85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20677265)
1. The influence of the b-value combination on apparent diffusion coefficient based differentiation between malignant and benign tissue in cervical cancer.
Hoogendam JP; Klerkx WM; de Kort GA; Bipat S; Zweemer RP; Sie-Go DM; Verheijen RH; Mali WP; Veldhuis WB
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Aug; 32(2):376-82. PubMed ID: 20677265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Diffusion weighted imaging features of normal uterine cervix and cervical carcinoma].
Zhang Y; Liang BL; Gao L; Ye RX; Shen J; Zhong JL
Ai Zheng; 2007 May; 26(5):508-12. PubMed ID: 17672942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quantitative diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of normal and diseased uterine zones.
Kilickesmez O; Bayramoglu S; Inci E; Cimilli T; Kayhan A
Acta Radiol; 2009 Apr; 50(3):340-7. PubMed ID: 19235579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of uterine cervical cancer.
Liu Y; Bai R; Sun H; Liu H; Wang D
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2009; 33(6):858-62. PubMed ID: 19940650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Markedly high signal intensity lesions in the uterine cervix on T2-weighted imaging: differentiation between mucin-producing carcinomas and nabothian cysts.
Li H; Sugimura K; Okizuka H; Yoshida M; Maruyama R; Takahashi K; Miyazaki K
Radiat Med; 1999; 17(2):137-43. PubMed ID: 10399782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Whole-Lesion Histogram Analysis of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient for the Assessment of Cervical Cancer.
Guan Y; Shi H; Chen Y; Liu S; Li W; Jiang Z; Wang H; He J; Zhou Z; Ge Y
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2016; 40(2):212-7. PubMed ID: 26720205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Value of diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the differentiation between benign and malignant cervical lymph nodes.
Holzapfel K; Duetsch S; Fauser C; Eiber M; Rummeny EJ; Gaa J
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Dec; 72(3):381-7. PubMed ID: 18995981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Cancer of the uterine cervix is the second most frequent gynecologic pathology in the world].
Thille A
JBR-BTR; 2003; 86(1):16-8. PubMed ID: 12807069
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Causes of artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging of the normal uterine cervix].
Rouanet JP; Batch T; de Graef M; Karam R; Maubon A
JBR-BTR; 2003; 86(1):25-6. PubMed ID: 12693378
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of uterine endometrial cancer.
Tamai K; Koyama T; Saga T; Umeoka S; Mikami Y; Fujii S; Togashi K
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Sep; 26(3):682-7. PubMed ID: 17729360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quantitative diffusion weighted imaging for differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions: the influence of the choice of b-values.
Peters NH; Vincken KL; van den Bosch MA; Luijten PR; Mali WP; Bartels LW
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 May; 31(5):1100-5. PubMed ID: 20432344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Apparent diffusion coefficient in malignant lymphoma and carcinoma involving cavernous sinus evaluated by line scan diffusion-weighted imaging.
Maeda M; Maier SE; Sakuma H; Ishida M; Takeda K
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Sep; 24(3):543-8. PubMed ID: 16888792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Diagnosis of recurrence of cervix carcinoma using dynamic MRI: correlation of pharmacokinetic analysis and histopathology].
Hawighorst H; Knapstein PG; Schaeffer U; Brix G; Weikel P; Essig M; Zuna I; Knopp MV
Radiologe; 1995 Dec; 35(12):945-51. PubMed ID: 8584638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Relative apparent diffusion coefficient: determination of reference site and validation of benefit for detecting metastatic lymph nodes in uterine cervical cancer.
Park SO; Kim JK; Kim KA; Park BW; Kim N; Cho G; Choi HJ; Cho KS
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Feb; 29(2):383-90. PubMed ID: 19161191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison between two-point and four-point methods for quantification of apparent diffusion coefficient of normal liver parenchyma and focal lesions. Value of normalization with spleen.
Papanikolaou N; Gourtsoyianni S; Yarmenitis S; Maris T; Gourtsoyiannis N
Eur J Radiol; 2010 Feb; 73(2):305-9. PubMed ID: 19091503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prostate cancer detection: comparison of T2-weighted imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging, proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging, and the three techniques combined.
Chen M; Dang HD; Wang JY; Zhou C; Li SY; Wang WC; Zhao WF; Yang ZH; Zhong CY; Li GZ
Acta Radiol; 2008 Jun; 49(5):602-10. PubMed ID: 18568549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Detection of lymph node metastasis in cervical and uterine cancers by diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging at 3T.
Lin G; Ho KC; Wang JJ; Ng KK; Wai YY; Chen YT; Chang CJ; Ng SH; Lai CH; Yen TC
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Jul; 28(1):128-35. PubMed ID: 18581404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diffusion tensor MRI: preliminary anisotropy measures and mapping of breast tumors.
Partridge SC; Ziadloo A; Murthy R; White SW; Peacock S; Eby PR; DeMartini WB; Lehman CD
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Feb; 31(2):339-47. PubMed ID: 20099346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Enhanced mass on contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging: Lesion characterization using combination of dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR images.
Yabuuchi H; Matsuo Y; Okafuji T; Kamitani T; Soeda H; Setoguchi T; Sakai S; Hatakenaka M; Kubo M; Sadanaga N; Yamamoto H; Honda H
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Nov; 28(5):1157-65. PubMed ID: 18972357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Invasiveness of cancers of the uterine cervix].
Roy C
JBR-BTR; 2003; 86(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 12807070
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
