These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20677952)

  • 1. Impulse debracketing compared to conventional debonding.
    Knösel M; Mattysek S; Jung K; Sadat-Khonsari R; Kubein-Meesenburg D; Bauss O; Ziebolz D
    Angle Orthod; 2010 Nov; 80(6):1036-44. PubMed ID: 20677952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Suitability of orthodontic brackets for rebonding and reworking following removal by air pressure pulses and conventional debracketing techniques.
    Knösel M; Mattysek S; Jung K; Kubein-Meesenburg D; Sadat-Khonsari R; Ziebolz D
    Angle Orthod; 2010 Jul; 80(4):461-7. PubMed ID: 20482349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of simulated debracketing on enamel damage.
    Su MZ; Lai EH; Chang JZ; Chen HJ; Chang FH; Chiang YC; Lin CP
    J Formos Med Assoc; 2012 Oct; 111(10):560-6. PubMed ID: 23089691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of bracket debonding force between two conventional resin adhesives and a resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement: an in vitro and in vivo study.
    Shammaa I; Ngan P; Kim H; Kao E; Gladwin M; Gunel E; Brown C
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Oct; 69(5):463-9. PubMed ID: 10515145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Orthodontic bracket removal using conventional and ultrasonic debonding techniques, enamel loss, and time requirements.
    Krell KV; Courey JM; Bishara SE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 Mar; 103(3):258-66. PubMed ID: 8456784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of various debonding and adhesive clearance methods on enamel surface: an in vitro study.
    Fan XC; Chen L; Huang XF
    BMC Oral Health; 2017 Feb; 17(1):58. PubMed ID: 28241812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of the debonding characteristics of two innovative ceramic bracket designs.
    Bishara SE; Olsen ME; VonWald L; Jakobsen JR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Jul; 116(1):86-92. PubMed ID: 10393585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Laboratory evaluation of a compomer and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement for orthodontic bonding.
    Millett DT; Cattanach D; McFadzean R; Pattison J; McColl J
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Feb; 69(1):58-63; discussion 64. PubMed ID: 10022186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effects of bracket removal on enamel.
    Heravi F; Rashed R; Raziee L
    Aust Orthod J; 2008 Nov; 24(2):110-5. PubMed ID: 19113075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of enamel surfaces after bracket debonding: an in-vivo study with scanning electron microscopy.
    Alessandri Bonetti G; Zanarini M; Incerti Parenti S; Lattuca M; Marchionni S; Gatto MR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Nov; 140(5):696-702. PubMed ID: 22051490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Er:YAG Laser for Metal and Ceramic Bracket Debonding: An In Vitro Study on Intrapulpal Temperature, SEM, and EDS Analysis.
    Grzech-Leśniak K; Matys J; Żmuda-Stawowiak D; Mroczka K; Dominiak M; Brugnera Junior A; Gruber R; Romanos GE; Sculean A
    Photomed Laser Surg; 2018 Nov; 36(11):595-600. PubMed ID: 29905504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of different debonding techniques on the enamel surface: an in vitro qualitative study.
    Zarrinnia K; Eid NM; Kehoe MJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Sep; 108(3):284-93. PubMed ID: 7661146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The extent of enamel surface fractures. A quantitative comparison of thermally debonded ceramic and mechanically debonded metal brackets by energy dispersive micro- and image-analysis.
    Stratmann U; Schaarschmidt K; Wegener H; Ehmer U
    Eur J Orthod; 1996 Dec; 18(6):655-62. PubMed ID: 9009430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Comparative Evaluation of Enamel Surface Roughness of Two Different Bonding Adhesives After Debonding With Atomic Force Microscopy.
    Doddavarapu S; K B; Singaraju GS; Yamini Priyanka JS; Vivek Reddy G; Mandava P
    Cureus; 2022 Nov; 14(11):e31661. PubMed ID: 36420047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Safe Debonding of Fixed Appliances: A Comparison of Traditional Techniques and LODI Devices on Different Bracket Types in Terms of Enamel Cracks, Site of Bond Failure, and Bracket Reusability.
    Gibas-Stanek M; Pihut M
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Sep; 18(19):. PubMed ID: 34639565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Enamel surface morphology after bracket debonding.
    Osorio R; Toledano M; García-Godoy F
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1998; 65(5):313-7, 354. PubMed ID: 9795734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of enamel surface integrity after orthodontic bracket debonding: comparison of three different system.
    Ghaleb L; Al-Worafi NA; Thawaba A; Abdulqader AA; Alkamel A; Abdo Y; Yang Z; Noman N; Al-Aroomi MA; Yulou T
    BMC Oral Health; 2024 Mar; 24(1):358. PubMed ID: 38509532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of different orthodontic adhesives and resin removal techniques on enamel color alteration.
    Boncuk Y; Cehreli ZC; Polat-Özsoy Ö
    Angle Orthod; 2014 Jul; 84(4):634-41. PubMed ID: 24313735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A clinical evaluation of a glass ionomer cement as an orthodontic bonding adhesive compared with an acrylic resin.
    Norevall LI; Marcusson A; Persson M
    Eur J Orthod; 1996 Aug; 18(4):373-84. PubMed ID: 8921659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of different bonding and debonding techniques on debonding ceramic orthodontic brackets.
    Sinha PK; Nanda RS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Aug; 112(2):132-7. PubMed ID: 9267223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.