BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20678731)

  • 1. Multidetector CT dose: clinical practice improvement strategies from a successful optimization program.
    Wallace AB; Goergen SK; Schick D; Soblusky T; Jolley D
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2010 Aug; 7(8):614-24. PubMed ID: 20678731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Knowledge of medical imaging radiation dose and risk among doctors.
    Brown N; Jones L
    J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2013 Feb; 57(1):8-14. PubMed ID: 23374547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Radiation dose management in thoracic CT: an international survey.
    Molinari F; Tack DM; Boiselle P; Ngo L; Mueller-Mang C; Litmanovich D; Bankier AA
    Diagn Interv Radiol; 2013; 19(3):201-9. PubMed ID: 23271505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Computed tomography radiation dose optimization: scanning protocols and clinical applications of automatic exposure control.
    Kalra MK; Naz N; Rizzo SM; Blake MA
    Curr Probl Diagn Radiol; 2005; 34(5):171-81. PubMed ID: 16129235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. ACR practice guideline for the performance and interpretation of cardiac computed tomography (CT).
    Jacobs JE; Boxt LM; Desjardins B; Fishman EK; Larson PA; Schoepf J;
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2006 Sep; 3(9):677-85. PubMed ID: 17412148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Practitioners education on medical exposure justification.
    Avadanei C; Rosca-Fartat G; Stanescu G
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Sep; 147(1-2):346-8. PubMed ID: 21824873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How to introduce clinical practice guidelines.
    Loveday BP; Windsor JA
    N Z Med J; 2008 Jun; 121(1275):7-10. PubMed ID: 18551148
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Will CT ordering practices change if we educate residents about the potential effects of radiation exposure? Experience at a large academic medical center.
    Horowitz JM; Yaghmai V; Miller FH; Russell EJ
    Acad Radiol; 2011 Nov; 18(11):1447-52. PubMed ID: 21889895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Survey of the cosmetic use of lasers and other strong optical radiation sources.
    Christensen T; Nilsen LT
    J Radiol Prot; 2009 Dec; 29(4):491-8. PubMed ID: 19923644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Through the Looking Glass revisited: the need for more meaning and less drama in the reporting of dose and dose reduction in CT.
    Bankier AA; Kressel HY
    Radiology; 2012 Oct; 265(1):4-8. PubMed ID: 22993216
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Current opinions on medical radiation: a survey of oncologists regarding radiation exposure and dose reduction in oncology patients.
    Burke LM; Bashir MR; Neville AM; Nelson RC; Jaffe TA
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2014 May; 11(5):490-5. PubMed ID: 24321221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Radiation safety in abdominal computed tomography.
    Tsapaki V; Rehani M; Saini S
    Semin Ultrasound CT MR; 2010 Feb; 31(1):29-38. PubMed ID: 20102693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Is utilisation of computed tomography justified in clinical practice? Part I: application in the emergency department.
    Sun Z; Ng KH; Vijayananthan A
    Singapore Med J; 2010 Mar; 51(3):200-6. PubMed ID: 20428740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Are nonspecific practice guidelines potentially harmful? A randomized comparison of the effect of nonspecific versus specific guidelines on physician decision making.
    Shekelle PG; Kravitz RL; Beart J; Marger M; Wang M; Lee M
    Health Serv Res; 2000 Mar; 34(7):1429-48. PubMed ID: 10737446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Justification in clinical radiological practice: a survey among staff of five London hospitals.
    Koutalonis M; Horrocks J
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Apr; 149(2):124-37. PubMed ID: 21576178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Is medical radiation exposure a public health concern? The downside to technological advances in computed tomography.
    Weiner SN
    AHIP Cover; 2005; 46(1):52-5. PubMed ID: 15776765
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Standardising practices improves clinical diabetic foot management: the Queensland Diabetic Foot Innovation Project, 2006-09.
    Lazzarini PA; O'Rourke SR; Russell AW; Derhy PH; Kamp MC
    Aust Health Rev; 2012 Feb; 36(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 22513013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Radiation protection in orthopaedics: implications for clinical practice of the new regulations governing roentgen ray irradiation and radioprotection].
    Nestle U; Berlich J
    Orthopade; 2006 May; 35(5):571-82. PubMed ID: 16622706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of physician practice on patient radiation dose during CT guided biopsy procedures.
    Weir VJ; Zhang J; Bruner AP
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2014; 22(3):309-19. PubMed ID: 24865207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Image Gently campaign: working together to change practice.
    Goske MJ; Applegate KE; Boylan J; Butler PF; Callahan MJ; Coley BD; Farley S; Frush DP; Hernanz-Schulman M; Jaramillo D; Johnson ND; Kaste SC; Morrison G; Strauss KJ; Tuggle N
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Feb; 190(2):273-4. PubMed ID: 18212208
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.