BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

268 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20679695)

  • 1. A model-constrained Monte Carlo method for blind arterial input function estimation in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: II. In vivo results.
    Schabel MC; DiBella EV; Jensen RL; Salzman KL
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Aug; 55(16):4807-23. PubMed ID: 20679695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A model-constrained Monte Carlo method for blind arterial input function estimation in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: I. Simulations.
    Schabel MC; Fluckiger JU; DiBella EV
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Aug; 55(16):4783-806. PubMed ID: 20679691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Repeatability of arterial input functions and kinetic parameters in muscle obtained by dynamic contrast enhanced MR imaging of the head and neck.
    Koopman T; Martens RM; Lavini C; Yaqub M; Castelijns JA; Boellaard R; Marcus JT
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 May; 68():1-8. PubMed ID: 31978517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of repeatability and treatment response in early phase clinical trials using DCE-MRI: comparison of parametric analysis using MR- and CT-derived arterial input functions.
    Rata M; Collins DJ; Darcy J; Messiou C; Tunariu N; Desouza N; Young H; Leach MO; Orton MR
    Eur Radiol; 2016 Jul; 26(7):1991-8. PubMed ID: 26385804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A novel AIF tracking method and comparison of DCE-MRI parameters using individual and population-based AIFs in human breast cancer.
    Li X; Welch EB; Arlinghaus LR; Chakravarthy AB; Xu L; Farley J; Loveless ME; Mayer IA; Kelley MC; Meszoely IM; Means-Powell JA; Abramson VG; Grau AM; Gore JC; Yankeelov TE
    Phys Med Biol; 2011 Sep; 56(17):5753-69. PubMed ID: 21841212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of two methods for estimating DCE-MRI parameters via individual and cohort based AIFs in prostate cancer: a step towards practical implementation.
    Fedorov A; Fluckiger J; Ayers GD; Li X; Gupta SN; Tempany C; Mulkern R; Yankeelov TE; Fennessy FM
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 May; 32(4):321-9. PubMed ID: 24560287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Improved reliability of perfusion estimation in dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI by using the arterial input function from dynamic contrast enhanced MRI.
    Tseng CH; Jaspers J; Romero AM; Wielopolski P; Smits M; van Osch MJP; Vos F
    NMR Biomed; 2024 Jan; 37(1):e5038. PubMed ID: 37712359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI parametric mapping using high spatiotemporal resolution Golden-angle RAdial Sparse Parallel MRI and iterative joint estimation of the arterial input function and pharmacokinetic parameters.
    Mazaheri Y; Kim N; Lakhman Y; Jafari R; Vargas A; Otazo R
    NMR Biomed; 2022 Jul; 35(7):e4718. PubMed ID: 35226774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Operator dependency of arterial input function in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.
    Kleppestø M; Bjørnerud A; Groote IR; Kim M; Vardal J; Larsson C
    MAGMA; 2022 Feb; 35(1):105-112. PubMed ID: 34213687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Arterial input function calculation in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: an in vivo validation study using co-registered contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging.
    Mehrabian H; Chandrana C; Pang I; Chopra R; Martel AL
    Eur Radiol; 2012 Aug; 22(8):1735-47. PubMed ID: 22752523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of DCE-MRI parameters for brain tumors through implementation of physiologically-based pharmacokinetic model approaches for Gd-DOTA.
    Spanakis M; Kontopodis E; Van Cauter S; Sakkalis V; Marias K
    J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2016 Oct; 43(5):529-47. PubMed ID: 27647272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of the effect of haematocrit-dependent arterial input functions on the accuracy of pharmacokinetic parameters in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.
    Just N; Koh DM; D'Arcy J; Collins DJ; Leach MO
    NMR Biomed; 2011 Aug; 24(7):902-15. PubMed ID: 21290457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of artery input function on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for determining grades of gliomas.
    Jia L; Wu X; Wan Q; Wan L; Jia W; Zhang N
    Br J Radiol; 2021 Mar; 94(1119):20200699. PubMed ID: 33332981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Impact of Arterial Input Function Determination Variations on Prostate Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Pharmacokinetic Modeling: A Multicenter Data Analysis Challenge.
    Huang W; Chen Y; Fedorov A; Li X; Jajamovich GH; Malyarenko DI; Aryal MP; LaViolette PS; Oborski MJ; O'Sullivan F; Abramson RG; Jafari-Khouzani K; Afzal A; Tudorica A; Moloney B; Gupta SN; Besa C; Kalpathy-Cramer J; Mountz JM; Laymon CM; Muzi M; Schmainda K; Cao Y; Chenevert TL; Taouli B; Yankeelov TE; Fennessy F; Li X
    Tomography; 2016 Mar; 2(1):56-66. PubMed ID: 27200418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Estimating the arterial input function from dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI data with compensation for flow enhancement (II): Applications in spine diagnostics and assessment of crohn's disease.
    van Schie JJN; Lavini C; van Vliet LJ; Kramer G; Pieters-van den Bos I; Marcus JT; Stoker J; Vos FM
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 May; 47(5):1197-1204. PubMed ID: 29193469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Model-based blind estimation of kinetic parameters in dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE)-MRI.
    Fluckiger JU; Schabel MC; Dibella EV
    Magn Reson Med; 2009 Dec; 62(6):1477-86. PubMed ID: 19859949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison between population average and experimentally measured arterial input function in predicting biopsy results in prostate cancer.
    Meng R; Chang SD; Jones EC; Goldenberg SL; Kozlowski P
    Acad Radiol; 2010 Apr; 17(4):520-5. PubMed ID: 20074982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Blind estimation of the arterial input function in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI using purity maximization.
    Lin YC; Chan TH; Chi CY; Ng SH; Liu HL; Wei KC; Wai YY; Wang CC; Wang JJ
    Magn Reson Med; 2012 Nov; 68(5):1439-49. PubMed ID: 22383386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pharmacokinetic modeling of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI using a reference region and input function tail.
    Ahmed Z; Levesque IR
    Magn Reson Med; 2020 Jan; 83(1):286-298. PubMed ID: 31393033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A method for patient dose reduction in dynamic contrast enhanced CT study.
    Kim SM; Haider MA; Milosevic M; Jaffray DA; Yeung IW
    Med Phys; 2011 Sep; 38(9):5094-103. PubMed ID: 21978055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.