172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20675954)
1. Comparative adaptation accuracy of acrylic denture bases evaluated by two different methods.
Lee CJ; Bok SB; Bae JY; Lee HH
Dent Mater J; 2010 Aug; 29(4):411-7. PubMed ID: 20675954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dimensional stability of complete denture permanent acrylic resin denture bases; A comparison of dimensions before and after a second curing cycle.
Fenlon MR; Juszczyk AS; Rodriguez JM; Curtis RV
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2010 Mar; 18(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 20397501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of the precision of three implant transfer impression techniques using two elastomeric impression materials.
Mostafa TM; Elgendy MN; Kashef NA; Halim MM
Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(6):525-8. PubMed ID: 21209987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An Investigation into the Accuracy of Two Currently Available Dental Impression Materials in the Construction of Cobalt-Chromium Frameworks for Removable Partial Dentures.
Dubal RK; Friel T; Taylor PD
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2015 Mar; 23(1):16-28. PubMed ID: 26415334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of storage period and effect of different brands of acrylic resin on the dimensional accuracy of the maxillary denture base.
Miéssi AC; Goiato MC; dos Santos DM; Dekon SF; Okida RC
Braz Dent J; 2008; 19(3):204-8. PubMed ID: 18949291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Failure modes with point loading of three commercially available denture teeth.
Moffitt AR; Woody RD; Parel SM; Miller BH
J Prosthodont; 2008 Aug; 17(6):432-8. PubMed ID: 18482363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of different curing temperatures on the distortion at the posterior peripheral seal: an in vitro study.
Pasam N; Hallikerimath RB; Arora A; Gilra S
Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(3):301-4. PubMed ID: 23059563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Experimental study on the use of spacer foils in two-step putty and wash impression procedures using silicone impression materials.
Mann K; Davids A; Range U; Richter G; Boening K; Reitemeier B
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Apr; 113(4):316-22. PubMed ID: 25453563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Defining the posterior palatal seal on a definitive impression for a maxillary complete denture by using a nonfluid wax addition technique.
Wicks R; Ahuja S; Jain V
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Dec; 112(6):1597-600. PubMed ID: 25258260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of a new tension system, used in acrylic resin flasking, on the dimensional stability of denture bases.
Consani RL; Domitti SS; Consani S
J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Sep; 88(3):285-9. PubMed ID: 12426498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Determining the accuracy of stock and custom tray impression/casts.
Millstein P; Maya A; Segura C
J Oral Rehabil; 1998 Aug; 25(8):645-8. PubMed ID: 9781870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effects of different storage conditions on polyether and polyvinylsiloxane impressions.
Purk JH; Willes MG; Tira DE; Eick JD; Hung SH
J Am Dent Assoc; 1998 Jul; 129(7):1014-21. PubMed ID: 9685767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Posterior palatal seal adaptation: influence of processing technique, palate shape and immersion.
Sykora O; Sutow EJ
J Oral Rehabil; 1993 Jan; 20(1):19-31. PubMed ID: 8429420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reinforcement of a mandibular complete denture with internal metal framework.
Balch JH; Smith PD; Marin MA; Cagna DR
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Mar; 109(3):202-5. PubMed ID: 23522371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of different impression techniques for internal-connection implants.
Lee YJ; Heo SJ; Koak JY; Kim SK
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):823-30. PubMed ID: 19865622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Management of excessive movable tissue: a modified impression technique.
Shum MH; Pow EH
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):387-9. PubMed ID: 24461949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dimensional accuracy of dental casts: influence of tray material, impression material, and time.
Thongthammachat S; Moore BK; Barco MT; Hovijitra S; Brown DT; Andres CJ
J Prosthodont; 2002 Jun; 11(2):98-108. PubMed ID: 12087547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prosthetic rehabilitation with collapsible hybrid acrylic resin and permanent silicone soft liner complete denture of a patient with scleroderma-induced microstomia.
Singh K; Gupta N; Gupta R; Abrahm D
J Prosthodont; 2014 Jul; 23(5):412-6. PubMed ID: 24417310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An acrylic resin shell with guide extensions for accurate positioning of provisional restorations.
Infante L; Lee H
J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Nov; 106(5):340-2. PubMed ID: 22024185
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of the linear dimensional accuracy of denture bases cured the by conventional method and by the new press technique.
Abby A; Kumar R; Shibu J; Chakravarthy R
Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(2):200-4. PubMed ID: 21891885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
