These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

65 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20675810)

  • 21. Is a change as good with a rest? Task-dependent effects of inter-trial contingency on concurrent sound segregation.
    Dyson BJ; Alain C
    Brain Res; 2008 Jan; 1189():135-44. PubMed ID: 18078900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Selective attention to sound location or pitch studied with fMRI.
    Degerman A; Rinne T; Salmi J; Salonen O; Alho K
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1077(1):123-34. PubMed ID: 16515772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Atypical pattern of discriminating sound features in adults with Asperger syndrome as reflected by the mismatch negativity.
    Kujala T; Aho E; Lepistö T; Jansson-Verkasalo E; Nieminen-von Wendt T; von Wendt L; Näätänen R
    Biol Psychol; 2007 Apr; 75(1):109-14. PubMed ID: 17257732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Preattentive cortical-evoked responses to pure tones, harmonic tones, and speech: influence of music training.
    Nikjeh DA; Lister JJ; Frisch SA
    Ear Hear; 2009 Aug; 30(4):432-46. PubMed ID: 19494778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Stimulus processing constraints in audition.
    Dyson BJ; Quinlan PT
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Dec; 30(6):1117-31. PubMed ID: 15584819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Differential cerebral reactivity to shortest and longer tones: neuromagnetic and behavioral evidence.
    Cheng CH; Hsu WY; Shih YH; Lin HC; Liao KK; Wu ZA; Lin YY
    Hear Res; 2010 Sep; 268(1-2):260-70. PubMed ID: 20600746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Auditory memory for timbre.
    McKeown D; Wellsted D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Jun; 35(3):855-75. PubMed ID: 19485696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Transient brain responses predict the temporal dynamics of sound detection in humans.
    Mäkinen V; May P; Tiitinen H
    Neuroimage; 2004 Feb; 21(2):701-6. PubMed ID: 14980572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Systematic latency variation of the auditory evoked M100: from average to single-trial data.
    Salajegheh A; Link A; Elster C; Burghoff M; Sander T; Trahms L; Poeppel D
    Neuroimage; 2004 Sep; 23(1):288-95. PubMed ID: 15325376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evidence of stochastic resonance in an auditory discrimination task may reflect response bias.
    Shepherd D; Hautus MJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Nov; 71(8):1931-40. PubMed ID: 19933574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Range effects of an irrelevant dimension on classification.
    Huettel SA; Lockhead GR
    Percept Psychophys; 1999 Nov; 61(8):1624-45. PubMed ID: 10598475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Do N1/MMN, P3a, and RON form a strongly coupled chain reflecting the three stages of auditory distraction?
    Horváth J; Winkler I; Bendixen A
    Biol Psychol; 2008 Oct; 79(2):139-47. PubMed ID: 18468765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effects of intensity and location on sound location discrimination in macaque monkeys.
    Recanzone GH; Beckerman NS
    Hear Res; 2004 Dec; 198(1-2):116-24. PubMed ID: 15567608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Garner interference is not solely driven by stimulus uncertainty.
    Burns DM
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Dec; 23(6):1846-1853. PubMed ID: 27246090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Perceptual primacy of dimensions: support for a model of dimensional interaction.
    Melara RD; Marks LE
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1990 May; 16(2):398-414. PubMed ID: 2142208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evidence for impaired sound intensity processing in schizophrenia.
    Bach DR; Buxtorf K; Strik WK; Neuhoff JG; Seifritz E
    Schizophr Bull; 2011 Mar; 37(2):426-31. PubMed ID: 19729389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Stimulus-specific learning: disrupting the bow effect in absolute identification.
    Dodds P; Donkin C; Brown SD; Heathcote A; Marley AA
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Aug; 73(6):1977-86. PubMed ID: 21671155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Contextual processing of multidimensional and unidimensional auditory stimuli.
    Marks LE
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1993 Apr; 19(2):227-49. PubMed ID: 8473837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Visual-auditory interaction in speeded classification: role of stimulus difference.
    Ben-Artzi E; Marks LE
    Percept Psychophys; 1995 Nov; 57(8):1151-62. PubMed ID: 8539090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The nature of Garner interference: The role of uncertainty, information, and variation in the breakdown in selective attention.
    Niv L; Moran R; Algom D
    Cognition; 2022 Jan; 218():104950. PubMed ID: 34768122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.