322 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20683388)
1. Mechanical function of vertebral body osteophytes, as revealed by experiments on cadaveric spines.
Al-Rawahi M; Luo J; Pollintine P; Dolan P; Adams MA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 May; 36(10):770-7. PubMed ID: 20683388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Is kyphoplasty better than vertebroplasty in restoring normal mechanical function to an injured spine?
Luo J; Bertram W; Sangar D; Adams MA; Annesley-Williams DJ; Dolan P
Bone; 2010 Apr; 46(4):1050-7. PubMed ID: 20004264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Strength of the cervical spine in compression and bending.
Przybyla AS; Skrzypiec D; Pollintine P; Dolan P; Adams MA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Jul; 32(15):1612-20. PubMed ID: 17621208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Vertebroplasty: only small cement volumes are required to normalize stress distributions on the vertebral bodies.
Luo J; Daines L; Charalambous A; Adams MA; Annesley-Williams DJ; Dolan P
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Dec; 34(26):2865-73. PubMed ID: 20010394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effects of creep and recovery on the in vitro biomechanical characteristics of human multi-level thoracolumbar spinal segments.
Busscher I; van Dieën JH; van der Veen AJ; Kingma I; Meijer GJ; Verkerke GJ; Veldhuizen AG
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2011 Jun; 26(5):438-44. PubMed ID: 21251737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical characteristics of different regions of the human spine: an in vitro study on multilevel spinal segments.
Busscher I; van Dieën JH; Kingma I; van der Veen AJ; Verkerke GJ; Veldhuizen AG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Dec; 34(26):2858-64. PubMed ID: 20010393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mechanical efficacy of vertebroplasty: influence of cement type, BMD, fracture severity, and disc degeneration.
Luo J; Skrzypiec DM; Pollintine P; Adams MA; Annesley-Williams DJ; Dolan P
Bone; 2007 Apr; 40(4):1110-9. PubMed ID: 17229596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Two in vivo surgical approaches for lumbar corpectomy using allograft and a metallic implant: a controlled clinical and biomechanical study.
Huang P; Gupta MC; Sarigul-Klijn N; Hazelwood S
Spine J; 2006; 6(6):648-58. PubMed ID: 17088195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomechanical evaluation of a dynamic pedicle screw fixation device.
Xu HZ; Wang XY; Chi YL; Zhu QA; Lin Y; Huang QS; Dai LY
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 May; 21(4):330-6. PubMed ID: 16434133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomechanical effect of constraint in lumbar total disc replacement: a study with finite element analysis.
Chung SK; Kim YE; Wang KC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 May; 34(12):1281-6. PubMed ID: 19455003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Response of Charité total disc replacement under physiologic loads: prosthesis component motion patterns.
O'Leary P; Nicolakis M; Lorenz MA; Voronov LI; Zindrick MR; Ghanayem A; Havey RM; Carandang G; Sartori M; Gaitanis IN; Fronczak S; Patwardhan AG
Spine J; 2005; 5(6):590-9. PubMed ID: 16291097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. When are intervertebral discs stronger than their adjacent vertebrae?
Skrzypiec D; Tarala M; Pollintine P; Dolan P; Adams MA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Oct; 32(22):2455-61. PubMed ID: 18090085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Preclinical testing of a wedge-rod system for fusionless correction of scoliosis.
Betz RR; Cunningham B; Selgrath C; Drewry T; Sherman MC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):S275-8. PubMed ID: 14560203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of vertebral body percentage fill on mechanical behavior during percutaneous vertebroplasty.
Molloy S; Mathis JM; Belkoff SM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Jul; 28(14):1549-54. PubMed ID: 12865843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biomechanical changes after the augmentation of experimental osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures in the cadaveric thoracic spine.
Kayanja MM; Togawa D; Lieberman IH
Spine J; 2005; 5(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 15653085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Direction of the formation of anterior lumbar vertebral osteophytes.
Kasai Y; Kawakita E; Sakakibara T; Akeda K; Uchida A
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2009 Jan; 10():4. PubMed ID: 19144120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomechanical evaluation of a new total posterior-element replacement system.
Wilke HJ; Schmidt H; Werner K; Schmölz W; Drumm J
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Nov; 31(24):2790-6; discussion 2797. PubMed ID: 17108830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influences of disc degeneration and bone mineral density on the structural properties of lumbar end plates.
Hou Y; Yuan W
Spine J; 2012 Mar; 12(3):249-56. PubMed ID: 22366078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fill of the nucleus cavity affects mechanical stability in compression, bending, and torsion of a spine segment, which has undergone nucleus replacement.
Arthur A; Cannella M; Keane M; Singhatat W; Vresilovic E; Marcolongo M
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 May; 35(11):1128-35. PubMed ID: 20473120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of orientation on measured failure strengths of thoracic and lumbar spine segments.
Campbell-Kyureghyan NH; Yalla SV; Voor M; Burnett D
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2011 May; 4(4):549-57. PubMed ID: 21396604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
