These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

80 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20678859)

  • 1. Feasibility of mercury removal from simulated flue gas by activated chars made from poultry manures.
    Klasson KT; Lima IM; Boihem LL; Wartelle LH
    J Environ Manage; 2010 Dec; 91(12):2466-70. PubMed ID: 20678859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Biomass gasification chars for mercury capture from a simulated flue gas of coal combustion.
    Fuente-Cuesta A; Diaz-Somoano M; Lopez-Anton MA; Cieplik M; Fierro JL; Martínez-Tarazona MR
    J Environ Manage; 2012 May; 98():23-8. PubMed ID: 22325640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Adsorbents for capturing mercury in coal-fired boiler flue gas.
    Yang H; Xu Z; Fan M; Bland AE; Judkins RR
    J Hazard Mater; 2007 Jul; 146(1-2):1-11. PubMed ID: 17544578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The performance of iodine on the removal of elemental mercury from the simulated coal-fired flue gas.
    Chi Y; Yan N; Qu Z; Qiao S; Jia J
    J Hazard Mater; 2009 Jul; 166(2-3):776-81. PubMed ID: 19153004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mercury adsorption of modified mulberry twig chars in a simulated flue gas.
    Shu T; Lu P; He N
    Bioresour Technol; 2013 May; 136():182-7. PubMed ID: 23567680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A systematic review on the efficiency of cerium-impregnated activated carbons for the removal of gas-phase, elemental mercury from flue gas.
    Sowlat MH; Kakavandi B; Lotfi S; Yunesian M; Abdollahi M; Rezaei Kalantary R
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2017 May; 24(13):12092-12103. PubMed ID: 28321703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of post-treatment strategies on the properties of activated chars from broiler manure.
    Lima IM; Boykin DL; Thomas Klasson K; Uchimiya M
    Chemosphere; 2014 Jan; 95():96-104. PubMed ID: 24025533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The thief process for mercury removal from flue gas.
    Granite EJ; Freeman MC; Hargis RA; O'Dowd WJ; Pennline HW
    J Environ Manage; 2007 Sep; 84(4):628-34. PubMed ID: 16959396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Removal and recovery of gas-phase element mercury by metal oxide-loaded activated carbon.
    Mei Z; Shen Z; Zhao Q; Wang W; Zhang Y
    J Hazard Mater; 2008 Apr; 152(2):721-9. PubMed ID: 17765397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mercury emissions from coal-fired power stations: The current state of the art in the Netherlands.
    Meij R; te Winkel H
    Sci Total Environ; 2006 Sep; 368(1):393-6. PubMed ID: 16289297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Estimates of increased black carbon emissions from electrostatic precipitators during powdered activated carbon injection for mercury emissions control.
    Clack HL
    Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Jul; 46(13):7327-33. PubMed ID: 22663136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Regenerable sorbents for mercury capture in simulated coal combustion flue gas.
    Rodríguez-Pérez J; López-Antón MA; Díaz-Somoano M; García R; Martínez-Tarazona MR
    J Hazard Mater; 2013 Sep; 260():869-77. PubMed ID: 23876255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Copper and Zn uptake by radish and pakchoi as affected by application of livestock and poultry manures.
    Zhou DM; Hao XZ; Wang YJ; Dong YH; Cang L
    Chemosphere; 2005 Apr; 59(2):167-75. PubMed ID: 15722088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of the activation temperature on the SO2 removal capacity and mechanical performance of pelletized activated chars.
    Rubio B; Izquierdo MT; Mayoral MC; Andrés JM
    Environ Technol; 2001 Sep; 22(9):1081-9. PubMed ID: 11816769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mercury emissions from coal combustion: modeling and comparison of Hg capture in a fabric filter versus an electrostatic precipitator.
    Scala F; Clack HL
    J Hazard Mater; 2008 Apr; 152(2):616-23. PubMed ID: 17703878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of heating time and temperature on the chemical characteristics of biochar from poultry manure.
    Cimò G; Kucerik J; Berns AE; Schaumann GE; Alonzo G; Conte P
    J Agric Food Chem; 2014 Feb; 62(8):1912-8. PubMed ID: 24506474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Using Wet-FGD systems for mercury removal.
    Díaz-Somoano M; Unterberger S; Hein KR
    J Environ Monit; 2005 Sep; 7(9):906-9. PubMed ID: 16121271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bromine chloride as an oxidant to improve elemental mercury removal from coal-fired flue gas.
    Qu Z; Yan N; Liu P; Chi Y; Jia J
    Environ Sci Technol; 2009 Nov; 43(22):8610-5. PubMed ID: 20028060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Poultry litter-based activated carbon for removing heavy metal ions in water.
    Guo M; Qiu G; Song W
    Waste Manag; 2010 Feb; 30(2):308-15. PubMed ID: 19783133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An electrochemical system for removing and recovering elemental mercury from a gas stream.
    Bolger PT; Szlag DC
    Environ Sci Technol; 2002 Oct; 36(20):4430-5. PubMed ID: 12387419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.