These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2067799)
21. Institute of Medicine recommends new P4P system for Medicare. Healthcare Benchmarks Qual Improv; 2006 Dec; 13(12):133-7. PubMed ID: 17153048 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Medicare peer review organizations. Jost TS Qual Assur Health Care; 1989; 1(4):235-48. PubMed ID: 2490969 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Legislative update ... quality of care under the Medicare program. Roper WL Health Care Financ Rev; 1986; 8(1):87-91. PubMed ID: 10311781 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. IOM to develop 'value index'. Carlson J Mod Healthc; 2010 Oct; 40(40):10. PubMed ID: 21038573 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Changing health care practices in Medicare's Health Care Quality Improvement Program. Jencks SF Jt Comm J Qual Improv; 1995 Jul; 21(7):343-7. PubMed ID: 7581738 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. HCFA's health care quality improvement program: the medical informatics challenge. Grant JB; Hayes RP; Pates RD; Elward KS; Ballard DJ J Am Med Inform Assoc; 1996; 3(1):15-26. PubMed ID: 8750387 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Perspectives. Push for new directions in quality assurance. Traska MR Faulkner Grays Med Health; 1990 Jul; 44(26):suppl 4 p.. PubMed ID: 10105024 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Improving the quality of health care. Quality at a crossroads. Coye MJ; Detmer DE Milbank Q; 1998; 76(4):759-68. PubMed ID: 9879314 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Quality assurance. PROs struggle to keep role in private Medicare plans. Gardner J Mod Healthc; 1997 Jun; 27(25):52. PubMed ID: 10167951 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Medicare PROs and the assessment of quality: should physician-specific quality data be released to consumers? Baker N J Health Hosp Law; 1992 Apr; 25(4):97-109, 117. PubMed ID: 10123435 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Quality improvement at the national level. Lessons from the Cooperative Cardiovascular Project. Marciniak TA; Mosedale L; Ellerbeck EF Eval Health Prof; 1998 Dec; 21(4):525-36. PubMed ID: 10351564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Perspectives. Cops or colleagues? Fuzzy standards for judging PROs. Cunningham R Faulkner Grays Med Health; 1996 May; 50(20):suppl 1-4. PubMed ID: 10156158 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Health care quality improvement in Florida. Ashkar F; Barnett J J Fla Med Assoc; 1998 Apr; 85(1):6-7. PubMed ID: 9782718 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Watchdog on a short chain. How good are PPS's quality-of-care reviewers? Kotelchuck R Health PAC Bull; 1987 Jun; 17(3):19-22. PubMed ID: 10301612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Medicare and the nurse. The peer review organization (PRO). Harris MD; McDonald M Home Healthc Nurse; 1991; 9(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 1993616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Quality review in the Peer Review Organization Program. Kelly JT; Feldman SE; Ross JE Qual Assur Util Rev; 1987 Nov; 2(4):107-10. PubMed ID: 2980915 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]