175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20682592)
1. Correlation between mammographic and sonographic findings and prognostic factors in patients with node-negative invasive breast cancer.
Shin HJ; Kim HH; Huh MO; Kim MJ; Yi A; Kim H; Son BH; Ahn SH
Br J Radiol; 2011 Jan; 84(997):19-30. PubMed ID: 20682592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mammographic finding as predictor of survival in 1-9 mm invasive breast cancers. worse prognosis for cases presenting as calcifications alone.
Thurfjell E; Thurfjell MG; Lindgren A
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2001 May; 67(2):177-80. PubMed ID: 11519866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mammographic appearance of nonpalpable breast cancer reflects pathologic characteristics.
Gajdos C; Tartter PI; Bleiweiss IJ; Hermann G; de Csepel J; Estabrook A; Rademaker AW
Ann Surg; 2002 Feb; 235(2):246-51. PubMed ID: 11807365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Correlation of mammographic calcifications with Her-2/neu overexpression in primary breast carcinomas.
Wang X; Chao L; Chen L; Tian B; Ma G; Zang Y; Hua M; Sun J
J Digit Imaging; 2008 Jun; 21(2):170-6. PubMed ID: 18256879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mammographic, sonographic and MR imaging features of invasive micropapillary breast cancer.
Alsharif S; Daghistani R; Kamberoğlu EA; Omeroglu A; Meterissian S; Mesurolle B
Eur J Radiol; 2014 Aug; 83(8):1375-80. PubMed ID: 24913934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Aspects in mammographic screening. Detection, prediction, recurrence and prognosis.
Thurfjell MG
Acta Radiol Suppl; 2001 Dec; 42(424):1-22. PubMed ID: 12040855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mammographic features of calcifications in DCIS: correlation with oestrogen receptor and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status.
Bae MS; Moon WK; Chang JM; Cho N; Park SY; Won JK; Jeon YK; Moon HG; Han W; Park IA
Eur Radiol; 2013 Aug; 23(8):2072-8. PubMed ID: 23512196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mammographic tumor features can predict long-term outcomes reliably in women with 1-14-mm invasive breast carcinoma.
Tabar L; Tony Chen HH; Amy Yen MF; Tot T; Tung TH; Chen LS; Chiu YH; Duffy SW; Smith RA
Cancer; 2004 Oct; 101(8):1745-59. PubMed ID: 15386334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mammographic features of pure mucinous carcinoma of the breast with pathological correlation.
Goodman DN; Boutross-Tadross O; Jong RA
Can Assoc Radiol J; 1995 Aug; 46(4):296-301. PubMed ID: 7543806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Can mammographic and sonographic imaging features predict the Oncotype DX™ recurrence score in T1 and T2, hormone receptor positive, HER2 negative and axillary lymph node negative breast cancers?
Yepes MM; Romilly AP; Collado-Mesa F; Net JM; Kiszonas R; Arheart KL; Young D; Glück S
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2014 Nov; 148(1):117-23. PubMed ID: 25262341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Correlation of HER-2/neu overexpression with mammography and age distribution in primary breast carcinomas.
Seo BK; Pisano ED; Kuzimak CM; Koomen M; Pavic D; Lee Y; Cole EB; Lee J
Acad Radiol; 2006 Oct; 13(10):1211-8. PubMed ID: 16979070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Extensive intraductal components of invasive ductal breast carcinoma--value of mammography].
Mallek R; Mostbeck GH; Lösch A; Kainz C; Baldt M; Czerwenka K; Fitzal P; Wolf G
Rofo; 1994 Feb; 160(2):164-7. PubMed ID: 8312515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Tubular carcinoma of the breast: mammographic and sonographic features.
Sheppard DG; Whitman GJ; Huynh PT; Sahin AA; Fornage BD; Stelling CB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Jan; 174(1):253-7. PubMed ID: 10628489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. HER2-positive breast cancer patients: correlation between mammographic and pathological findings.
Radenkovic S; Konjevic G; Isakovic A; Stevanovic P; Gopcevic K; Jurisic V
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2014 Nov; 162(1-2):125-8. PubMed ID: 25063784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mammographic casting-type calcification is an independent prognostic factor in invasive breast cancer.
Li Y; Cao J; Zhou Y; Mao F; Shen S; Sun Q
Sci Rep; 2019 Jul; 9(1):10544. PubMed ID: 31332233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Accuracy of Mammography, Ultrasound, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging For the Measurement of Invasive Breast Cancer With Extensive Intraductal Components.
Kim YE; Cha JH; Kim HH; Shin HJ; Chae EY; Choi WJ
Clin Breast Cancer; 2023 Jan; 23(1):45-53. PubMed ID: 36328930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Primary breast carcinoma: association of mammographic calcifications with osteopontin expression.
Wang X; Chao L; Ma G; Chen L; Jin G; Hua M; Liu H; Ouyang A; Zhang X
Radiology; 2010 Jan; 254(1):69-78. PubMed ID: 20019131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of ER, PR and HER-2/neu (C-erb B 2) reactivity pattern with histologic grade, tumor size and lymph node status in breast cancer.
Azizun-Nisa ; Bhurgri Y; Raza F; Kayani N
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2008; 9(4):553-6. PubMed ID: 19256737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast: mammographic and sonographic evaluation.
Albayrak ZK; Onay HK; Karatağ GY; Karatağ O
Diagn Interv Radiol; 2011 Sep; 17(3):232-8. PubMed ID: 20706979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pregnancy- and lactation-associated breast cancer: mammographic and sonographic findings.
Ahn BY; Kim HH; Moon WK; Pisano ED; Kim HS; Cha ES; Kim JS; Oh KK; Park SH
J Ultrasound Med; 2003 May; 22(5):491-7; quiz 498-9. PubMed ID: 12751860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
