These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20678237)

  • 1. Comparison study of microarray meta-analysis methods.
    Campain A; Yang YH
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2010 Aug; 11():408. PubMed ID: 20678237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Robust microarray meta-analysis identifies differentially expressed genes for clinical prediction.
    Phan JH; Young AN; Wang MD
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2012; 2012():989637. PubMed ID: 23365541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Identification of suitable genes contributes to lung adenocarcinoma clustering by multiple meta-analysis methods.
    Yang ZH; Zheng R; Gao Y; Zhang Q
    Clin Respir J; 2016 Sep; 10(5):631-46. PubMed ID: 25619939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Combining multiple microarray studies using bootstrap meta-analysis.
    Barrett AB; Phan JH; Wang MD
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2008; 2008():5660-3. PubMed ID: 19164001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Meta-analysis methods for combining multiple expression profiles: comparisons, statistical characterization and an application guideline.
    Chang LC; Lin HM; Sibille E; Tseng GC
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2013 Dec; 14():368. PubMed ID: 24359104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Meta-analysis of breast cancer microarray studies in conjunction with conserved cis-elements suggest patterns for coordinate regulation.
    Smith DD; Saetrom P; Snøve O; Lundberg C; Rivas GE; Glackin C; Larson GP
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Jan; 9():63. PubMed ID: 18226260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Not proper ROC curves as new tool for the analysis of differentially expressed genes in microarray experiments.
    Parodi S; Pistoia V; Muselli M
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Oct; 9():410. PubMed ID: 18834513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Exploring the feasibility of next-generation sequencing and microarray data meta-analysis.
    Wu PY; Phan JH; Wang MD
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2011; 2011():7618-21. PubMed ID: 22256102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Meta analysis algorithms for microarray gene expression data using gene regulatory networks.
    Kazmi SA; Kim YA; Shin DG
    Int J Data Min Bioinform; 2010; 4(5):487-504. PubMed ID: 21133037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Meta-analysis of microarray results: challenges, opportunities, and recommendations for standardization.
    Cahan P; Rovegno F; Mooney D; Newman JC; St Laurent G; McCaffrey TA
    Gene; 2007 Oct; 401(1-2):12-8. PubMed ID: 17651921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Combining Affymetrix microarray results.
    Stevens JR; Doerge RW
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Mar; 6():57. PubMed ID: 15774008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comprehensive sensitivity analysis of microarray breast cancer classification under feature variability.
    Sontrop HM; Moerland PD; van den Ham R; Reinders MJ; Verhaegh WF
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2009 Nov; 10():389. PubMed ID: 19941644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Meta-analysis for pathway enrichment analysis when combining multiple genomic studies.
    Shen K; Tseng GC
    Bioinformatics; 2010 May; 26(10):1316-23. PubMed ID: 20410053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Moderated effect size and P-value combinations for microarray meta-analyses.
    Marot G; Foulley JL; Mayer CD; Jaffrézic F
    Bioinformatics; 2009 Oct; 25(20):2692-9. PubMed ID: 19628502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Meta-Analysis in Gene Expression Studies.
    Waldron L; Riester M
    Methods Mol Biol; 2016; 1418():161-76. PubMed ID: 27008014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Asymmetric microarray data produces gene lists highly predictive of research literature on multiple cancer types.
    Dawany NB; Tozeren A
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2010 Sep; 11():483. PubMed ID: 20875095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Integrating biological knowledge with gene expression profiles for survival prediction of cancer.
    Chen X; Wang L
    J Comput Biol; 2009 Feb; 16(2):265-78. PubMed ID: 19183004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Genome-wide functional annotation by integrating multiple microarray datasets using meta-analysis.
    Srivastava GP; Qiu J; Xu D
    Int J Data Min Bioinform; 2010; 4(4):357-76. PubMed ID: 20815137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of meta-analysis methods for detecting differentially expressed genes in microarray experiments.
    Hong F; Breitling R
    Bioinformatics; 2008 Feb; 24(3):374-82. PubMed ID: 18204063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Key issues in conducting a meta-analysis of gene expression microarray datasets.
    Ramasamy A; Mondry A; Holmes CC; Altman DG
    PLoS Med; 2008 Sep; 5(9):e184. PubMed ID: 18767902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.