These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

70 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20675810)

  • 1. Decomposing the Garner interference paradigm: evidence for dissociations between macrolevel and microlevel performance.
    Dyson BJ; Quinlan PT
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Aug; 72(6):1676-91. PubMed ID: 20675810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Trial after trial: general processing consequences as a function of repetition and change in multidimensional sound.
    Dyson BJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Sep; 63(9):1770-88. PubMed ID: 20169505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Auditory event files: integrating auditory perception and action planning.
    Zmigrod S; Hommel B
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Feb; 71(2):352-62. PubMed ID: 19304624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Magnitude judgments of loudness change for discrete, dynamic, and hybrid stimuli.
    Pastore RE; Flint J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Apr; 73(3):886-907. PubMed ID: 21264709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. What makes a melody: The perceptual singularity of pitch sequences.
    Cousineau M; Demany L; Pressnitzer D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Dec; 126(6):3179-87. PubMed ID: 20000931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Interactive processing of timbre dimensions: a Garner interference study.
    Caclin A; Giard MH; Smith BK; McAdams S
    Brain Res; 2007 Mar; 1138():159-70. PubMed ID: 17261274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interaction among auditory dimensions: timbre, pitch, and loudness.
    Melara RD; Marks LE
    Percept Psychophys; 1990 Aug; 48(2):169-78. PubMed ID: 2385491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The distinction between integral and separable dimensions: evidence for the integrality of pitch and loudness.
    Grau JW; Kemler Nelson DG
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1988 Dec; 117(4):347-70. PubMed ID: 2974862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The influence of stimulus intensity and inter-stimulus interval on the detection of pitch and loudness changes.
    Schröger E
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1996 Nov; 100(6):517-26. PubMed ID: 8980416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Interactive processing of timbre dimensions: an exploration with event-related potentials.
    Caclin A; McAdams S; Smith BK; Giard MH
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Jan; 20(1):49-64. PubMed ID: 17919079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of expectations on loudness and loudness difference.
    Parker S; Moore JM; Bahraini S; Gunthert K; Zellner DA
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Aug; 74(6):1334-42. PubMed ID: 22669793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Interactions between auditory 'what' and 'where' pathways revealed by enhanced near-threshold discrimination of frequency and position.
    Tardif E; Spierer L; Clarke S; Murray MM
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Mar; 46(4):958-66. PubMed ID: 18191423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of stimulus intensity on the right ear advantage in dichotic listening.
    Hugdahl K; Westerhausen R; Alho K; Medvedev S; Hämäläinen H
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Jan; 431(1):90-4. PubMed ID: 18162310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Differential cortical processing of location and pitch changes in dichotic pitch.
    Johnson BW; Hautus MJ; Hayns AL; Fitzgibbon BM
    Neuroreport; 2006 Mar; 17(4):389-93. PubMed ID: 16514364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Detection of spatial cues in linear and logarithmic frequency-modulated sweeps.
    Hsieh IH; Saberi K
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Nov; 71(8):1876-89. PubMed ID: 19933570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Time errors and differential sensation weighting.
    Hellström A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1979 Aug; 5(3):460-77. PubMed ID: 528952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Action observation modulates auditory perception of the consequence of others' actions.
    Sato A
    Conscious Cogn; 2008 Dec; 17(4):1219-27. PubMed ID: 18299207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Selective attention to sound location or pitch studied with event-related brain potentials and magnetic fields.
    Degerman A; Rinne T; Särkkä AK; Salmi J; Alho K
    Eur J Neurosci; 2008 Jun; 27(12):3329-41. PubMed ID: 18598270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Contextual influences on interactive processing: effects of discriminability, quantity, and uncertainty.
    Melara RD; Mounts JR
    Percept Psychophys; 1994 Jul; 56(1):73-90. PubMed ID: 8084734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Electrophysiological evidence for early interaction between talker and linguistic information during speech perception.
    Kaganovich N; Francis AL; Melara RD
    Brain Res; 2006 Oct; 1114(1):161-72. PubMed ID: 16920083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.