These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

66 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20679005)

  • 1. Information tracking approach to segmentation of ultrasound imagery of the prostate.
    Xu RS; Michailovich O; Salama M
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2010 Aug; 57(8):1748-61. PubMed ID: 20679005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prostate segmentation in transrectal ultrasound using magnetic resonance imaging priors.
    Zeng Q; Samei G; Karimi D; Kesch C; Mahdavi SS; Abolmaesumi P; Salcudean SE
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2018 Jun; 13(6):749-757. PubMed ID: 29589259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Rotationally resliced 3D prostate TRUS segmentation using convex optimization with shape priors.
    Qiu W; Yuan J; Ukwatta E; Fenster A
    Med Phys; 2015 Feb; 42(2):877-91. PubMed ID: 25652500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Discrete deformable model guided by partial active shape model for TRUS image segmentation.
    Yan P; Xu S; Turkbey B; Kruecker J
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2010 May; 57(5):1158-66. PubMed ID: 20142158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fisher-Tippett region-merging approach to transrectal ultrasound prostate lesion segmentation.
    Wong A; Scharcanski J
    IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed; 2011 Nov; 15(6):900-7. PubMed ID: 21824854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A regularization technique for closed contour segmentation in ultrasound images.
    Ahn C; Jung Y; Kwon O; Seo J
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2011 Aug; 58(8):1577-89. PubMed ID: 21859577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A survey of prostate segmentation methodologies in ultrasound, magnetic resonance and computed tomography images.
    Ghose S; Oliver A; Martí R; Lladó X; Vilanova JC; Freixenet J; Mitra J; Sidibé D; Meriaudeau F
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2012 Oct; 108(1):262-87. PubMed ID: 22739209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prostate Volume Segmentation in TRUS Using Hybrid Edge-Bhattacharyya Active Surfaces.
    Jaouen V; Bert J; Mountris KA; Boussion N; Schick U; Pradier O; Valeri A; Visvikis D
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2019 Apr; 66(4):920-933. PubMed ID: 30113888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A random walk-based segmentation framework for 3D ultrasound images of the prostate.
    Ma L; Guo R; Tian Z; Fei B
    Med Phys; 2017 Oct; 44(10):5128-5142. PubMed ID: 28582803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Robust Prostate Segmentation Using Intrinsic Properties of TRUS Images.
    Wu P; Liu Y; Li Y; Liu B
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2015 Jun; 34(6):1321-35. PubMed ID: 25576565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Deformable segmentation of 3-D ultrasound prostate images using statistical texture matching method.
    Zhan Y; Shen D
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2006 Mar; 25(3):256-72. PubMed ID: 16524083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Segmentation of prostate boundaries from ultrasound images using statistical shape model.
    Shen D; Zhan Y; Davatzikos C
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2003 Apr; 22(4):539-51. PubMed ID: 12774900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Statistical shape and texture model of quadrature phase information for prostate segmentation.
    Ghose S; Oliver A; Martí R; Lladó X; Freixenet J; Mitra J; Vilanova JC; Comet-Batlle J; Meriaudeau F
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2012 Jan; 7(1):43-55. PubMed ID: 21629983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Adaptively learning local shape statistics for prostate segmentation in ultrasound.
    Yan P; Xu S; Turkbey B; Kruecker J
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2011 Mar; 58(3):633-41. PubMed ID: 21097373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The accuracy of transrectal ultrasound prostate volume estimation: clinical correlations.
    Matthews GJ; Motta J; Fracehia JA
    J Clin Ultrasound; 1996; 24(9):501-5. PubMed ID: 8906481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. 3D prostate model formation from non-parallel 2D ultrasound biopsy images.
    Cool D; Downey D; Izawa J; Chin J; Fenster A
    Med Image Anal; 2006 Dec; 10(6):875-87. PubMed ID: 17097333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Deep Attentive Features for Prostate Segmentation in 3D Transrectal Ultrasound.
    Wang Y; Dou H; Hu X; Zhu L; Yang X; Xu M; Qin J; Heng PA; Wang T; Ni D
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2019 Dec; 38(12):2768-2778. PubMed ID: 31021793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Boundary delineation in transrectal ultrasound image for prostate cancer.
    Zhang Y; Sankar R; Qian W
    Comput Biol Med; 2007 Nov; 37(11):1591-9. PubMed ID: 17466966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Segmentation of the prostate ultrasound image based on an improved geodesic active contour model].
    Yang ZS; Li CF; Zhou KY; Zhang KH; He L
    Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 2008 Sep; 32(5):316-8, 358. PubMed ID: 19119647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Online Robust Projective Dictionary Learning: Shape Modeling for MR-TRUS Registration.
    Wang Y; Zheng Q; Heng PA
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2018 Apr; 37(4):1067-1078. PubMed ID: 29610082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.