These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

320 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20683285)

  • 1. Dental imaging in implant treatment planning.
    Chan HL; Misch K; Wang HL
    Implant Dent; 2010 Aug; 19(4):288-98. PubMed ID: 20683285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Radiologic techniques using CBCT and 3-D treatment planning for implant placement.
    Peck JN; Conte GJ
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 2008 Apr; 36(4):287-90, 292-4, 296-7. PubMed ID: 18481625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cone beam CT for pre-surgical assessment of implant sites.
    Hatcher DC; Dial C; Mayorga C
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 2003 Nov; 31(11):825-33. PubMed ID: 14696834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Implant planning and placement using optical scanning and cone beam CT technology.
    van der Zel JM
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Aug; 17(6):476-81. PubMed ID: 18482361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Restoratively driven implant dentistry utilizing advanced software and CBCT: realistic abutments and virtual teeth.
    Ganz SD
    Dent Today; 2008 Jul; 27(7):122, 124, 126-7. PubMed ID: 18686668
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cone beam computed tomography radiation dose and image quality assessments.
    Lofthag-Hansen S
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 2010; (209):4-55. PubMed ID: 21229915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An open system approach for surgical guide production.
    Abboud M; Orentlicher G
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Dec; 69(12):e519-24. PubMed ID: 22117708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reliability of implant placement with stereolithographic surgical guides generated from computed tomography: clinical data from 94 implants.
    Ersoy AE; Turkyilmaz I; Ozan O; McGlumphy EA
    J Periodontol; 2008 Aug; 79(8):1339-45. PubMed ID: 18672982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dental cone beam computed tomography: justification for use in planning oral implant placement.
    Jacobs R; Quirynen M
    Periodontol 2000; 2014 Oct; 66(1):203-13. PubMed ID: 25123769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing applications using CT and cone beam CT scanning technology.
    Ganz SD
    Dent Clin North Am; 2008 Oct; 52(4):777-808, vii. PubMed ID: 18805229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Digital design of a surgical guide for placement of definitive implants before orthodontic treatment.
    Bayraktaroglu HC; Kim JS; Londono J; Baker PS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Aug; 114(2):174-7. PubMed ID: 25935081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The combination of digital surface scanners and cone beam computed tomography technology for guided implant surgery using 3Shape implant studio software: a case history report.
    Lanis A; Álvarez Del Canto O
    Int J Prosthodont; 2015; 28(2):169-78. PubMed ID: 25822304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cone beam computed tomography-assisted treatment planning concepts.
    Ganz SD
    Dent Clin North Am; 2011 Jul; 55(3):515-36, viii. PubMed ID: 21726687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dental implant imaging: TeraRecon's Dental 3D Cone Beam Computed Tomography System.
    Garg AK
    Dent Implantol Update; 2007 Jun; 18(6):41-5. PubMed ID: 17682685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Use of cone beam computed tomography and a laser intraoral scanner in virtual dental implant surgery: part 1.
    Lee CY; Ganz SD; Wong N; Suzuki JB
    Implant Dent; 2012 Aug; 21(4):265-71. PubMed ID: 22814549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Incorporating digital scans of diagnostic casts into computed tomography for virtual implant treatment planning.
    Yilmaz B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Aug; 114(2):178-81. PubMed ID: 25935078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Defining new paradigms for assessment of implant receptor sites. The use of CT/CBCT and interactive virtual treatment planning for congenitally missing lateral incisors.
    Ganz SD
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2008 Jun; 29(5):256-8, 260-2, 264-7; quiz 268, 278. PubMed ID: 18795643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Presurgical implant-site assessment and restoratively driven digital planning.
    Scherer MD
    Dent Clin North Am; 2014 Jul; 58(3):561-95. PubMed ID: 24993924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy of the match between cone beam computed tomography and model scan data in template-guided implant planning: A prospective controlled clinical study.
    Schnutenhaus S; Gröller S; Luthardt RG; Rudolph H
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2018 Aug; 20(4):541-549. PubMed ID: 29691987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of the difference in accuracy between implant placement by virtual planning data and surgical guide templates versus the conventional free-hand method - a combined in vivo - in vitro technique using cone-beam CT (Part II).
    Nickenig HJ; Wichmann M; Hamel J; Schlegel KA; Eitner S
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2010 Oct; 38(7):488-93. PubMed ID: 19939691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.