BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20683263)

  • 1. Newer diagnostic approaches to intestinal protozoa.
    van Lieshout L; Verweij JJ
    Curr Opin Infect Dis; 2010 Oct; 23(5):488-93. PubMed ID: 20683263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Use of "Parasep filter fecal concentrator tubes" for the detection of intestinal parasites in stool samples under routine conditions.
    Zeeshan M; Zafar A; Saeed Z; Irfan S; Sobani ZA; Shakoor S; Beg MA
    Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2011; 54(1):121-3. PubMed ID: 21393892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of different methods of detection of enteric pathogenic protozoa.
    Ahmed NH; Chowdhary A
    Indian J Med Microbiol; 2013; 31(2):154-60. PubMed ID: 23867672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Detection of diarrhoea-causing protozoa in general practice patients in The Netherlands by multiplex real-time PCR.
    ten Hove R; Schuurman T; Kooistra M; Möller L; van Lieshout L; Verweij JJ
    Clin Microbiol Infect; 2007 Oct; 13(10):1001-7. PubMed ID: 17714523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison between spontaneous sedimentation method and Paratest® for the diagnosis of intestinal parasitic infections.
    Brandelli CL; Cargnin ST; Willers DM; Oliveira KR; Tasca T
    Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg; 2011 Oct; 105(10):604-6. PubMed ID: 21742360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical consequences of new diagnostic tools for intestinal parasites.
    van Lieshout L; Roestenberg M
    Clin Microbiol Infect; 2015 Jun; 21(6):520-8. PubMed ID: 25843505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Triple Faeces Test: an effective tool for detection of intestinal parasites in routine clinical practice.
    van Gool T; Weijts R; Lommerse E; Mank TG
    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 2003 May; 22(5):284-90. PubMed ID: 12736794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Traditional and innovative diagnostic tools: when and why they should be applied].
    Cancrini G; Iori A
    Parassitologia; 2004 Jun; 46(1-2):173-6. PubMed ID: 15305711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Molecular diagnosis in clinical parasitology: when and why?
    Wong SS; Fung KS; Chau S; Poon RW; Wong SC; Yuen KY
    Exp Biol Med (Maywood); 2014 Nov; 239(11):1443-60. PubMed ID: 24668556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Parasites detected from diarrheal stool samples collected in Nepal.
    Uga S; Rai SK; Kimura K; Ganesh R; Kimura D; Wakasugi M; Miyake Y; Ishiyama S; Rajbhandari TP
    Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health; 2004 Mar; 35(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 15272739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical and Analytical Evaluation of a Single-Vial Stool Collection Device with Formalin-Free Fixative for Improved Processing and Comprehensive Detection of Gastrointestinal Parasites.
    Couturier BA; Jensen R; Arias N; Heffron M; Gubler E; Case K; Gowans J; Couturier MR
    J Clin Microbiol; 2015 Aug; 53(8):2539-48. PubMed ID: 26019199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mini-FLOTAC, an innovative direct diagnostic technique for intestinal parasitic infections: experience from the field.
    Barda BD; Rinaldi L; Ianniello D; Zepherine H; Salvo F; Sadutshang T; Cringoli G; Clementi M; Albonico M
    PLoS Negl Trop Dis; 2013; 7(8):e2344. PubMed ID: 23936577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Emerging intestinal protozoa: a diagnostic dilemma.
    Collins PA; Wright MS
    Clin Lab Sci; 1997; 10(5):273-8. PubMed ID: 10177205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of microscopy and PCR for detection of intestinal parasites in Danish patients supports an incentive for molecular screening platforms.
    Stensvold CR; Nielsen HV
    J Clin Microbiol; 2012 Feb; 50(2):540-1. PubMed ID: 22090410
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Parasitological diagnosis combining an internally controlled real-time PCR assay for the detection of four protozoa in stool samples with a testing algorithm for microscopy.
    Bruijnesteijn van Coppenraet LE; Wallinga JA; Ruijs GJ; Bruins MJ; Verweij JJ
    Clin Microbiol Infect; 2009 Sep; 15(9):869-74. PubMed ID: 19624500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The need for three stool specimens in routine laboratory examinations for intestinal parasites.
    Nazer H; Greer W; Donnelly K; Mohamed AE; Yaish H; Kagalwalla A; Pavillard R
    Br J Clin Pract; 1993; 47(2):76-8. PubMed ID: 8334067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Easyscreen™ Enteric Protozoa Assay For the Detection of Intestinal Parasites: A Retrospective Bi-Center Study.
    Dirani G; Zannoli S; Paesini E; Farabegoli P; Dalmo B; Vocale C; Liguori G; Varani S; Sambri V
    J Parasitol; 2019 Feb; 105(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 30807725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Problems and limitations of conventional and innovative methods for the diagnosis of Toxoplasmosis in humans and animals].
    Piergili Fioretti D
    Parassitologia; 2004 Jun; 46(1-2):177-81. PubMed ID: 15305712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Routine use of point-of-care tests: usefulness and application in clinical microbiology.
    Clerc O; Greub G
    Clin Microbiol Infect; 2010 Aug; 16(8):1054-61. PubMed ID: 20670287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Application of PCR-based methods for diagnosis of intestinal parasitic infections in the clinical laboratory.
    Verweij JJ
    Parasitology; 2014 Dec; 141(14):1863-72. PubMed ID: 24780241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.