These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20676816)

  • 1. Bonded orthodontic retainers: a comparison of initial bond strength of different wire-and-composite combinations.
    Aldrees AM; Al-Mutairi TK; Hakami ZW; Al-Malki MM
    J Orofac Orthop; 2010 Jul; 71(4):290-9. PubMed ID: 20676816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Tensile test and interface retention forces between wires and composites in lingual fixed retainers.
    Paolone MG; Kaitsas R; Obach P; Kaitsas V; Benedicenti S; Sorrenti E; Barberis F
    Int Orthod; 2015 Jun; 13(2):210-220. PubMed ID: 26003122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Adhesive properties of bonded orthodontic retainers to enamel: stainless steel wire vs fiber-reinforced composites.
    Foek DL; Ozcan M; Krebs E; Sandham A
    J Adhes Dent; 2009 Oct; 11(5):381-90. PubMed ID: 19841765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of prior sandblasting of the wire on the shear bond strength of two different types of lingual retainers.
    Kilinç DD; Sayar G
    Int Orthod; 2018 Jun; 16(2):294-303. PubMed ID: 29631817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Shear bond strength of different fixed orthodontic retainers.
    Al-Nimri K; Al-Nimri J
    Aust Orthod J; 2015 Nov; 31(2):178-83. PubMed ID: 26999891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Resin-modified glass ionomer cements for bonding orthodontic retainers.
    Baysal A; Uysal T
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 32(3):254-8. PubMed ID: 19793779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Stability of the bonded lingual wire retainer-a study of the initial bond strength.
    Radlanski RJ; Zain ND
    J Orofac Orthop; 2004 Jul; 65(4):321-35. PubMed ID: 15289924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of microleakage and shear bond strength of ribbon and twisted wire retainers bonded on human mandibular incisors with two different types of adhesives with and without primer: An in-vitro study.
    Kavousinejad S; Hosseinzadeh Nik T; Saffar Shahroudi A
    Int Orthod; 2022 Dec; 20(4):100693. PubMed ID: 36243617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Different lingual retainer composites and the microleakage between enamel-composite and wire-composite interfaces.
    Uysal T; Ulker M; Baysal A; Usumez S
    Angle Orthod; 2008 Sep; 78(5):941-6. PubMed ID: 18298203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Antibacterial activity and debonding force of different lingual retainers bonded with conventional composite and nanoparticle containing composite: An in vitro study.
    Kotta M; Gorantla S; Muddada V; Lenka RR; Karri T; Kumar S; Tivanani M
    J World Fed Orthod; 2020 Jun; 9(2):80-85. PubMed ID: 32672659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Debonding force and deformation of two multi-stranded lingual retainer wires bonded to incisor enamel: an in vitro study.
    Cooke ME; Sherriff M
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Dec; 32(6):741-6. PubMed ID: 20547494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An in vitro comparison between a bonded retainer system and a directly bonded flexible spiral wire retainer.
    Bryan DC; Sherriff M
    Eur J Orthod; 1995 Apr; 17(2):143-51. PubMed ID: 7781723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Enhancing wire-composite bond strength of bonded retainers with wire surface treatment.
    Oesterle LJ; Shellhart WC; Henderson S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Jun; 119(6):625-31. PubMed ID: 11395707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bonded orthodontic retainers: the wire-composite interface.
    Bearn DR; McCabe JF; Gordon PH; Aird JC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Jan; 111(1):67-74. PubMed ID: 9009926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative evaluation of microleakage of lingual retainer wires bonded with three different lingual retainer composites: an in vitro study.
    Nimbalkar-Patil S; Vaz A; Patil PG
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2014 Nov; 8(11):ZC83-7. PubMed ID: 25584325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. "Clinical comparison of bond failure rate between two types of mandibular canine-canine bonded orthodontic retainers- a randomized clinical trial".
    Nagani NI; Ahmed I; Tanveer F; Khursheed HM; Farooqui WA
    BMC Oral Health; 2020 Jun; 20(1):180. PubMed ID: 32600325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In vitro debonding of orthodontic retainers analyzed with finite element analysis.
    Milheiro A; de Jager N; Feilzer AJ; Kleverlaan CJ
    Eur J Orthod; 2015 Oct; 37(5):491-6. PubMed ID: 25452631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Flowable composites for bonding orthodontic retainers.
    Tabrizi S; Salemis E; Usumez S
    Angle Orthod; 2010 Jan; 80(1):195-200. PubMed ID: 19852661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparative evaluation of lingual retainer failure bonded with or without liquid resin.
    Bazargani F; Jacobson S; Lennartsson B
    Angle Orthod; 2012 Jan; 82(1):84-7. PubMed ID: 21721947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Microleakage between composite-wire and composite-enamel interfaces of flexible spiral wire retainers. Part 2: comparison of amorphous calcium phosphate-containing adhesive with conventional lingual retainer composite.
    Uysal T; Ulker M; Baysal A; Usumez S
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Dec; 31(6):652-7. PubMed ID: 19858075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.