These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20675811)

  • 1. Redundancy gains in simple responses and go/no-go tasks.
    Gondan M; Götze C; Greenlee MW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Aug; 72(6):1692-709. PubMed ID: 20675811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A permutation test for the race model inequality.
    Gondan M
    Behav Res Methods; 2010 Feb; 42(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 20160282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of spatial and selective attention on basic multisensory integration.
    Gondan M; Blurton SP; Hughes F; Greenlee MW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Dec; 37(6):1887-97. PubMed ID: 21967270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The influence of action on visual search: behavioral response toward stimuli modifies the selection process.
    Buttaccio DR; Hahn S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Jul; 73(5):1453-66. PubMed ID: 21491163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of response task and accessory stimuli on redundancy gain: tests of the hemispheric coactivation model.
    Miller J; Van Nes F
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Aug; 33(4):829-44. PubMed ID: 17683231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The detection of feature singletons defined in two dimensions is based on salience summation, rather than on serial exhaustive or interactive race architectures.
    Zehetleitner M; Krummenacher J; Müller HJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Nov; 71(8):1739-59. PubMed ID: 19933559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Perceptual basis of redundancy gains in visual pop-out search.
    Töllner T; Zehetleitner M; Krummenacher J; Müller HJ
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Jan; 23(1):137-50. PubMed ID: 20044891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
    Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Serial and parallel attentive visual searches: evidence from cumulative distribution functions of response times.
    Sung K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Dec; 34(6):1372-88. PubMed ID: 19045981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Success and failure at dual-task coordination by younger and older adults.
    Hartley AA; Maquestiaux F
    Psychol Aging; 2007 Jun; 22(2):215-22. PubMed ID: 17563177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The auditory redundant signals effect: an influence of number of stimuli or number of percepts?
    Schröter H; Frei LS; Ulrich R; Miller J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Aug; 71(6):1375-84. PubMed ID: 19633352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Feature-based attentional modulation increases with stimulus separation in divided-attention tasks.
    Sally SL; Vidnyánsky Z; Papathomas TV
    Spat Vis; 2009; 22(6):529-53. PubMed ID: 19891852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Display size effects in visual search: analyses of reaction time distributions as mixtures.
    Reynolds A; Miller J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 May; 62(5):988-1009. PubMed ID: 19048454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Training and transfer of training in the search for camouflaged targets.
    Boot WR; Neider MB; Kramer AF
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 May; 71(4):950-63. PubMed ID: 19429971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Redundancy effects of a moving distractor generated by alerting and orienting.
    Utochkin IS
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Nov; 71(8):1825-30. PubMed ID: 19933565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of warning stimulus modality on blink startle modification in reaction time tasks.
    Lipp OV; Siddle DA; Dall PJ
    Psychophysiology; 2000 Jan; 37(1):55-64. PubMed ID: 10705767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Top-down feature-based selection of matching features for audio-visual synchrony discrimination.
    Fujisaki W; Nishida S
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Mar; 433(3):225-30. PubMed ID: 18281153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Response to an intervening event reverses nonspatial repetition effects in 2AFC tasks: nonspatial IOR?
    Spadaro A; He C; Milliken B
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Feb; 74(2):331-49. PubMed ID: 22160785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A systematic investigation of the functional neuroanatomy of auditory and visual phonological processing.
    Burton MW; Locasto PC; Krebs-Noble D; Gullapalli RP
    Neuroimage; 2005 Jul; 26(3):647-61. PubMed ID: 15955475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Effect of task difficulty on hemispheric differences in visual image processing].
    Hildebrandt H; Fresenborg I; Engel A
    Z Exp Psychol; 1995; 42(2):256-79. PubMed ID: 7497072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.