: on the difficulty of ignoring sounds at the locus of visual attention.
    Spence C; Ranson J; Driver J
    Percept Psychophys; 2000 Feb; 62(2):410-24. PubMed ID: 10723219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Coarticulation effects in lipreading.
    Benguerel AP; Pichora-Fuller MK
    J Speech Hear Res; 1982 Dec; 25(4):600-7. PubMed ID: 7162162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Phonetic recalibration of speech by text.
    Keetels M; Schakel L; Bonte M; Vroomen J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Apr; 78(3):938-45. PubMed ID: 26704562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Perceptuomotor compatibility effects in speech.
    Galantucci B; Fowler CA; Goldstein L
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Jul; 71(5):1138-49. PubMed ID: 19525543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Insincere utterances and gaze: eye contact during sarcastic statements.
    Williams JA; Burns EL; Harmon EA
    Percept Mot Skills; 2009 Apr; 108(2):565-72. PubMed ID: 19544962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. A computational approach to analyzing sentential speech perception: phoneme-to-phoneme stimulus-response alignment.
    Bernstein LE; Demorest ME; Eberhardt SP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Jun; 95(6):3617-22. PubMed ID: 8046151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Effects of talker variability on speechreading.
    Yakel DA; Rosenblum LD; Fortier MA
    Percept Psychophys; 2000 Oct; 62(7):1405-12. PubMed ID: 11143452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Imitation in shadowing words.
    Shockley K; Sabadini L; Fowler CA
    Percept Psychophys; 2004 Apr; 66(3):422-9. PubMed ID: 15283067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Reading your own lips: common-coding theory and visual speech perception.
    Tye-Murray N; Spehar BP; Myerson J; Hale S; Sommers MS
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2013 Feb; 20(1):115-9. PubMed ID: 23132604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Analysis of speechreading cues using an interleaved technique.
    Scheinberg JS
    J Commun Disord; 1980 Dec; 13(6):489-92. PubMed ID: 7451676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.