BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20681963)

  • 1. Experimental study of bite mark injuries by digital analysis.
    Santoro V; Lozito P; De Donno A; Introna F
    J Forensic Sci; 2011 Jan; 56(1):224-8. PubMed ID: 20681963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quantitative forensic evaluation of bite marks with the aid of a shape analysis computer program: Part 2; "SCIP" and bite marks in skin and foodstuffs.
    Nambiar P; Bridges TE; Brown KA
    J Forensic Odontostomatol; 1995 Dec; 13(2):26-32. PubMed ID: 9227071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bite mark analysis and comparison using image perception technology.
    van der Velden A; Spiessens M; Willems G
    J Forensic Odontostomatol; 2006 Jun; 24(1):14-7. PubMed ID: 16783951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quantitative forensic evaluation of bite marks with the aid of a shape analysis computer program: Part 1; The development of "SCIP" and the similarity index.
    Nambiar P; Bridges TE; Brown KA
    J Forensic Odontostomatol; 1995 Dec; 13(2):18-25. PubMed ID: 9227070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy of bite mark overlays: a comparison of five common methods to produce exemplars from a suspect's dentition.
    Sweet D; Bowers CM
    J Forensic Sci; 1998 Mar; 43(2):362-7. PubMed ID: 9544542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Analysis of bite marks].
    Spiessens M; Van der Velden B; Willems G
    Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 2005; 60(3):203-19. PubMed ID: 16370436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Error rates in bite mark analysis in an in vivo animal model.
    Avon SL; Victor C; Mayhall JT; Wood RE
    Forensic Sci Int; 2010 Sep; 201(1-3):45-55. PubMed ID: 20457498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A framework for estimating probability of a match in forensic bite mark identification.
    Tuceryan M; Li F; Blitzer HL; Parks ET; Platt JA
    J Forensic Sci; 2011 Jan; 56 Suppl 1():S83-9. PubMed ID: 20887354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison between direct and indirect methods available for human bite mark analysis.
    Kouble RF; Craig GT
    J Forensic Sci; 2004 Jan; 49(1):111-8. PubMed ID: 14979355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Photographic evidence protocol: the use of digital imaging methods to rectify angular distortion and create life size reproductions of bite mark evidence.
    Bowers CM; Johansen RJ
    J Forensic Sci; 2002 Jan; 47(1):178-85. PubMed ID: 12064648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An integrated technique for the analysis of skin bite marks.
    Bernitz H; Owen JH; van Heerden WF; Solheim T
    J Forensic Sci; 2008 Jan; 53(1):194-8. PubMed ID: 18279256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Uniqueness of the dentition as impressed in human skin: a cadaver model.
    Miller RG; Bush PJ; Dorion RB; Bush MA
    J Forensic Sci; 2009 Jul; 54(4):909-14. PubMed ID: 19486245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [An experimental study on human bitemarks digital analysis and its accuracy].
    Wu Y; Chen X; Sun D
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2005 Oct; 22(5):918-21. PubMed ID: 16294721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Comparison of bite marks and teeth features using 2D and 3D methods].
    Lorkiewicz-Muszyńska D; Glapiński M; Zaba C; Łabecka M
    Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2011; 61(2):107-14. PubMed ID: 22390125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Photography in bite mark and patterned injury documentation--Part 2: A case study.
    Wright FD
    J Forensic Sci; 1998 Jul; 43(4):881-7. PubMed ID: 9670513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Porcine skin as an in-vivo model for ageing of human bite marks.
    Avon SL; Wood RE
    J Forensic Odontostomatol; 2005 Dec; 23(2):30-9. PubMed ID: 16353753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Computer-based production of bite mark comparison overlays.
    Sweet D; Parhar M; Wood RE
    J Forensic Sci; 1998 Sep; 43(5):1050-5. PubMed ID: 9729824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effectiveness of comparison overlays generated with DentalPrint software in bite mark analysis.
    Martin-de las Heras S; Valenzuela A; Javier Valverde A; Torres JC; Luna-del-Castillo JD
    J Forensic Sci; 2007 Jan; 52(1):151-6. PubMed ID: 17209928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Human bite marks in forensic dentistry.
    Wright FD; Dailey JC
    Dent Clin North Am; 2001 Apr; 45(2):365-97. PubMed ID: 11370460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of simulated human dermal bitemarks possessing three-dimensional attributes to suspected biters using a proprietary three-dimensional comparison.
    Martin-de-las-Heras S; Tafur D
    Forensic Sci Int; 2009 Sep; 190(1-3):33-7. PubMed ID: 19505780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.