181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20681517)
1. Alternative experimental design with an applied normalization scheme can improve statistical power in 2D-DIGE experiments.
Engelen K; Sifrim A; Van de Plas B; Laukens K; Arckens L; Marchal K
J Proteome Res; 2010 Oct; 9(10):4919-26. PubMed ID: 20681517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A novel experimental design for comparative two-dimensional gel analysis: two-dimensional difference gel electrophoresis incorporating a pooled internal standard.
Alban A; David SO; Bjorkesten L; Andersson C; Sloge E; Lewis S; Currie I
Proteomics; 2003 Jan; 3(1):36-44. PubMed ID: 12548632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Capabilities using 2-D DIGE in proteomics research : the new gold standard for 2-D gel electrophoresis.
Rozanas CR; Loyland SM
Methods Mol Biol; 2008; 441():1-18. PubMed ID: 18370308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Application of 2D-DIGE in cancer proteomics toward personalized medicine.
Kondo T; Hirohashi S
Methods Mol Biol; 2009; 577():135-54. PubMed ID: 19718514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. All about DIGE: quantification technology for differential-display 2D-gel proteomics.
Lilley KS; Friedman DB
Expert Rev Proteomics; 2004 Dec; 1(4):401-9. PubMed ID: 15966837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quantitative proteomics for two-dimensional gels using difference gel electrophoresis.
Friedman DB
Methods Mol Biol; 2007; 367():219-39. PubMed ID: 17185779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Analysis of DIGE data using a linear mixed model allowing for protein-specific dye effects.
Krogh M; Liu Y; Waldemarson S; Valastro B; James P
Proteomics; 2007 Dec; 7(23):4235-44. PubMed ID: 17979174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Automated image alignment for 2D gel electrophoresis in a high-throughput proteomics pipeline.
Dowsey AW; Dunn MJ; Yang GZ
Bioinformatics; 2008 Apr; 24(7):950-7. PubMed ID: 18310057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Maximising sensitivity for detecting changes in protein expression: experimental design using minimal CyDyes.
Karp NA; Lilley KS
Proteomics; 2005 Aug; 5(12):3105-15. PubMed ID: 16035117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Data variance and statistical significance in 2D-gel electrophoresis and DIGE experiments: comparison of the effects of normalization methods.
Keeping AJ; Collins RA
J Proteome Res; 2011 Mar; 10(3):1353-60. PubMed ID: 21171621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Difference gel electrophoresis based on lys/cys tagging.
Westermeier R; Scheibe B
Methods Mol Biol; 2008; 424():73-85. PubMed ID: 18369854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of three commercially available DIGE analysis software packages: minimal user intervention in gel-based proteomics.
Kang Y; Techanukul T; Mantalaris A; Nagy JM
J Proteome Res; 2009 Feb; 8(2):1077-84. PubMed ID: 19133722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Statistical analysis of the experimental variation in the proteomic characterization of human plasma by two-dimensional difference gel electrophoresis.
Corzett TH; Fodor IK; Choi MW; Walsworth VL; Chromy BA; Turteltaub KW; McCutchen-Maloney SL
J Proteome Res; 2006 Oct; 5(10):2611-9. PubMed ID: 17022632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Two-dimensional difference gel electrophoresis.
Viswanathan S; Unlü M; Minden JS
Nat Protoc; 2006; 1(3):1351-8. PubMed ID: 17406422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Optimizing the difference gel electrophoresis (DIGE) technology.
Friedman DB; Lilley KS
Methods Mol Biol; 2008; 428():93-124. PubMed ID: 18287770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The use of difference in-gel electrophoresis for quantitation of protein expression.
Sapra R
Methods Mol Biol; 2009; 492():93-112. PubMed ID: 19241028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quantitative detection of phosphoproteins by combination of two-dimensional difference gel electrophoresis and phosphospecific fluorescent staining.
Stasyk T; Morandell S; Bakry R; Feuerstein I; Huck CW; Stecher G; Bonn GK; Huber LA
Electrophoresis; 2005 Jul; 26(14):2850-4. PubMed ID: 15966015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. 2D DIGE saturation labeling for minute sample amounts.
Arnold GJ; Fröhlich T
Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 854():89-112. PubMed ID: 22311755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Identification of fibrosis-relevant proteins using DIGE (difference in gel electrophoresis) in different models of hepatic fibrosis.
Henkel C; Roderfeld M; Weiskirchen R; Scheibe B; Matern S; Roeb E
Z Gastroenterol; 2005 Jan; 43(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 15650968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Technical strategies to reduce the amount of "false significant" results in quantitative proteomics.
Fuxius S; Eravci M; Broedel O; Weist S; Mansmann U; Eravci S; Baumgartner A
Proteomics; 2008 May; 8(9):1780-4. PubMed ID: 18398880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
